Ramona's picture

    Get out there and BUY your job. What is WRONG with you people?

    Yes, the mid-term elections are over and the crying jags have pretty much stopped, so, while I'm  shocked at the damage comfort chocolate has done to some people's butts. . .

    . . . I have just one thing to say about the overall impact of the glorious orgy of wastage known as the 21st Century American Campaign for Public Office So's I can Live off the Public Dole Whilst Killing it for Everyone Else:   Humph!!! (and also "We'll just see about that, lads and lassies!")

    In a country where the U.S. total debt is nearing 55 gazillion dollars, where the interest alone is over 3 bajillion, where the official number of unemployed citizens is almost 15 million but the actual number is 26 million, where we owe so much money to China they could conquer us simply by calling in their debt. . .in that country, our country ('tis of thee), the politicians--those bloody buggering bastards--spent 4.2 billion dollars on campaign advertising in order to secure for themselves not just any jobs but--get this--government jobs.

    So when we kept calling for jobs, jobs, jobs we apparently didn't make it clear that we were talking about ours, not theirs.  For months now, we've been concentrating on getting the votes out for people who needed a job so badly they spent more than most of us will earn in five lifetimes in order to get it.

    Is it asking too much, then, to expect that they'll come up with some meaningful ways of building a job market in the Greatest Country in the World so that the people who voted for them can get in on the American Dream?

    Money doesn't buy votes, it provides a glittery gift box for perceptions.  Real people still have to get out there and cast their ballots and it's those same real people who suffer and bleed when their own government turns against them at a time when they need them most.  What those 30 megakillion pieces of silver bought this time is the perception that real people aren't suffering and bleeding.  Not worthy people, anyway.

    This election was baffling in that one faction, the anti-government Republican Tea Party, ran on a platform of aggressively disinterested blind-eye and won.  They convinced millions of the most vulnerable among us that even though they'll be taking paychecks from the government and accepting all the perks that government will allow, and sitting in the halls of government deciding and voting on how best to stop the government from doing anything--it's what the American people want, by God, because they said so.  (And how did they say so?  By voting the anti-governments in, of course.)

    So it's all about the job but not all about the jobs and once again we're on our own, getting ready to shout from a mountaintop into the wind, hoping a few tiny word-wisps will escape the updrafts and waft down to earth, finding purchase on a mighty magic rock capable of transforming those syllables into actions that might actually mean something.



    But in case that doesn't happen, there's always this: 


    (I was hoping you weren't going to read this far.  I got nothing.)

     

    Cross-posted at Ramona's Voices here. (Nothing there, either)

    Topics: 

    Comments

    In a country where the U.S. total debt is nearing 55 gazillion dollars, where the interest alone is over 3 bajillion, where the official number of unemployed citizens is almost 15 million but the actual number is 26 million, where we owe so much money to China they could conquer us simply by calling in their debt. . .in that country, our country ('tis of thee), the politicians--those bloody buggering bastards--spent 4.2 billion dollars on campaign advertising in order to secure for themselves not just any jobs but--get this--government jobs.

    Oh ya...I remember seeing an infomercial about that on a local FOX affiliate. You send them some money and then attend a seminar and they give all the information you need to secure a government job. Sweat.


    Jobs, jobs, jobs....at least I don't have to hear Rick Michigan's whiney voice say that anymore because he done bought his for $6 million according to this.

    Spending personal fortunes on buying a government job has truly gotten out of hand.


    It's just crazy. Sure, some won and some lost, no matter what they spent, but in Bernero's case he didn't stand a chance. That article says Snyder spent 6 million dollars in the primary.  What did he spend overall?

    Something has to be done about campaign finance reform.  There will never be such a thing as a level playing field if money is the answer to everything.  Not fair.


    I thought the $6 mill was a little light myself, but didn't bother to reread the article before posting.  I'd read the figure was around $14 mill for Snyder while Bernero was under the $2 mill mark.  It was lopsided at whatever the final tally was.  Still, it was no where near DeVos's self-funded war chest.  Over $40 mill for the governorship which he lost to Granholm.  Ha. 


    Ran across this the other day.

