The Bishop and the Butterfly: Murder, Politics, and the End of the Jazz Age
    Wattree's picture

    A Message to the Black Community

    BENEATH THE SPIN • ERIC L. WATTREE

    A Message to the Black Community


    The hip hop community takes great pride in "keeping it real." But are they really keeping it real, or are they simply struttin' around saying, "look at me," while the corporate elite have them unknowingly doing an updated version of Steppin' Fechit - right down to the ape-like body language?

    Now, it's not my intention to broad-brush an entire community of artists, because old-schoolers make that mistake every generation. Their ears just aren't attune to a new and different approach to music - Swing musicians did it to Dizzy and Bird when they developed be bop, and many musicians and critics did it to Miles and Coltrane (especially Trane) when they began to push the boundaries. But in the case of hip hop, it's a little different.

    Dizzy, Bird, Miles, and Trane were all well schooled musicians with total control over content. These musicians were the best in the world. They knew more about music than a brain surgeon knew about medicine. In addition, they were totally focused on the art, not self-aggrandizement. But many young hip hoppers, on the other hand, are young, undereducated brothers off the street who are paid large sums of money to portray the Black community in their own image. So while Miles and Trane represented the genius within the Black community, many of these young brothers - certainly not all, but far too many - are rewarded by corporate manipulators to magnify Black dysfunction - and the more dysfunctional, the better.

    This is not just my opinion. My position can be substantiated by facts. The fact is, most of these young people don't even have the skill to create their own music - they have to "sample" the music of their predecessors who understood the importance of taking the time to learn music theory, or at the very least, learning to play scales and chord progressions on a musical instrument. And spoken word artists like Oscar Brown Jr. and Gil Scott-Heron were actually poets who took the time to learn the rules of English grammar so they could uplift and educate the community with their eloquence. So to listen to one of these brothers not only constituted a class in history, poetry and English grammar, but they also had the ability to inspire the next generation to educate themselves.

    But many of these young brothers who pass for stars today specialize in dumbing down the Black community. Their lyrics are amateurish, their rhymes are clumsy and predictable, their grammar is atrocious, and their message is dysfunctional - they denigrate black women, promote crime and drug abuse, and drag the Black community through the mud. In short, they promote the position that ignorance is bliss. As a direct result, instead of inspiring their fans to a higher level of intellectual achievement, it leaves them unable to speak simple business English, which is essential to getting through a job interview.

    And this is not happening by accident. Since the corporate elite in this country can no longer physically enslave the people, they've decided to enslave our minds. In the sixties and seventies the Black community began to move forward, then in the eighties Ronald Reagan flooded the inner cities with drugs in order to support his illegal war in Nicaragua. That effectively took out an entire generation of Black people. As a result, in the following generation we were left with young people who were raised by dysfunctional parents - which means that they were severed from everything in their heritage that took place prior to their parents. These young people are not even Black anymore, at least culturally speaking, they just have dark skin. Am I lying? Count the dark skinned sisters in their videos.

    The corporatists continued their assault on our identity by mounting a brutal attack on the nation's educational system and depriving young people to an exposure to history. They then took over all of our access to information by repealing the Fairness Doctrine and taking over the media, leaving our young people completely vulnerable to corporate programming. Consequently, the very same thing is happening to them - and to you - that FOX News is doing to the Teabaggers; it's just a little more subtle. So is there any wonder why young people are prone to promote a form of "music" that's anti-Black, and denigrates the very womb of their own culture? I think not.

    And this situation has not only impacted the hip hop community. We now find ourselves in a community where Black people in general are just as racist towards other Blacks as any racist Hillbilly. Think about how you're treated on your job by many of your Black managers and superiors. Many Black people who work for the U.S. postal service, for example, are treated so badly by they're Black superiors that they're literally praying that these Black overseers be replaced by White people.

