Donal's picture

    Camoflation 2



    I wanted to see if there were any echoes of Fed Governor Warsh's malaise comments justifying last week's vote. There were, but I was most interested in this French L’Humanité interview of Stanley Aronowitz, Distinguished Professor of Sociology and Urban Education at the City University of New York, from before the midterm elections, hence well before Warsh's comments.

    "Un immense malaise taraude la société américaine"

    Huma: What are the dimensions of the malaise that is moving through society today?

    Stanley Aronowitz: People believe that the economic system has exploded into bits. And they think that the political system is incapable of finding a way out, that there’s no one to defend them, to protect them from the disaster. You know that we have three million families confronted with foreclosure. We have a real level of unemployment that sits above 17% of the active population. And there’s no real political will to come to grips with these ultra-sensitive questions, apart from a few exceptions that confirm the rule, such as the actions taken by Elizabeth Warren, who works in the Obama Administration on consumer protection issues. The government itself is in question, hence the rise in receptiveness to the Republicans’ and the Tea Party’s anti-government or reduced-government demagoguery.

    Huma: Could this terrible malaise become politically dangerous?

    Stanley Aronowitz: I think there is already a rightward push. The emergence of the Tea Party is significant. Not that the people who turn to it are fascists. Many of its adherents are quite simply broke, angry, drowned in the pain of having lost their house or their job or sometimes both. Some are far from being racists or neoconservatives in their heart. Some even voted for Obama two years ago in the hope of change and they’ve simply found the Tea Party as a way of protesting, of howling their frustration and their distress. Fortunately, they lack for the moment any charismatic figure at this time who would drag along a more significant far right movement. But, look out, because the potential is there.

    Aronowitz has a more charitable view of Tea Partiers than I generally read here, and seems to dismiss Palin, who is an opportunist rather than an ideologue, but who certainly is charismatic to some people.

    I also wanted to see if anyone else saw signs of inflation. To a large extent financial entities in the US export inflation by bidding up prices for goods or assets in emerging markets. We also import deflation by paying less (substituting) for foreign goods that are far less expensive than domestically produced goods. But that export and import relies on cheap transportation, and cheap oil. I paid $2.95 / gallon for Regular 87 today, ten cents higher than a week ago, and probably a reflection of oil nearing $90/barrel. Industrial agriculture also relies heavily on cheap diesel fuel for machinery, and on natural gas for fertilizers.

    The Wall Street Journal says that in the face of consumers cutting back, "For the past two years Weis has maintained a "price freeze" on 1,500 staple items" and that Giant Eagle has also been reluctant to raise prices. We've noticed that our Weis in PA is cheaper than any of our stores in MD, where people seem to be making more money, but CNBC says such forbearance can't last.

    No Inflation? Grocery Stores, Gas Prices Tell Different Story

    From grocery stores to gas stations and most other consumer stops in between, price inflation is shaping up to be the biggest economic story ahead.

    Whether it's how much you'll pay for home heating oil or a loaf of bread, don't believe the non-hype: Even if traditional measures of consumer prices aren't yet showing major increases, consumers know what they see.

    "It's not good news from a whole variety of perspectives," says Nicholas Colas, chief investment strategist at BNY ConvergEx in New York. "Food inflation is getting very bad and that's just bad news for the majority of consumers who are still stretched. It's bad news for the 42 million people who are on food stamps."

    Price inflation is coming primarily from upward global pressure on commodities like the multiple grains that go into food production as well as heating oil and gasoline that power the world's growing economies. It's also being driven by a weak dollar, which has continued to fall in value as the Federal Reserve has printed more and more money to pay for programs it hopes will stimulate growth.
    ...

    "It's a headwind" for the economic recovery, [Colas] says. "Near-term, really strong inflation is going to be in a horse race in terms of the Fed's strategy to reinvigorate the economy and increasing prices that will hurt consumer confidence." So even if measures like the Consumer Price Index and the tally of food prices from the Bureau of Labor Statistics don't outwardly show inflation yet, it won't be long.
    ...

    "For most of the year food price inflation has really been pretty tame. But there are indications that inflation is going to be on the rise for the next six to nine months," says Ephraim Leibtag, senior economist at the Department of Agriculture's  Economic Research Service. "There's a bigger concern that with an improved economy that prices are going to rise even more."

    To be sure, shoppers won't be paying more for everything as the upcoming holiday season is expected to show price discounts for goods such as clothing and technology. But for everyday consumer staples like food and energy, the news is not good.
    ...

    Indeed, the surge in commodities has been parabolic.

