MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Thought I would put this piece from Tom Engelhardt here. A fairly accurate analysis of America's denial.
From time to time, the U.S. government’s “Intelligence Community“ or IC musters its collective savvy and plants its flag in the future in periodic reports that go under the generic rubric of “Global Trends.” The last of these, Global Trends 2025, was prepared for a new administration taking office in January 2009, and it was typical.
In a field once left to utopian or dystopian thinkers, pulp-fiction writers, oddballs, visionaries, and even outright cranks, these compromise bureaucratic documents break little ground and rock no boats, nor do they predict global tsunamis. Better to forecast what the people you brief already believe, and skip the oddballs with their strange hunches, the sorts who might actually have a knack for recognizing the shock of the future lurking in the present.
As group efforts, then, these reports tend to project the trends of the present moment relatively seamlessly and reasonably reassuringly into the future. For example, the last time around they daringly predicted a gradual, 15-year soft landing for a modestly declining America. ("Although the United States is likely to remain the single most powerful actor, [the country's] relative strength -- even in the military realm -- will decline and U.S. leverage will become more constrained.")
Even though it was assumedly being finished amid the global meltdown of 2008, nothing in it would have kept you up at night, sleepless and fretting. More than 15 years into the future, our IC could imagine no wheels falling off the American juggernaut, nothing that would make you wonder if this country could someday topple off the nearest cliff. Twists, unpleasant surprises, unhappy endings? Not for this empire, according to its corps of intelligence analysts.
And the future being what it is, if you read that document now, you’d find none of the more stunning events that have disrupted and radically altered our world since late 2008: no Arab lands boiling with revolt, no Hosni Mubarak under arrest with his sons in jail, no mass demonstrations in Syria, no economies of peripheral European countries imploding down one by one, nor a cluster of nuclear plants in Japan melting down.
You won’t find once subservient semi-client states thumbing their noses at Washington, not even in 2025. You won’t, for example, find the Saudis in, say 2011, openly exploring deeper relations with Russia and China as a screw-you response to Washington’s belated decision that Egyptian autocrat Hosni Mubarak should leave office, or Pakistani demands that the CIA and American special operations forces start scaling back activities on their turf, or American officials practically pleading with an Iraqi government it once helped put in power (and now moving ever closer to Iran) to please, please, please let U.S. troops stay past an agreed-upon withdrawal deadline of December 31, 2011, or Afghan President Hamid Karzai publicly blaming the Americans for the near collapse of his country’s major bank in a cesspool of corruption (in which his own administration was, of course, deeply implicated).
Only two-plus years after Global Trends 2025 appeared, it doesn’t take the combined powers of the IC to know that American decline looks an awful lot more precipitous and bumpier than imagined. But let’s not just blame our intelligence functionaries for not divining the future we’re already in. After all, they, too, were in the goldfish bowl, and when you’re there, it’s always hard to describe the nearest cats.
Nor should we be surprised that, like so many other Americans, they too were in denial.
Yes a goldfish bowl with mirrored sides that only reflected what you already believed. And as he states in the last sentence, "But I do know one thing: this can’t end well."
Comments
I read it last night; my stars. I think he's right on so many levels, and he uses some great metaphors, doesn't he?
One thing that kept resonnating in my mind was the relative ineffectiveness of our Stellar Military Power; WE don't even have any convictions any longer that it's effective, but we can't stop, almost like a nation suffering some neurological dementia that runs repeats and repeats and can't quit.
The scariest part to me is how declining powers and Empires have a history of becoming increasingly irrational in their confusion and denial; and people suffer even more markedly, at home, within their client-states, and those upon whom they war.
It seems that the Resource Wars will get crazier, too.
by we are stardust on Wed, 04/20/2011 - 1:49pm
Oh more than denial, I think Startdust. A flat out rejection of the current situation. Like some Rod Serling story. Where toward the end you see the main character being wheeled into a mental ward or marched off the be executed. Yelling "This can't be happening !" "This can't be real !". Then having the narrator reveal that the ending was the reality and all previous was the hallucination.
by cmaukonen on Wed, 04/20/2011 - 3:23pm
Well, Admiral Mullen says it was a hard year for ISAF casualties last year, and it will be this year, but they have the Bad Guys on the run now. So at least there's that!
My heart is warmed.
by we are stardust on Wed, 04/20/2011 - 6:31pm
I just couldn't resist.
by cmaukonen on Wed, 04/20/2011 - 6:46pm
And I deserved every bit of it! ;o)
by we are stardust on Wed, 04/20/2011 - 9:09pm
Engelhardt is, as usual, great. The entire post deserves a read.
by acanuck on Wed, 04/20/2011 - 5:43pm
Oh I especially like his ending.
by cmaukonen on Wed, 04/20/2011 - 6:02pm