Genghis on Debt Ceiling II: Return of the Boehner
Gallup: Obama 45, Romney 45
Fact That Things Suck Cited As Impediment To Re-Election
|
Genghis on Debt Ceiling II: Return of the Boehner Gallup: Obama 45, Romney 45 Fact That Things Suck Cited As Impediment To Re-Election |
Read |
Ok. So suffrage isn’t really under attack. But twice this year I’ve read accounts of writers who think it wouldn’t be such a bad idea to deny women the right to vote. It makes me wonder if the Republican party, having just this year burned major bridges with minorities and gays, is going for the trifecta.
The first account was by some blogger in
http://dagblog.com/politics/blame-game-its-your-fault-america-road-ruin-580
Now, we have another account:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_09/020196.php
British-American conservative thinker extraordinare John Derbyshire suggests that we would be a better country if women didn’t vote. Apparently, he’s devoted a whole chapter to the topic in his new book. But from an interview he gave on Alan Colmes’ radio show, it seems to boil down to his idea that women “lean hard to the left”.
So, Derbyshire thinks women shouldn’t be granted the vote because they don’t vote the way he wants them to. What a shining beacon of democracy this guy is. I wonder what he thinks of women in office. More importantly, I wonder if Michelle Malkin and Laura Ingram both voted for hard-left candidate Ralph Nader in 2000. Maybe it’s their fault we got President Bush.
By Nancy Benac, Associated Press, May 16, 2012
After the nastiness of the Republican primary race, former candidates have collective amnesia about Romney disses
Note to self: you think you're so smart about this kinda stuff, but you yourself fell for it once again.....so much for all the prognostication about one of our political parties disintegrating from all the primary campaign animosity.
Pew Resarch Center for the People and the Press, May 15, 2012
For decades survey research has provided trusted data about political attitudes and voting behavior, the economy, health, education, demography and many other topics. But political and media surveys are facing significant challenges as a consequence of societal and technological changes.
It has become increasingly difficult to contact potential respondents and to persuade them to participate. The percentage of households in a sample that are successfully interviewed – the response rate – has fallen dramatically. At Pew Research, the response rate of a typical telephone survey was 36% in 1997 and is just 9% today. The general decline in response rates is evident across nearly all types of surveys, in the United States and abroad. At the same time, greater effort and expense are required to achieve even the diminished response rates of today. These challenges have led many to question whether surveys are still providing accurate and unbiased information [....]
On May 16, 2012 at 7:00 PM, the Ride of Silence will begin in North America and roll across the globe. Cyclists will take to the roads in a silent procession to honor cyclists who have been killed or injured while cycling on public roadways. Although cyclists have a legal right to share the road with motorists, the motoring public often isn't aware of these rights, and sometimes not aware of the cyclists themselves.
...
The Ride of Silence is a free ride that asks its cyclists to ride no faster than 12 mph, wear helmets, follow the rules of the road and remain silent during the ride. There are no sponsors and no registration fees. The ride, which is held during National Bike Month, aims to raise the awareness of motorists, police and city officials that cyclists have a legal right to the public roadways. The ride is also a chance to show respect for and honor the lives of those who have been killed or injured.
A new UCLA rat study is the first to show how a diet steadily high in fructose slows the brain, hampering memory and learning — and how omega-3 fatty acids can counteract the disruption. The peer-reviewed Journal of Physiology publishes the findings in its May 15 edition.
"Our findings illustrate that what you eat affects how you think," said Fernando Gomez-Pinilla, a professor of neurosurgery at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and a professor of integrative biology and physiology in the UCLA College of Letters and Science. "Eating a high-fructose diet over the long term alters your brain's ability to learn and remember information. But adding omega-3 fatty acids to your meals can help minimize the damage."
While earlier research has revealed how fructose harms the body through its role in diabetes, obesity and fatty liver, this study is the first to uncover how the sweetener influences the brain.