    So if we want to save the Black community, we have a Herculean effort before us. The first thing we must do is stop allowing ourselves to be distracted by all the little goodies that appeal to our hedonism. We've also got to limit the time we spend partying and shakin' our booties and start paying more attention to our kids and what's going on around us. Excessive partying is for kids. When you're an adult it time to take care of business.

    Being a parent is about much more than just sitting our kids in a room in front of the television set and feeding and watering them like plants. One of the reasons that we often wonder why we don't understand our own kids is because they're being raised by BET, MTV, and ESPN. Even as I write this sentence they're probably somewhere being programed by a radio or television whispering in their ear, teaching them twisted corporate values instead of your own.

    And consider this. If they're being taught by the media that the only thing women are good for is sex, what kind of husbands are they going to become? If they never see the pimps on television riding around with kids in the backseat, what kind of fathers are they likely to become? And if they're being taught that drugs, big cars, and bling are the only things that make life worthwhile, yet, they're too illiterate to get a job, what do you think they're going to turn to? That's right - crime.

    Now that, my people, is keeping it real.

    Miles Davis and John Coltrane

    MILES

    We knew him as Miles,
    the Black Prince of style,
    his nature fit jazz to a tee.

    Laid back and cool,
    a low threshold for fools,
    he set the tone
    of what a jazzman
    should be.

    Short on words,
    and unperturbed, about
    what the people thought;
    frozen in time, drenched
    in the sublime,
    of the passion
    his sweet horn
    had wrought.

    Solemn to the bone,
    distant and torn,
    even Trane could
    scarcely get in;
    I can still hear the tone
    of this genius who mourned,
    that precious note
    that he couldn't
    quite bend.

    Wattree

    Eric L. Wattree
    wattree.blogspot.com
    [email protected]
    Religious bigotry: It's not that I hate everyone who doesn't look, think, and act like me - it's just that God does.

    Comments

    Good piece, Eric.  I don't know the music culture so well any more, but some of the videos I do see on Canadian teevee ballast your take on it all.  I watch the women, too, on the videos, and wonder if they feel how badly they're being used too often as sex objects.  Probably not.  Economic subvervience aiding negative stereotypes.  Yeah.  Sigh.


    Thank you, Stardust.

    You mentioned the way women are portrayed.  I think that's the key to reversing this trend in music. We've got to put a scarlett letter on the forehead of these guys by raising our daughters from birth that they are deadbeats, who worship the God of betrayal.  I've already spent a lot of time sending that message to my granddaughter, who's a gorgeous freshman in junior high school with a lot of clout among her friends - and I'm using their own hip hop videos to drive home my point.

    And with my own son and daughter, my wife and I used to drive them to the most deprived part of the ghetto - areas where they didn't even have sidewalks - to show them a first-hand look at the life that was being glamourized, then we'd jump on the freeway and take them to Beverly Hills, Malibu, and Pacific Palisades to see what life could be like.  Then, we simply said, "It's up to you." 

    It seemed to have worked, because they're both doing very well as adults.  My daughter is a human resources specialist at her alma mater, and  my son is a federal agent . . . who lives on the beach.  

    The key is, to make sure you're closer to your kids than the people on the street. In fact, my late wife and I brought the street into us.  Our house became the the spot where the kids hung out.  When I went to work on Saturdays I would have to step over teenagers asleep on the floor of my living room. The kids used to save us a spot at all of the games, we bought a van and hauled them all over town on the weekends, and we socialized with their teachers - dinners, card parties, etc. In addition, we'd throw parties in my backyard twice a year for the kids, their parents, teachers, and the local police, who would come by on the weekend to get their butts kicked in basketball.  So everyone knew everyone else on a social level.  As a result,  when my son was having problems in math, the school opened up a special class after school for all the kids who were having problems in that subject.

