Donal: Is Occupy Over?
Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR)
dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude
|
Donal: Is Occupy Over? Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR) dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude |
Read |
Silva’s Turn
By Justin Smith
I
I was first alerted to Silva Harotonian’s disaster when a friend of mine sent me an email early in the year about an IREX employee who had been arrested while working in Iran. Silva was arrested for inciting a ‘soft revolution’ in an attempt to overthrow the Iranian government.
My first thought was wow one woman, charged with a soft revolution in Iran, one could only be so honored to be of such importance, such intellectual merit, and influence to be arrested under such terms. But revolution shouldn’t have been the case they gave her, and this charge is nothing but a bunch of meadow muffins as to why she was really arrested.
It’s not difficult to assume that the arrest has nothing to do with espionage or a revolution, and everything to do with religious suppression and shutting down an program funded by the US State department.
Silva Harotonian, 34, an Iranian citizen was arrested on June 26, 2008 while on a two week business trip to Tehran while working for a program called Maternal and Child Health Education and Exchange Program (MCHEEP). MCHEEP is a program based out of Yerevan, Armenia to facilitate sharing knowledge and best practice exchanges for healthcare professionals, and one of many programs that fall under the organization, International Research and Exchanges Board (IREX). These healthcare professionals in Iran spend two weeks at a time in the US.
Silva holds a duel citizenship to both Iran and Armenia and while entering Iran, showed her Iranian passport. At the time of her arrest in June 2008, Silva was an administrative officer for MCHEEP and the only IREX staff member on the ground in Iran at the time. Her responsibilities were limited to administrative duties such as budget management and travel arrangements.
While Silva was preparing Iranian exchange students on the details of their two week stay in the United States, she was arrested, and disappeared for three days. During this time Silva was in solitary confinement till she “confessed” to being a spy. According to the, Iran Human Rights Voice website, Iranian intelligence used a forced video confession to place further pressure on her. Chances are the video tape was just to show in court that she was allegedly guilty.
It was during this time that Silva’s family began to wonder where she was because they hadn’t heard from her in those three days. Her name resurfaced while in Evin Prison from a human rights group, International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran (ICHRI). Iranian officials had put and end to the MCHEEP program if you will, the same week she was arrested.
II
Silva’s trial took about four hours, behind closed doors, with only Iranian media, and Iranian intelligence basically there to threaten her. Then the Iranian government didn’t say a word till Barak Obama’s inauguration, as to send a message to the US government, however cryptic and confrontational.
The Iranian judiciary is a black hole at best, no evidence was ever produced to convince the rest of the world that she was guilty, which leaves only one other option, she’s not. This ostensibly means that Silva was a national and religious threat to a massive country with over 60 million people in it and sentenced to three years in Evin Prison. Still convinced she’s a threat? In a 45 minute interview I spoke with Klara, Silva’s cousin and she remarked, “Are we missing something, I don’t know probably. All we know is there is and innocent person in jail.”
One question keeps repeating in my head, why was she arrested? Still this doesn’t seem to make sense, but I usually default and throw my hands up in the air and tell myself I don’t get humans, I never will. Silva is a Christian, and as far as religious numbers are concerned, she is a minority, and not regarded very highly in as far as the Iranian government is concerned. Silva’s family is concerned for her safety for this reason.
Silva’s attorney whose name wasn’t provided to me, told Silvia’s family they don’t have many options when it comes to the Iranian court system. The first option, which her attorney recommended is to admit she was a spy and get only three years in Prison. The second option is she can insist that she is innocent and get an unreasonably long prison sentence, one with no end in sight.
But until then Silva’s attorney essentially told Klara and her family to keep her out of the media eye at least till she has her court date, turns out freakish media coverage tends to perturb the Iranian government. It was when Silva was sentenced to three years that Klara and Silva’s family finally decided to launch the www.freesilva.org website in January of 2009, they had no other options.
The attorney is an independent criminal attorney who chose the case because he considered Silva not of a political species, but one of benevolence. Klara, “The attorney would have avoided the case altogether if he thought she was politically motivated.” then she added, “Silva studied literature and loved Hamlet, and avoided talking about politics. Charity was a part of her family upbringing”
Silva has been locked up and kept from society for close to a year now. Klara, “Silva’s health is deteriorating, she is having migraines and losing a lot of weight.” Due to her weight and current condition, medication is being restricted for fear that her health condition and the medication will quarrel. Klara, “These things she tries to keep from her mother who visits Silva once a week.”