    The Standard & Poor's GSCI agricultural commodities index is up 25 percent for the year and 16 percent in the last quarter alone. Among the big gainers: cotton (90 percent for the year), coffee (45 percent) and Kansas wheat (31 percent). Sugar's price has zoomed 26 percent in the fourth quarter, while corn, which is used to make so many other products, is up 20 percent for the year.

    Yet BLS data show moves only in select areas when it comes to what consumers see on their grocer's shelves. A loaf of bread, for instance, cost $1.38 in September, up just 2 cents since January. Ground beef also was up only a few cents, to $2.30 a pound, while eggs actually fell 3 cents to $1.75 a dozen.

    On the other hand, butter was the big gainer, jumping to $3.57 a pound, a 29 percent increase for 2010. Coffee rose 36 cents a pound to $4.17, a 9.5 percent gain, while pork chops jumped a quarter a pound to $3.34, an 8 percent increase. Leibtag confirmed it would be dairy and beef where consumers would get hit hardest, while things that aren't consumed directly but are used to make other products will take longer to have an impact.

    "Our forecast for right now is that beef and pork products specifically will be on the higher end of the range," he says. "There are going to be impacts down the road as well for cereals and grains. It just takes longer to get through the system."

    As is his wont, Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge sees more immediate doom:

    How Ben Bernanke Sentenced The Poorest 20% Of The Population To A Cold, Hungry Winter

    As is now becoming very evident, the prices of energy and food products are about to surge, and in many cases have already done so, but courtesy of some clever gimmicks (Wal Mart selling what was formerly 39 oz of coffee as a 33.9 oz product for example) the end consumers haven't quite felt it yet. They will soon. There is a limit to how much every commodity can open limit up before it appears on the SKU price at one's local grocer. And while a marginally declining "core CPI" is irrelevant for this exercise as it measures only items that are completely outside of the scope of everyday life, what will be far more important to end consumers will be the push higher in food and energy costs.



     

     

    Topics: 

    Comments

    Ge Donal...thanks of the good news. The new Jimmy Carter administration -  just what we need.  But really..I do not think the FED or anyone else for that matter...really knows what to do and a socialist approach right now would have the right wingers heads explode.


    Yeah. Things aren't getting better...they're getting worst and we don't even know it yet. There's more than just the average and everday costs to consumers that the Fed is mucking with.

    As Mike Whitney's CounterPunch column suggests, Bernake's QE is nothing more than global monetary terrorism, a form of financial aggression, that is flooding emerging markets with cheap dollars forcing countries to protect their economies. But there's an upside they can't resist.

    With a barrel of crude oil is $85 today, QE in some ways is a global fuel subsidy that enforces more demand for a dwindling resource which drives the price up. For example, at today's exchange rate, the dollar costs Europeans 73 euro cents ($1=0.73euro) so to purchase that barrel of oil only costs 62 euros...that's close to a 23% discount if one considers the dollar and euro values at parity to one another ($1=1euro). So the best way to reduce the global demand for crude oil would be to take away the global fuel subsidy by let the dollar float to parity with the euro and other currencies. But that would interfere with the Fed monetary policy so the public pays for their global policies at the pumps...increased demand for oil because other countries can purchase more because of a cheap dollar which reduces global supplies which increases global costs.

    But what is missing from all the rhetoric is demand for finite resources...what's the annual growth rate for resources? One could easily assume demand is relatively flat, but it's not. It doesn't come in spurts or cyclic as the season...it's steady.

    On Dave' Seaton blog, someone passed on a link to a series of videos by Dr. Bartlett at the University of Colorado at Boulder titled, Artihmetic, Population and Energy. It goes into detail how demands by a growing population for finite resources deplete those resources faster than new ones can be developed over time. Once you view all 8...they're only about 8 to 10 minutes long...you'll see a bigger picture that's being glossed over. It will make it easier to digest what's going on. My take on the videos is population demands are out of touch with the reality of the availability of the resources they use and are unaware of the additional costs they are paying because of their ignorance they are depleating resources faster than they can found.

    http://www.google.com/#q=The+Most+IMPORTANT+Video+You%27Ll+Ever+See+%28p...

     



    Dude, this stuff just strikes me as slightly off the wall. At present, it really really really just IS... deflation. There is excess capacity EVERYWHERE, we're drowning in it, and prices are on the floor.

    1. I know you love food and gas, but how about HOUSING? The housing industry in the US has collapsed. Prices fell, and will fall some more. and housing makes up 30%-40% of household consumption.

    2. Cars. We're miles below peak production, factories and autoworkers certainly not busting at the seams. And prices? Personally, I'm kinda flabbergasted at how low they are.

    3. Energy. Sure, there's gasoline, but you checked out natural gas?? Under $4.00 mmbtu. Not $12, not $8, but $4. This is a fact which causes real pain for the sector I work in, but for consumers, it means lower prices.

