MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXqMzmFSX_4
Aaaaaaaaaah, the smell of coal dust in the morning. This chapter on public corruption was supposed to begin with a discussion of the Pennsylvania Juvenile Court scandal.
But I really cannot really begin the discussion unless I get into the issue concerning privatization of our penal institutions. Rummy and his neocon compadres call this new scheme ‘outsourcing’.
So I am stuck discussing the philosophy of outsourcing and why the concept SUCKS!!!
Capitalism is an economic system in which the means of production and distribution and industry are privately owned and operated for a private profit; decisions regarding supply, demand, price, distribution, and investments are made by private actors in the market rather than by central planning by the government; profit is distributed to owners who invest in businesses, and wages are paid to workers employed by businesses.
I do not have the space or the inclination to get into some long discussion of what capitalism is or is not. To me it is a concept that is easily condensed into this nice wiki paragraph.
Now Rummy, along with most of the other billionaires and their top employees, would tell you that ANYTHING state run sucks. Therefore the first rule he laid down as Secretary of Defense under George W. Bush was that outsourcing was the goal of the Administration. And since the DOD receives and pays out more money than any government in the world, Rummy’s philosophy became pretty important.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has enthusiastically embraced outsourcing. In a speech that drew little notice because it came on Sept. 10, he announced creation of a Senior Executive Council that "will scour the Department for functions that could be performed better and more cheaply through commercial outsourcing." (SAA, 9/14/01)
We outsourced all sorts of DOD programs INCLUDING THE GODDAMN ARMY. Half of the ‘troops’ in Iraq and Afghanistan were not MEMBERS OF OUR ARMED FORCES. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R40764.pdf
Just from a philosophical point of view, outsourcing does not make any sense or cents.
The magic of capitalism is that the means of production, demand, price, distribution and investments by private actors is that it MAKES MONEY. Government planning just interferes with the entire process. So say the fascist corporate oligarchs.
The problem with outsourcing is that ALL THE MONEY COMES FROM THE GOVERNMENT. So the object of any particular outsourcing is:
To make more money off of the government.
Some of these outsourcing programs are cost + so that when the company incurs more costs in fulfilling the government purpose, it gets more money from the government.
If you are manufacturing tires and your costs go up, you have to add those costs to the price of your tires. But when some other tire company figures out how to cut its costs in its manufacturing process, your tire company is going to lose customers.
But when you are the company doing business with the government, especially on a cost + basis, your one customer aint goin nowhere.
And when your company receives a no-bid contract through the DOD, you are competing with no one for the affections of your one customer.
This does not compute!!!
And yet it does. If there is nothing that the repubs hate more than communism, it is happy workers.
Outsourcing ensures basic tenets of the repub party:
Well, these are the types of values that I ascribe to the managerial class.
From each according to his abilities….
But that is my bias!!!!
Let us look at a few examples of how this ‘system’ works.
Once upon a time, in coal country, a guy by the name of Greg Zappala had a brilliant idea as to how to make some money from outsourcing.
He had what some people call ‘contacts’.
Zappala was the son of a Chief Justice of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. And Greg’s brother was the D.A. for Allegheny County Pennsylvania.
Well Greg got his buddy, Luzerne County Senior Judge Michael Conahan, to declare a certain Juvenile Detention Center unfit for habitation.
Then Greg Zappala, purchased the facility from the County.
Then Zappala, with low interest loans from the state, refurbished the center and sold it back to the county for fifty or sixty million dollars.
Then Zappala LEASED THE CENTER BACK FROM THE COUNTY.
And Zappala owns other Juvenile Centers.
Then he talked Conahan and Judge Mark A. Ciavarella to start sentencing juveniles to the center.
Records show that in 2004 -- Pennsylvania Child Care's first full year of operation -- Luzerne County spent $2.9 million to incarcerate juveniles at various detention centers and boot camps throughout the state, including Mr. Zappala's centers.
That's more than double the amount the county spent in 2002, the year before Pennsylvania Child Care opened. A breakdown of the amount spent by Luzerne County at each center where its juveniles were incarcerated was not immediately available.
Statewide, spending on juvenile detention increased 15 percent during the same time period, according to the state Department of Public Welfare, which reimburses counties for half of their costs for juvenile incarceration. http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09046/949273-85.stm#ixzz10qaxKfQK
So Zappala ended up with more than just one privately run juvie center and was ripping off the state as well as the county—and I can imagine that some federal funds came his way also.
As kind of a thank you to Conahan, Zappala basically ‘kicked back’ some 2.7 million bucks in just four years for the judge’s help.