III
The press release from the US State Department on April, 6 2009 states that, “Silva Harotonian was trying to promote a so-called "Velvet Revolution" in Iran are "baseless" and that her health is deteriorating in prison.” The State Department has appealed to the Iranian authorities for her release.
Since the State Department’s press release I asked what has changed since this. Klara replied, “Not much just that it reached over 150 news outlets, some news outlets are interested, prior to that…nothing.”
In a disappointed and a futile recognition of Silva’s ghost, Klara mentioned with reference to media outlets, “Why do we care, she’s not from the US, not a US citizen” The phone fell silent for a few seconds…”we’ve tried everything.”
Justin Smith is a freelance writer and can be contacted at justinsmiths@gmail.com
Perceptive Dagblog readers know the difference between Obama, Romney and Bush:
Obama NYT today: .how President Obama’s thinking about what he once called “a war of necessity” began to radically change less than a year after he took up residency in the White House....The aide told Mr. Obama that he believed military leaders had agreed to the tight schedule to begin withdrawing those troops just 18 months later only because they thought they could persuade an inexperienced president to grant more time if they demanded it. “Well,” Mr. Obama responded that day, “I’m not going to give them more time.”...Mr. Obama concluded in his first year that the Bush-era dream of remaking Afghanistan was a fantasy...
Mitt Romney, Feb. 2012 : LAS VEGAS -- LAS VEGAS -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Wednesday night blasted President Obama and his administration for “putting in jeopardy” the nation’s military mission by signaling it hopes to end its combat mission in Afghanistan by the middle of 2013.
Appearing at a campaign rally here shortly after landing in Nevada, Romney said Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta’s statement Wednesday that U.S. forces would transition from a combat mission in Afghanistan next year “makes absolutely no sense.”....
George W. Bush, from May, 2003: BBC - "We do not know the day of final victory, but we have seen the turning of the tide... Free nations will press on to victory,"
Bush Afghanistan strategy : Gen. Douglas E. Lute, who had spent the last two years of the Bush administration trying to manage the many trade-offs necessary as the Iraq war consumed troop and intelligence resources needed in Afghanistan, arrived with a PowerPoint presentation. The first slide that General Lute threw onto the screen caught the eye of Thomas E. Donilon, later President Obama’s national security adviser. “It said we do not have a strategy in Afghanistan that you can articulate or achieve,” Mr. Donilon recalled three years later. “We had been at war for eight years, and no one could explain the strategy.”
Mitt Romney isn’t very far into the vice presidential selection process. But according to a dedicated band of conspiracy theorists, the pick is all but a lock: Sen. Marco Rubio.
That’s the current thinking among a worldwide collection of activists who are obsessed with the secretive Bilderberg Group, an alternating roster of global power players who loom as large — if not larger — in the online fever swamps of the fringe as the Trilateral Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76518.html#ixzz1vN5egowz
Aristotle and Plato didn’t agree on much, but they were united in identifying wonder as the origin of their profession. As Aristotle said, “It is owing to their wonder that men . . . first began to philosophise.” This idea appeals to scientists, who frequently enlist wonder as a goad to inquiry. “I think everyone in every culture has felt a sense of awe and wonder looking at the sky,” wrote Carl Sagan in 1985, locating in this response the stirrings of a Copernican desire to know who and where we are.
Yet that is not the only direction in which wonder may take us. To Thomas Carlyle, wonder sits at the beginning not of science, but of religion. That is the central tension in forging an alliance of wonder with science: will it make us curious, or induce us to prostrate ourselves in pitiful ignorance? We had better get to grips with this question before we too hastily appropriate wonder to sell science. That is surely what is going on when pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope are (unconsciously?) cropped and coloured to recall the sublime iconography of Romantic landscape painting, or the Human Genome Project is wrapped in biblical rhetoric, or the Large Hadron Collider’s proton-smashing is depicted as “replaying the moment of creation”. The point is not that such things are deceitful or improper, but that if we want to take that path, we should first consider the complex evolution of the relation between science and wonder.
[....]
Pretending that science is performed by people who have undergone a Baconian purification of the emotions only deepens the danger that it will seem alien and odd to outsiders, something carried out by people who do not think as they do. Daston believes that we have inherited a “view of intelligence as neatly detached from emotional, moral and aesthetic impulses, and a related and coeval view of scientific objectivity that brand[s] such impulses as contaminants”. It is easy to understand the historical origins of this attitude: the need to distinguish science from credulous “enthusiasm”, to develop an authoritative voice, to strip away the pretensions of the mystical Renaissance magus who acquired knowledge through personal revelation. We no longer need these defences, however; worse, they become a defensive reflex that exposes scientists to the caricature of the emotionally constipated boffin, hiding within thickets of jargon.
