MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Comments
check out #Feb14Coup and the mostly earlier #WhathappeninginMyammar, they are both trending, there are obviously lots of activists tweeting, including accusations of things like arrests out of homes at midnight and shooting people with live bullets
by artappraiser on Sun, 02/14/2021 - 5:55am
by artappraiser on Sun, 02/14/2021 - 7:17am
Well that really sucks - 3 weeks into Biden's administration we see our feeble diminished capacity to affect events abroad (tho many on the left say this is a great thing). It's a shame we can't return to those glory days when we had lots of pull with Myanmar and we were able to shape their attitude towards human rights and free society. Guess we have to get used to settling for less.
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 02/14/2021 - 8:51am
I'm one of those who thinks a diminishment in U.S. power would be more good than bad.
by Aaron Carine on Sun, 02/14/2021 - 9:27am
Yeah, but a million+ Uyghurs for one disagree. Putin & Xi aren't gonna help them. But whatevs, we already had this discussion - leads nowhere.
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 02/14/2021 - 10:26am
We can't do much for the Uighurs.
by Aaron Carine on Sun, 02/14/2021 - 2:20pm
Really? $500bill/yr imports means no leverage, can't do nuttin'?
Or we shouldn't, for some reason?
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 02/14/2021 - 2:29pm
It gets complicated, doesn't it? You have defended shipping so many American jobs to China for the humanitarian reason that so many Chinese have been lifted from poverty. Now that so much of our manufacturing infrastructure is gone and we are financial codependents, how are we to use our *leverage* to change China's internal policy? Quit borrowing money from them and quit buying their products and quit selling them ours and sanction them until enough Chinese are forced back into poverty that they revolt and force their leaders to give the Uighurs a break? I don't see that working even if we actually had the power to do it. Again, what is our leverage and how should it be used? And, if you can describe a way that might work, do you think it has any chance of being implemented under either a Democratic or Republican administration if the 1% mostly responsible for offshoring those jobs could anticipate suffering even a 5% loss of profit from doing so? Or a 1%?
by A Guy Called LULU on Sun, 02/14/2021 - 4:13pm
So it's impossible to engage in win-win business and still stand up for basic human rights? Like we're all just so close to slavery work camps to make a buck? Quite the cynic. The US has done pretty well outsourcing certain manufacturing, while greatly increasing high-margin manufacturing. And yet Apple and WalMart make huge profits that go primarily to US investors. Yes, extreme poverty in the world has decreased from 30% to 8-9% since 1989 even as the global pooulation's increased by 50% - former Soviet satellites, Chinese, SE Asian countries entering the free market and doing quite well.
But yes, if we're paying for half a trillion dollars a year, we have some leverage. The TPP that Hillary was for was to diversify production around the Pacific, bolster Vietnam and Indonesia and Peru and others. But no, that was too evil, so Trump got in, and suddenly we don't pressure human rights violators anymore. China loves the shit outta that. (Of course Russia never got it's sanctions lifted, but Putin got a fair amount of love from Trump)
Cynical, Lulu. No, it's not an easy situation, but also not hopeless - with some effort. E.g. we had made some progress getting North Korea to back off its nuke development before Trump got his bromance. We got China to shiftt gears in pollution and greenhouse gases by stressing self-interest. Yes, there are things that can be done
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 02/14/2021 - 6:14pm
You stated that we could, but still do not give any indication how we could, leverage our economic influence on China to help the Uighurs. You still maintain that it is the case that we have the leverage but still do not say anything to indicate what the fulcrum point is. Come up with a workable answer to that and win the combined Nobel Prize in economics and peace. Good luck, I would be happy for both you and the Uighurs.
by A Guy Called LULU on Sun, 02/14/2021 - 6:45pm
Dude, this is a Wendy's.
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 02/14/2021 - 6:51pm
Don't have any idea what that is supposed to mean unless you are excusing nothing being on this menu of yours but big greasy nothing burgers.
by A Guy Called LULU on Sun, 02/14/2021 - 7:18pm
Wendy's (or Arby's)
https://youtu.be/t1TGFGnH95w?t=40
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 02/15/2021 - 6:29am
Soft power - we still do that
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/17/middleeast/saudi-biden-mbs-robertson-...
by PeraclesPlease on Wed, 02/17/2021 - 8:52pm
Maybe sanctions on China could change their behavior, maybe not. I doubt we can turn them into a free country. Anyway, we aren't going to slap an embargo on China, because it would hurt us too much.
by Aaron Carine on Sun, 02/14/2021 - 9:14pm