There are a number of suits against the state and the county for the torts committed by the Judges as well as the centers.
I will get into the damage to the children in the next couple days.
Suffice it to say that government outsourcing does not always work.
Children, thousands of them, have been injured and will suffer from those injuries for decades to come.
The county and the state will lose millions upon millions of dollars in their own civil courts.
Do you know that the judges had entered into a plea agreement as early as March of last year? They were to be incarcerated for 8 years and pay a $250,000 fine.
But the judges’ judge was pissed and would not allow this agreement without full confessions from the felons as well as full apologies.
Both judges had been walking around on a $1,000,000.00 bond since the plea agreement fell through last year.
And why were not all the assets of both judges confiscated by the State of Pennsylvania immediately under RICO? And RICO applied because it was part and parcel of the 48 count indictment against these animals.
At any rate, in July of this year, the judges decided to enter into a new plea agreement BUT SENTENCING AS NOT YET OCCURRED. They are walking around free as unjailed birds.
Although, I am pleased to announce, a new indictment was handed down a few days ago calling for the confiscation of all Judge Ciavarella’s assets as well as Judge Conahan’s assets. Thank the lord for small favors. http://www.torttalk.com/2010/09/ciavarella-re-indicted-in-luzerne.html
I maintain that this example of corrupt judges is just a symptom of a systematic illness known as ‘outsourcing’.
And it is also symptomatic of a Republican view of the universe.
Outsourcing is not capitalism.
Outsourcing is just another means for corporations to feed at the public trough. Outsourcing allows corporations to provide lower wages and benefits for employees who would survive much better as government employees. Outsourcing is a great means of providing huge benefits for the few as opposed to the many.
Outsourcing is a misuse of public funds.
Comments
It's hard not to think that there are many other similar scams being run nation-wide, and corrupt judges getting similar kickbacks for juvenile sentencing.
Will the details of this case cause other districts to look more carefully at the sentencing and prisoner placements by judges? You know it has to fairly ubiquitous, yes? And not just in juvenile cases. The entire Prison-Industrial Complex is ripe for this same sort of ugliness.
Can we afford to read about the consequences to the children? That'll be hard, Dick.
by we are stardust on Fri, 10/01/2010 - 7:27am
First of all, unless you are some kind of science fiction nut, we cannot outsource our juvenile justice system. THIS IS NUTS.
So yes, we must look at all instances where the penal system for youth is privatised.
Second, our penal system should never be outsourced. The State is suppose to sentence you not GE. For Chrissakes (blesses himself)
Third, outsourcing means that people in the civil arena make money off of crime.
THIS MAKES NO SENSE.
Good points Stardust!!!
by Richard Day on Fri, 10/01/2010 - 7:50am
LOL! I believe they were your points, but I agree; they were good!
You may want to blog about prisoner-made products, too: a new (?) form of slavery.
http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=6706
http://urbanhabitat.org/node/856
by we are stardust on Fri, 10/01/2010 - 9:45am
I had thought about getting into the slavery aspect. Thank you for the links.
by Richard Day on Fri, 10/01/2010 - 4:39pm
Meh, maybe not if that would consist of going after F.P.I./Unicor, as one runs into the problem that it was created during the administration of the sainted FDR. Also too, twas the Bush administration who last tried to "mitigate this competitive advantage held by UNICOR over the private sector."
Tis socialism you see, to be "restricted to selling its products and services to Federal government agencies and has no access to the commercial market."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Prison_Industries
by artappraiser on Fri, 10/01/2010 - 4:55pm
That Wiki link...I just envision Wall Street salivating over the opportunity to pay workers a quarter a day. hahaahha
by Richard Day on Fri, 10/01/2010 - 5:15pm
well, in looking that up, I did run across that the American Apparel & Footwear Association sort of thinks of it as unfair "outsourcing":
http://www.apparelandfootwear.org/LegislativeTradeNews/FederalPrisonIndu...
they would like to get themselves some of those government contracts. It's a prickly subject, to be sure. I imagine the New Deal era idea was to have them paying for their vocational training rather than have the few taxpayers there were doing it, or just letting them sit in their cells and train each other in more crime.
Some thread some where brought it to my attention recently, I didn't know about it before. My first reaction was hey, that means that those who are sentenced for terrorism could end up making the desks at the State Department, some right winger could really do something with that.
by artappraiser on Fri, 10/01/2010 - 5:56pm
Drawer-pull bombs? LSD on the desk blotters? Bio-toxins in the ink-wells?
by we are stardust on Sat, 10/02/2010 - 10:40am