Genghis on Debt Ceiling II: Return of the Boehner
Gallup: Obama 45, Romney 45
Fact That Things Suck Cited As Impediment To Re-Election
|
Genghis on Debt Ceiling II: Return of the Boehner Gallup: Obama 45, Romney 45 Fact That Things Suck Cited As Impediment To Re-Election |
Read |
One of the recent propaganda tactics of the right wing has been to appropriate the leftist language of discrimination and civil rights to argue that liberal elites are persecuting white Christian conservatives. The most extreme form of this tactic is the Nazi attack, according to which liberals are portrayed as Nazis or fascists in order to represent them as brutal oppressors of helpless conservative victims. Commentators on the right have revised history to represent fascism as a leftist movement. They have invented or exaggerated associations between Democrats and Nazis. They have belabored the slightest similarities between Nazi doctrine and liberalism. And they have darkly hinted at the possibility of a fascist revolution in America.
But perhaps I should just let them speak for themselves...
Discover everything that you never wanted to know about conservative paranoia at my Persecution Politics series at dagblog.com.
By Nancy Benac, Associated Press, May 16, 2012
After the nastiness of the Republican primary race, former candidates have collective amnesia about Romney disses
Note to self: you think you're so smart about this kinda stuff, but you yourself fell for it once again.....so much for all the prognostication about one of our political parties disintegrating from all the primary campaign animosity.
Pew Resarch Center for the People and the Press, May 15, 2012
For decades survey research has provided trusted data about political attitudes and voting behavior, the economy, health, education, demography and many other topics. But political and media surveys are facing significant challenges as a consequence of societal and technological changes.
It has become increasingly difficult to contact potential respondents and to persuade them to participate. The percentage of households in a sample that are successfully interviewed – the response rate – has fallen dramatically. At Pew Research, the response rate of a typical telephone survey was 36% in 1997 and is just 9% today. The general decline in response rates is evident across nearly all types of surveys, in the United States and abroad. At the same time, greater effort and expense are required to achieve even the diminished response rates of today. These challenges have led many to question whether surveys are still providing accurate and unbiased information [....]
On May 16, 2012 at 7:00 PM, the Ride of Silence will begin in North America and roll across the globe. Cyclists will take to the roads in a silent procession to honor cyclists who have been killed or injured while cycling on public roadways. Although cyclists have a legal right to share the road with motorists, the motoring public often isn't aware of these rights, and sometimes not aware of the cyclists themselves.
...
The Ride of Silence is a free ride that asks its cyclists to ride no faster than 12 mph, wear helmets, follow the rules of the road and remain silent during the ride. There are no sponsors and no registration fees. The ride, which is held during National Bike Month, aims to raise the awareness of motorists, police and city officials that cyclists have a legal right to the public roadways. The ride is also a chance to show respect for and honor the lives of those who have been killed or injured.
A new UCLA rat study is the first to show how a diet steadily high in fructose slows the brain, hampering memory and learning — and how omega-3 fatty acids can counteract the disruption. The peer-reviewed Journal of Physiology publishes the findings in its May 15 edition.
"Our findings illustrate that what you eat affects how you think," said Fernando Gomez-Pinilla, a professor of neurosurgery at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and a professor of integrative biology and physiology in the UCLA College of Letters and Science. "Eating a high-fructose diet over the long term alters your brain's ability to learn and remember information. But adding omega-3 fatty acids to your meals can help minimize the damage."
While earlier research has revealed how fructose harms the body through its role in diabetes, obesity and fatty liver, this study is the first to uncover how the sweetener influences the brain.
The UCLA team zeroed in on high-fructose corn syrup, an inexpensive liquid six times sweeter than cane sugar, that is commonly added to processed foods, including soft drinks, condiments, applesauce and baby food. The average American consumes more than 40 pounds of high-fructose corn syrup per year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
"We're not talking about naturally occurring fructose in fruits, which also contain important antioxidants," explained Gomez-Pinilla, who is also a member of UCLA's Brain Research Institute and Brain Injury Research Center. "We're concerned about high-fructose corn syrup that is added to manufactured food products as a sweetener and preservative."
[Better write this down]
Christopher Doyon, a.k.a. Commander X, sits atop a hillside in an undisclosed location in Canada, watching a reporter and photographer make their way along a narrow path to join him, away from the prying eyes of law enforcement.
It’s been a few weeks of encrypted emails back and forth, working out the security protocol to follow for interviewing Doyon, one of the brains behind Anonymous, now a fugitive from the FBI.
Doyon, who readily admits taking part in some of the highest-profile hacktivist attacks on websites last year — from Tunisia to Orlando, Sony to PayPal — was arrested in September for a comparatively minor assault on the county website of Santa Cruz, Calif., where he was living, in retaliation for the town forcibly removing a homeless encampment on the courthouse steps.
