MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
During the video and reporting from Cairo last night, I heard automatic gunfire. MSNBC said it was just the army keeping order because neither protesters nor thugs were likely to have firearms. It occurred to me that it could have been very different if they had our gun culture. Not surprisingly, numerous bloggers had the same idea, and they show the usual divide:
Anti-gun bloggers expressed relief that few Egyptians, only 3% or 4%, are allowed to carry handguns, else there would have been far more bloodshed.
Pro-gun bloggers suggested that if more Egyptians were allowed to carry guns, their government would have been afraid to oppress them. They claim that anti-regime protestors are seizing guns from police stations, so there will be bloodshed.
We're so damn smart.
Back in America, firearms have become part of our daily lives. When I was a kid, half the fictional characters in films and television carried guns, but no one I knew in real life did - except police. Being shot at was the fate of those fictional characters, and a few desperate criminals and then, in a sudden shock, President Kennedy.
Not too much later was the tower shooting - ordinary students shot at by a stranger. Then Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy. Then students shot for demonstrating. Then a blur of restaurant shootings, workplace shootings, fast food shootings, school shootings, even police shootings. Mass shootings are still unsettling and tragic - but not really surprising. And although the numbers of actual victims are small, the idea that you and your spouse and kids may get caught unarmed and shot to death resonates far more with Americans than the idea that they may roll their SUV while speeding.
While I walk to and from work, I occasionally wonder, "What if this guy has a pistol, or that guy, or someone behind me?" Some guy just surprised and killed four armed police officers. Another one wounded four - in a police station! Even if I was armed, what could I do about a gun already pointed at me? Besides getting shot. Gun enthusiasts claim that situational awareness will help you prevail if a threat develops, but I'm doubtful.
I'm usually carrying something or on my bike or thinking about something I just read or want to write. To be situationally aware, I would have to give up my inner life, and focus on everything around me. I do that to a certain extent to be safe from vehicles and road hazards, but I suspect carrying a firearm would be a lot more demanding. Either it would be all I thought about, or I'd forget and accidentally shoot someone with it - probably myself.
Do I wish any of that on the Egyptians?
Comments
"Gun enthusiasts claim that situational awareness will help you prevail if a threat develops, but I'm doubtful."
I really hate when people say stuff like this. Even highly trained police officers and members of the military can fall prey to indiscriminate and some would argue almost involuntary shooting just because other people around them open fire. Most untrained civilians in America live their days almost entirely devoid of physical threat from their fellow humans.
I'm not criticizing anyone by bringing this up but the, I would say very situationally aware armed citizen who tried to stop the gunman during the Gifford shooting almost shot another well-meaning armed citizen. The first man's awareness manifested itself as the ability to stop himself from doing what his instincts wanted to do and he needed help (people telling him he had the wrong guy) to do that.
I know we all think we're ninjas but honestly, I think the worst part about me in a physical altercation is that I'd probably do nothing because unless things were made extremely obvious, I wouldn't know I was in one until it was too late.
by Michael Maiello on Thu, 02/03/2011 - 4:43pm
For one thing I do not feel that the current government in Egypt is the least bit in control of the situation and has not been for the past few days. What you get for trying to micro manage a country.
And they really do not know what to do or how to hand over control..even temporarily..to anyone who was not hand picked way before hand. The succession of power has been from the VP to President since the initiation of the government in the late 40s. All under essentially the same political party. They may have change the names over the years but that is all that has changed.
by cmaukonen on Thu, 02/03/2011 - 10:36pm