    Raising our kids is the most important thing we do in this life - it should be a parent's prime purpose in life.  We've got to get people to understand that.  And what people don't understand is, it's not a burden.  In fact, it's a blast.  It gives you a second chance to educate yourself and to relive your youth.  It was the happiest days of my life - so far.  I intend to write a book about it.


    Hard not to smile at the picture of your tours to the gated communities, as IMO we shouldn't aspire so much to those conspicuously-consuming liefstyles, but I take your point.  ;o)

    This thead has been bouncing around in my brain since I read it, both your original piece and the comments, Des's in particular about pushing alternatives.  Your comment above is on topic to one part of my musings: family structure.  You and your wife and kids were a cohesive unit, likely with aunties and uncles and others you and the kids could depend on.  And in so many ways it means that there was time and energy for school meetings, reading to the kids, outings for culture and learning and pleasure, or 'being closer to your kids than the people on the street'. 

    We've all read the statistics (though I can't quote the numbers) about how many young women are raising kids as single moms, and it's more common in black communities, though whites are heading toward parity there, I think. 

    But I imagine how hard it must be to have a job, maybe two, just to make ends meet, and how hard it must be to carve out the time and energy to be a good parent.  There are plenty of great stories of women who pulled it off, but they have to be the exceptions, or they wouldn't be seen as heroic stories.

    Welfare dependence sucked, welfare reform has sucked in terms of changing poverty.  Community cooperatives may be an answer, sort of creating families out of common needs in neighborhoods or something.  I always thought one of the best things in that regard might be an organization that offered respite help: Call us if you sincerely need a break, some short-term free daycare, time to get your shit together.  Or day-care cooperatives that promoted healthy eating, and reading and the nurtutring of young 'uns.  Some healthy alternatives to stable two-parent families, I guess.  anyway, sorry for rambling.  Nice blog, Eric.


    I guess whenever I considered what a proper, personal "aspiration" should be as I grew throughout my life, it always involved reaching real hard to become something bigger than myself, which is unattainable by definition but which is nonetheless enriching in its exercise.

    So much of what I see of aspirations in today's culture is an effort to celebrate your "self." Period.

    There's a big difference in it, and it seems so unfulfilling. 


    I agree, Sleepin Jeezus.

    God made birds to fly, fish to swim, and man to think.  So the most fulfilling thing in life is continuing to reach beyond our grasp - it keeps us invigorated, it helps us to maintain our self-esteem, and it keeps us young.

    One of the reasons that there is so much misery in this world is because people are under the misconception that the acquisition of external "things" will make them happy.  But the fact is, happiness, or contentment, is an internal quality, so external things can have very little impact on it.

    True happiness is contentment, and the only way that we can be content is through self-esteem.  But most of us make the mistake of thinking we can gain self-esteem by buying things that will impress others, and thereby, gaining self-esteem through the admiring or envious eyes of others.  But it doesn't work that way. It doesn't matter how much you impress others, you can't fool yourself.  So even if you're a billionaire, if you are of poor character, your inner self will know that, and deny you the self-esteem that you seek. That's why most of us live our lives like a dog chasing his tail - the faster we run, the more elusive our goal becomes. 


    Well really it's just about pushing the alternatives.

    Blacks like whites can go in for more reading, more writing, more social involvement, more scientific & medical exploration, more computers & engineering, business - less on arts, sports, religion, politics.

    And then there are other ways of toughening up - in the arts where real achievements are demanded, where the accolades are withheld until you actually do something really tough, and then you do something tougher. Once upon a time, it was super-trained, super-talented musicians like Prince, Hendrix, Coltrane & Miles, Marley, Aretha, even Public Enemy and Tracy Chapman, that were the epitome of cool, people who for the most part mastered their instruments and struck out in new styles. Now it's the easy way out - just open your mouth, and let the rap fall out.

    But really, I think it all comes back to reading good stuff, as early as possible, as varied and as interesting as possible, having someone help with all the tough words to work your way up.