The “virtual sit-in” lasted half an hour. For that, Doyon is facing 15 years in jail.
Look, it's well known that Hitler was in cahoots with the Commies. That whole slaughtering thing was just a cover. That you can't see the obviousness of it all just shows you've drunken the kool-aid.
I had to stop the video half way, because I couldn't take anymore. But I did make it to the point where Michael Savage says that Media Matters are the Nazis of our day (or something like that) because they're tracking conservative media commentators, "trying to trip them up."
I'm sorry, but that is freaking hilarious. He's calling Media Matters fascist for holding media figures accountable for what they say in public. Seriously. Is he listening to himself. He's whining about his own words being used against him to prove that he's inconsistent or a hypocrite or a bigot or whatever? Here's a little tip for Michael Savage: If you STFU, nobody will be able to use your words against you.
It's worth watching to the end. The Beck clip DF mentioned is priceless.
As for wingnut hatred of Media Matters, it is indeed freaking hilarious, since 99% of MM content consists of unedited clips of right-wing commentators. They should pay MM for the PR. You should see O'Reilly go bonkers about it. He's called MM "vile," "anti-American," and "the most vicious element in our society today." He also has his own complex conspiracy theory about a plot between Soros and MM.
The thing is, Savage, O'Reilly, and friends don't really want help with MM. They need MM, Crooks & Liars, etc. to be the bogeyman in their paranoid conspiracy theories. It's like when Obama ditched Van Jones. Sure, the firing boosted Beck's wingnut cred, but it also deprived him of his favorite conspirator.
I don't get the right-wing fascination with Soros. Maybe it's just that he's the exception to the rule, being a lefty billionaire. They sure don't complain about the Koch family, etc.
A great question and worthy of its own blog post. It is weird and a bit creepy, and I'd like to delve further into it, but here's my first blush answer...
Modern conservative paranoia is rooted in Illuminati conspiracy theories. For instance, Pat Robertson's influential book, The New World Order, is basically a repackaging of classic Illuminati paranoia shorn of the overt anti-semitism. As a rich, international Jew, Soros is the model of an Illuminati conspirator. Google soros illuminati, and you'll see what I mean.
Does that mean that the right-wing Soros haters are anti-semitic? Not necessarily. People like O'Reilly and Beck have simply promulgated the watered down conspiracy theories that the real anti-semites invented. In a sense, O'Reilly and company inherited the Soros-hatred from the anti-semitic Illuminati folks.
Of course, it helps that Soros is very rich and very ambitious. I don't think that his vision is nearly as progressive or sweeping as the right wing imagine, but I understand why his ambitions would attract their attention.
I think you're giving O'Reilly and Beck too much credit. It's possible their hatred of Soros isn't at all rooted in anti-Semitism, but I think it's more likely that it is rooted in anti-Semitism..
Perhaps, but I won't make that accusation without better evidence. Hating Soros doesn't entail anti-Semitism, and I'm sure that there are conspiracy-minded Jews who hate him as well.
No, I wouldn't support leveling the accusation against them, either. I just don't want to come close to clearing them of that accusation.
It's simple:
1. He's a Democrat; and,
2. He's high-profile visible.
(Psssstttt!!!! Pass the word: he's also an immigrant and a fer'ner and a Jew.)
Wow, I've heard numerous theories about how the rise of the Nazi party could have been prevented, but never "read the Constitution - act Constitutionally." I guess those silly Germans should have just read it. Duh!
I love Beck's response. So Palinesque.
PS I haven't had a chance to read the Kansas critique. I'll respond on the other thread when I get to it.
Ah, cool. If you find it compelling, Frank did write a lengthy response to Bartels (and then Bartels wrote an op-ed responding to that), but I think Bartels makes a pretty damning case that Frank isn't as right as many seem to think.
Couldn't get the video to work. Lucky me.
Must be blocked by the vast right-wing conspiracy.
It's on youtube. Try the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3ogZiSN9iI
"One of the recent propaganda tactics of the right wing has been to appropriate the leftist language of discrimination and civil rights to argue that liberal elites are persecuting white Christian conservatives."
That began with Reagan, when he set the tone that unleashed this minority hoard of racists by saying "You have a RIGHT to be racist."
Thanks for stopping by JNagarya. It goes back even before Reagan to complaints of "reverse discrimination" in response to desegregation policies. Reagan certainly contributed as well. But it really took off in the 90's with the whole "thought police" backlash to so-called "political correctness," and the idea of Christian persecution has now been fully incorporated into right-wing fundamentalist ideology.