    Published Oct. 11, 2007 (that is, before "the crash."):

    Global Migration Patterns and Job Creation

    Gallup’s World Poll reveals new findings on the “great global dream” and how it will affect the rise of the next economic empire

    Gallup is committed to conducting the World Poll for 100 years, but we may have already found the single most searing, clarifying, helpful, world-altering fact. If used appropriately, it may change how every leader runs his or her country. But at the very least, it needs to be considered in every policy, every law, and every social initiative. All leaders -- policy and law makers, presidents and prime ministers, parents, judges, priests, pastors, imams, teachers, managers, and CEOs -- need to consider it every day in everything they do.

    What the whole world wants is a good job.

    That is one of the single biggest discoveries Gallup has ever made. It is as simple and as straightforward an explanation of the data as we can give. If you and I were walking down the street in Khartoum, Tehran, Berlin, Lima, Los Angeles, Baghdad, Kolkata, or Istanbul, we would discover that on most days, the single most dominant thought carried around in the heads of most people you and I see is "I want a good job." It is the new current state of mind, and it establishes our relationship with our city, our country, and the whole world around us.

    Humans used to desire love, money, food, shelter, safety, and/or peace more than anything else. The last 25 years have changed us. Now we want to have a good job. This changes everything for world leaders.....

     

     

     


    Wow, that's a bombshell. Not the news--it doesn't come as a shock to most of us--but the fact that Gallup was so emphatic about their findings, even to the point of offering solutions.

    Who was listening?  Was it used during the campaigns?  If it wasn't, it should have been.  It should have changed everything.

    Just a mailing of the following would have done it (This came right after your quotes above. Notice the emphasis on "good" jobs):

    How does this change everything?

    * The leaders of countries and cities must make creating good jobs their No. 1 mission and primary purpose because securing good jobs is becoming the new currency for leadership. Everything leaders do must consider this new global state of mind, lest they put their cities and countries at risk.

    * Leaders in education will be forced to think beyond core curricula and graduation rates. If you are a school superintendent or a university president, you'll need to recognize that students don't want to merely graduate -- their education will need to result in a "good job."

    * Lawmakers need to contemplate whether and how new laws attract or repel a wide range of individual value systems. If enough people are sufficiently repelled, then the new laws will effectively strangle job creation.

    * Military leaders must consider it when waging war and planning for peace. They must ask themselves whether military strikes, occupations, or community policing will effectively build a growing economy with good jobs. The opportunity to have a good job is essential to changing a population's desperate, and violent, state of mind.

    * The mayors and city fathers of every city, town, and village on Earth must realize that every decision they make should consider the impact, first and foremost, on good jobs.


    A distinction worth making: the $3-4.3 billion was the amount spent for political advertising NOT the amount spent BY the political candidates. 

    http://adage.com/article?article_id=146818

    If a candidate spends $14 million, but outside groups spend $57 million because they wish to further their own interests, then don't blame the candidate for the combined total! 


    Technically, you're right, but don't the candidates end each ad with "I'm so-and-so and I approve this message"? So whether or not they've paid for them out of their own pockets they're their ads. Someone in their campaign has to approve an ad the candidate puts his or her name to. They know what's out there and who is behind it. To my mind that means they own it.

    Only the ads from the candidate's campaign have to have an "I approve this message".  Outside groups are legally prohibited from coordinating with the campaign, so that while they do support a candidate, the candidate doesn't 'own' it.  (This doesn't count ads sponsored by the candidate's party.)  Outside ads usually end with someone talking really fast saying, "This ad was paid for by Citizens for a Prosperous America"- or something similarly anodyne.


    You got me, Dave.  Still having a hard time with billions of dollars being spent on election campaigning (the point, actually), but you got me.


    If you listen to the 'Political Gabfest' (a podcast from Slate), David Plotz has been arguing that what this shows is that the U.S. elections have previously been "under capitalized".  It's a somewhat distasteful notion that there could be a dollar value assigned to elections, but distasteful or not I think he's right.  


    "Somewhat distasteful" is more than a bit of an understatement.  "Outrageously obscene" is my take on it.  We're in an economic crisis the likes of which most of us haven't seen in our lifetimes, and we're talking about billions with a B going toward political campaigns.

    We love to be stingy when it comes to actual needs, pretending that real people aren't being hurt, but this seems to be outside of any kind of moral distinction.  I'm sickened by it, and intellectual analyzing is not the antidote.  I still feel like vomiting.


    Latest Comments