    I'm reading "Resurrection of Alice" right now, written in a wonderful approximation of black/southern dialect. It's like math, a wonderful backdrop to what might be a fairly standard tale. Just as one way of doing things.

    Multiply this by 100, whether Harry Potter, Color Purple, Hitchiker, Cuckoo's Nest - and more exotic, all the stuff to keep kids out of trouble and brains growing. (Okay, you can get in more trouble from reading say Clockwork Orange, but then you're learning a bit of Russian at the same time....)

    And I think it's affecting all races, but blacks have always had a more limited option on the American scene.


    Good thinking; guess that's why they pay you the big bucks.  I was thinking about quick rewards in general, but more for black kids and teens, maybe young adults, without families to back them up during the slow process of learning and succeeding a bit at at a time, and taking pleasure in the learning, it's harder.

    I keep thinking of how many kids of all colors are spending most of their time on their own  little tech devices, not even communicating with each other, much less the world.  Language is such a smaller part of their worlds, both written and spoken.

    And there's an increasing move for K-12 kids to learn at computer consoles; same thing, really.  I feel old.  ;o)


    Desideroo,

    Bingo! You just said what I tried to express in my response above.  In short, happiness is inner growth and self-esteem.


    Nice piece Eric.

    just beginning to listen to a little Miles. Kind of a 60's rock fellow actually.

    But Miles would take a popular tune and play with it--much to the chagrin of some Jazz

    Aficionados, from what I read. He makes it easier for me to appreciate the art.

     

     


    Did Miles or Coltrane get regular radio play, however? Standard corporate radio has been dedicating to pushing terrible music for a while now.


    Orion I could get into the pay-off censured radio of my youth for hours. The Jazz stations were there, you just had to find them; that was when FM came to the fore, up in these parts anyway.

     


    I'm sure. It's probably made worse by radio being a vanguard for television commercials, ringtones, etc. Aside from bohemian record stores and blogs, where is good music to go?


    OrionXP,

    Most urban cities had at least one 24 hr. jazz station where Miles, trane, Monk, etc. were played around the clock.


    Thanks Richard,

    Miles went through many phases in his career. First, as a young student of Dizzy and Bird he proved himself a more than capable musician with a unique and very personal brooding style. Then he founded the cool jazz era where he proved himself to be uniquely innovative, not only on his instrument, but he matached Dizzy and Bird's achievement of fathering an entire school of jazz. Then he moved on again, refining cool jazz to establish the school of modern and then  progressive jazz along John Coltrane.  Then when his lip started to fail and he could no longer negotiate some of the intricate musical changes that he once could, he picked up Wayne Shorter and the young Herbie Hancock and became more cerebral, and at the same time planting the seed of fusion.  Thereafter he retired, only to come back later as a full fledged leader of the fusion movement.

    So when we speak of Miles, we must asked, "which Miles?"  


    I'm only going to weigh in to a few elements of this because it's not really in my realm of jurisdiction.

    When Stepin Fetchit and Amos Andy was around, they were also coupled with white comedians like Abbot and Costello or Life of Riley who behaved silly, dumb and ridiculous. The racism was subtle and there though - in that the guys who played Amos and Andy dressed in black face, were white and actively mocked a style of speech that wasn't their own. 

    I thought about this while watching this clip from Russia Today's Aloyna Show:

    Below, in the YouTube netherworld, was a comment that said "It's nice of Russia Today to have given this homeless man a job."


    Overt rascism doesn't bother me as much as subtle rascism.  With overt rascism you see it for what it is so it does more to denigrate the rascist than it does the victim.  It's that subtle, implied superiority, that gets next to me, because it has a subliminal message that seeps in under the radar. That's the most damaging kind of rascism. I see a lot of that in many of the movies from the 30's and 40's, when a Clark Gable would say something nice to a Black man and he would go into spasms of delight.  You got the feeling that the Black man went home and bragged about it to his family and friends for months.  It made Black people look like pets.