... We’re trying to harness photosynthesis. A key part of photosynthesis is what happens when the sun goes down. Cells convert CO2 into sugar and fat molecules. And they store the fat to burn as energy to get them through the night ... We’re trying to coax our synthetic cells to ... store far more fat than they actually were designed to do, so that we can harness it all as an energy source and use it to create gasoline, diesel fuel, and jet fuel straight from carbon dioxide and sunlight. This would shift the carbon equation so we’re recycling CO2 instead of taking new carbon out of the ground and creating still more CO2. But it has to be done on a massive scale to have any real impact on the amount of CO2 we’re putting into the atmosphere, let alone recovering from the atmosphere.
... We envision facilities the size of San Francisco. And 10 or 15 of those in this country. We need sunlight, seawater, and non-agricultural land, but you need a lot of photons to drive this. You need a lot of surface area of sunlight to do that. It’s a great use for Arizona. Lots of sunlight there.
... If we can’t get some key scientific breakthroughs within the next couple of years, it probably won’t happen in 10 years. So it’s something that’s really dependent on fundamental science. But we’re already able to do things that were once seen as impossible.
... I think the new anti-intellectualism that’s showing up in politics today is a symptom of our not discussing these issues enough. We don’t discuss how our society is now 100 percent dependent on science for its future. We need new scientific breakthroughs—sometimes to overcome the scientific breakthroughs of the past. A hundred years ago oil sounded like a great discovery. You could burn it and run engines off it. I don’t think anybody anticipated that it would actually change the atmosphere of our planet. Because of that we have to come up with new approaches. We just passed the 7 billion population mark. In 12 years, we’re going to reach 8 billion. If we let things run their natural course, we’ll have massive pandemics, people starving. Without science I don’t see much hope for humanity.
Thanks for posting this, Justin. What a terrible story. Now that Roxana Saberi is free, I see some media sources asking about those who, like Ms. Harotonian and Hossein Derakhshan, are still imprisoned.
This NPR story evaluates the rationale behind the arrests. While many analysts assumed that Ms. Saberi was arrested as some kind of bargaining chip or pawn in a political game, the parallel arrest of Silva Harotonian and others with lower profiles suggests that these arrests constitute "business as usual" in Iran. (Not that I would ever accuse Americans of thinking that the world revolves around them.)
Sadly, it's hard for me to see the State department going to bat for another Iranian prisoner who lacks the good fortune of American citizenship, especially as she'll be upstaged by the journalists in North Korea. But perhaps the media coverage will help. I wish that it could do something for other prisoners whose names we don't even know.
Here's a link to an item I posted a few hours ago at TPM: http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/acanuck/
Follow the link back to the New York Times story, and judge for yourself whether Saberi was, indeed, a spy. It's obvious to me, but maybe that's because I assume any denial of anything that comes out of the State Department is bullshit -- and also because most of my synapses still seem to be functioning.
Is Harotonian some kind of U.S. agent? I don't know zip about her case, but neither do Justin or Genghis. And I am by nature way more skeptical. IREX, the K Street-based institution she worked for, appears to get most of its funding from the U.S. State Department and USAID, both of which seek to further U.S. foreign policy. Policy that hasn't been too friendly to Iran recently. Here's one State Department branch that IREX openly claims as one of its donors: http://www.state.gov/s/inr/
I really dislike Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and we should all hope (and pray, if that works for you) that a moderate candidate defeats him in the presidential election that will be held next month. I also hope Obama's outreach to Iran succeeds, and it plays into a broader move toward Mideast peace. And, of course, that the Likudite crazies don't drag the rest of us into their Armageddon wet dream of a biblical clash of civilizations.
The little bit we can all do is to not buy into the constant anti-Iranian PR-fest. Yes, they have extremists and hard-liners, just as the United States does. The key is for the sane people to outflank the crazies by questioning and rejecting the marketing of war as inevitable.
That link you posted to the State department is totally on the up-and-up, as evidenced by the clear phrase "DIPLOMACY IN ACTION" at the top of the page. Nothing to see here!
Duly noted.
You're welcome. The NPR article is interesting. It's sad really that even someone who is backed by the state dept. is left behind like this. I do find it interesting how everyone can seem to hate media, claim it as liberal (which I'm still clueless what that really means) then all of a sudden care about journalists. I just love the faux humanitarian positions the media outlets take then turn around and support things like torture in fucked off places like Gitmo and black prisons in Jordan. What do they call it, enhanced interrogation techniques? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. Journalists have a dangerous job, so yeah. Its also a cool job.