oleeb's picture

    The Inevitable Result of Police State Powers? ABUSE!

    As today's front page at TPM makes clear, the executive branch of government cannot wield the sort of police state powers it has unlawfully and unconstitutionally claimed for itself without abusing those powers over and over again.  You can find the story of NSA wanting to bug a member of Congress without a warrant here: http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/04/report_nsa_tried_to_wiretap_member_of_congress.php?ref=fp1

    This is why the Constitution puts unbounded power out of reach of the government unless it is at least checked by a warrant from a judge.  Since the Bush junta began to grab this power there have been a plethora of abuses reported over and over in the media and to Congress.  No matter what they say and no matter what excuses they provide, there is no way to avoid these sorts of abuses when the activity the government is engaged in is, itself, an abuse of power.  Anybody with a lick of sense understands this is the inevitable result of granting unchecked power to the government.  It must be put to an end. 

    Now is the time for people to say enough is enough!  The claims of authority to spy on the people of this country without cause and without a warrant must be abandoned permanently because they are illegitimate and represent a threat to the liberty of the people of the United States.  The outrageous claim that citizens ought to have no means of redress when their Constitutional rights are violated must also be abandoned.  The right of the people to be secure in their private communications must be protected unless there is some reason to suspect illegal activity.  Spying fishing expedtitions where the government is trolling for possibilities is absolutely unacceptable and uncalled for and an invitation for abuse as today's news makes crystal clear. 

    The Constitution must no longer be ignored.  It must be honored and the power of the government to spy domestically must be restrained as intended by due process of law and it must also be subject to redress through the courts.  The government cannot and should not be the arbiter of the law and final judge of it's own actions.  That is the power of a police state and it unacceptable in a free society.  Finally, the full weight of the law must be brought to bear on those who would violate it even if they violate it in what they personally believe to be a good cause.  The law must be respected and obeyed by those sworn to enforce it or else it is meaningless.  This is our country.  We need to demand it be run in accordance with our basic law no matter who controls the White House.

    Comments

    Here's a link to the NYT article about the problems with the domestic spying program.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/16/us/16nsa.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1&ref=us


    Well, I don't know what you expect our FISA loving President and his fellow Vichycrats to do about it. We have one party of far right extremists and the other party that enables their extremism every step of the way.

    .


    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin

    "Every Body cries, a Union is absolutely necessary, but when they come to the Manner and Form of the Union, their weak Noddles are perfectly distracted."

    "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

    "Our new Constitution is now established, and has an appearance that promises permanency; but in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes."

    How true this is today about AIG

    "The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction. The inability of colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of George the III and the international bankers was the PRIME reason for the Revolutionary War."

    Franklin reportedly stated

    The Convention began May 13, when all 40,000 Philadelphians had turned out to cheer the arrival of George Washington and by September 18, it was done.


    The people of Philadelphia had heard the rumors that the great work had been completed and a large crowd of anxious citizens had gathered, milling around outside and waiting to hear what had been accomplished.

    The first delegate to emerge was 81 year old Ben Franklin. When the crowd saw him, the buzz of anticipation grew louder. Above the din, a Mrs. Powel, wife of the mayor of Philadelphia, shouted out, "Well Dr. Franklin, what have we got, a monarchy or a republic? Franklin looked at her over his spectacles and responded, "A Republic, madam, IF you can keep it." (emphasis added)

    The American people aren’t fighting to keep it.


    I don't expect the administration or Congress to do anything about it on their own. It's literally up to us to make them take the necessary actions.


    Feinstein is going to do a hearing. Ha! They expect us to fall for that. She's the Queen Bee of appeasement.


    I am not too worried about a police state: police are conspicuous and follow the same laws as everyone else*. The thing to be concerned about is a secret police state.

    * May cause blunt trauma. Void where prohibited.


    Any police state has it's secret element which is, of course, the worst and most despotic arm of the police state.


    nice blog oleeb, i have thought the govement was getting to personnal for awhile now. they need to stay out of our personal lives and let us live


    Abuse (of power)? And from where I sit that defines tyranny...


    I suppose we deserve to be disillusioned. Once a republic becomes an empire, its citizens lose their liberty. And with the technological advances of recent years, the totalitarians can keep the lid on us pretty effectively. There was probably a moment when it was made clear to Mr. Obama that Presidents come and go, but the invisible government rules them all. And any President who thinks otherwise doesn't survive . . . they'll make sure of it. Which is it, I wonder . . . a simple old-fashioned political sell-out . . . or a conspiracy? Probably both.


    Sadly, I think sell out far more likely.


    There was some speculation after the election whether Obama would change the way the surveillance of the American people was being done, en masse and without cause, by our government. And some speculated, myself included, that once the government had the power to do that it would be tough to 'put the genie back in the bottle'. Unfortunately that appears to be the case as not only has our government continued to spy on its people the abuses appear to have been even worse since Obama took office. Makes me think about the concept of 'absolute power' and what it does to people...

    STOP SPYING ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WITHOUT CAUSE!!!! IT IS TYRANNICAL!!!!


    Latest Comments