The UCLA team zeroed in on high-fructose corn syrup, an inexpensive liquid six times sweeter than cane sugar, that is commonly added to processed foods, including soft drinks, condiments, applesauce and baby food. The average American consumes more than 40 pounds of high-fructose corn syrup per year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
"We're not talking about naturally occurring fructose in fruits, which also contain important antioxidants," explained Gomez-Pinilla, who is also a member of UCLA's Brain Research Institute and Brain Injury Research Center. "We're concerned about high-fructose corn syrup that is added to manufactured food products as a sweetener and preservative."
[Better write this down]
Christopher Doyon, a.k.a. Commander X, sits atop a hillside in an undisclosed location in Canada, watching a reporter and photographer make their way along a narrow path to join him, away from the prying eyes of law enforcement.
It’s been a few weeks of encrypted emails back and forth, working out the security protocol to follow for interviewing Doyon, one of the brains behind Anonymous, now a fugitive from the FBI.
Doyon, who readily admits taking part in some of the highest-profile hacktivist attacks on websites last year — from Tunisia to Orlando, Sony to PayPal — was arrested in September for a comparatively minor assault on the county website of Santa Cruz, Calif., where he was living, in retaliation for the town forcibly removing a homeless encampment on the courthouse steps.
The “virtual sit-in” lasted half an hour. For that, Doyon is facing 15 years in jail.
Wow.
That's flabbergasting.
It is and it isn't. For example, I know that secretly all the Dagboyz wish I didn't have a vote.
That depends. Are you for Mega-Shark or Giant Octopus?
Not at all. We just wish that you didn't have a voice.
If you didn't catch it, Colbert hosted guest Sheryl WuDunn, co-author of Half the Sky. I highly recommend it, but I can't get the embed code to copy so I've linked it here.
I've become increasingly angry about the condition of women in the developing world. One of the things that pisses me off to no end about the disingenuous frame of the "war on terror" is that we've continued to support regimes that are highly oppressive to women, such as those in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, because it is congruent with our "national interests".
As an atheist and a humanist, I regard the systematic destruction of the lives of women by oppressive, theocratic regimes is one of the greatest evils in the world today. As a pragmatist, we're shooting ourselves in the foot by not taking a moral stand on these issues.
Population is the driving factor in the problems of the 21st century. Consider global warming. Consider energy resources. Consider food and water. The rate of expulsion of greenhouse gases and the rate of consumption of resources are directly correlated and are functions of population.
As it happens, the best way to control the population is to educate women. Educated women tend to have fewer children later in life. They also tend to invest massively in their own families and communities.
I also maintain that the best way to reduce the incidence of terrorism is to increase economic opportunity. Terrorism, like other criminal activity, is directly correlated to the lack of economic opportunity that comes with failed states. Democracy, the rule of law and economic opportunity all go hand-in-hand and all serve to mitigate crimes both petty and egregious.
What if it turned out that one of the ways to mitigate terrorism and climate change and resource conflicts was to stop treating women as sub-human? What if it turned out that it was not only a moral imperative, but also pragmatic in terms of actually being able to solve these problems?
Meanwhile, we have people trying to turn back the clock here in the U.S. Colbert famously quipped that reality has a liberal bias. Maybe women also have a liberal bias. Maybe they're right.
We're definitely right. But so are you. Education and economic freedom for women are key.
As an aside, since you mention Saudi Arabia, I've been job searching outside the country--which is one of the reasons I haven't been writing much lately. There's definitely more on that to come. As of now, I'll be heading out sometime after Christmas.
I got a job offer in Saudi Arabia and I gave it a lot of thought. I could handle the hijab. I could handle covering my hair. I could handle (for a year) being treated by men like I wasn't as smart as them (hell, that happens in the states sometimes). What finally helped me decide that it wasn't a good idea to accept the offer was the total restriction of movement. I would have a nice apartment and a nice job, with other women of course, I would have a lot of money and a lot of vacation. But what I wouldn't have is the freedom to decide I'd like to go for a walk and then to put on my shoes and go. Because women can't go outside in SA without a male chaperone. So, I would have to be driven to my school and to the mall and to the grocery store and to anywhere. The driver, paid for by my employer, would also be my chaperone. Having a babysitter for a year I could not handle. So I said no.