    4. Electronics. Anybody think the like-for-like electronics prices are rising? Any body bought a TV lately? A desktop? Seems fairly unfrightening to me, as long as you're not buying the latest model.

    5. And high unemployment means lots of excess capacity must've opened up to close the plants or stores or firms these people just worked in... pulp and paper, steel, and so on. 

    What we have are subsegments of consumption which speculative cash can get into - mostly, oil and commodities. It's not good, in part because of the incredible whipsawing it produces. And since there's lots of spare cash hanging around, not being invested in expanding capacity, it's available to be shoved into commodities. Some is coming in because China/India are pressing demand and prices upward again. Some is just coming in because that's where they think the herd is going. 

    But as of right-now, the argument that we HAVE much inflation, or that it's the primary risk, just seems to me to be not on.


    I other words, it depends on the sector one is talking about. One's point of view as it were.


    Buying a house is cheaper back in central PA, but jobs are hard to find there. Here in MD, where there are some jobs, houses are still high and rents are going up. Cars are cheaper, but they still cost a lot, and I'm terrified at the thought of locking into a five year loan. From the ads I see, I'm guessing a lot of other people are, too. NGas is low because of shale gas, but my apt complex uses gas, and just announced increased heat charges. Electricity is moving up, in MD and PA. Electronics is dead low. I bought a new LCD screen a few months ago, but I wish I hadn't. It is a nice screen, but we got buried with medical bills soon after, and could have used that cash. I'm guessing that people are paying down debt, so the fact that electronic luxuries are cheap doesn't really matter as much. Of course this varies by income level. It's a fantastic time to have a sinecure, a house that's paid off and a lot of money to spend.

    IOW, there is deflation and it does affect the CPI, but it doesn't seem to work to the advantage of anyone that is struggling. After paying all their other bills and with the uncertainty, I think a little bit of inflation in food and fuel would have a big effect on people who are scraping by. I called it StagRentDebtTaxFlation before, but considering medical expenses I'd change it to StagRentDebtMedFlation.


    The psychology of this will have an even longer lasting impact, I think. The fear and insecurity stays with you even after the situation changes for the better. Witness the effects of the last depression where long afterwards people were still very skiddish about the stock market and banks and spending too much.

    Feeling financially insecure will become (if it has not already) the new normal and consumers will behave accordingly.


    That's a really good point. I only met my wife's father once before he died, but when we're looking at buying stuff, she often quotes him, "If I can't eat it, what good is it?"



    P.S. In my own regional news, Sunday's Real Estate section

    the housing market forecast is basically "eh, all things considered not that bad":

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/realestate/07deal1.html?ref=sarah_kershaw

    and the cover story was on Bloomberg and developers betting pretty strongly on the future:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/realestate/07cov.html

    And the projects said to be just completed or planned to be started therein suggests some reasons at least for the attitude of the construction industry here.


    Depends on the part of Florida you are in. In this part, Orlando area, real estate prices are still through the roof and the trades still get pretty much to dollar. Go north to Ocala or south to Arcadia, not so much. But then not much there of any kind. In NY and Ohio it's the same thing. There are areas that are like noting happened then you go to Youngstown and Warren and it's like the depression of the 1930s.


    Even during the depression of the 30s there were areas that did not feel it very much and Hollywood did some of it's best business then as well. So it depends on where you are.


    The construction labor in NYC has to be seen through what business structure is providing the work. For instance when you say "master plumber", you are talking about someone who has a license and can file their work with the building department. So that means he or she is a subcontractor bidding jobs in the most brutal environment I have seen in the city.

    The people who are getting the most bang for buck from such subcontractors (and the GCs that hire them)  are those who provide a volume of work large enough to allow contractors to "keep their house". That means their labor, both in the field and admnistration. A large number of bids are going to firms that are almost paying for the chance to work. Some firms are bidding way below cost to establish a share of future work. So they aren't cutting their prices on the small jobs because it is the only chance they have right now to make up for the losses they are taking on the bigger jobs.

    There is a large pool of hungry tradespeople outside that kind of firm who do not have licenses, insurance, etc. They are usually hired by contractors who are willing to go under the table themselves. It is a lot cheaper but for the actual client to use that labor means there is nothing standing behind the work and if anything goes wrong, the client is holding the bag.


    And those unlicensed tradespeople don't have workmen's comp, so if they get hurt, they either eat the bills or sue the client.


    Thanks for getting into that.

    I want to take advantage of commenting again to clarify.

    Mainly I was getting into all of that because it seems like in many locales, there are neither signs of clear deflation nor inflation, but a kind of waiting game in troubled times. And the high national unemployment rate means for uncertaintly for anyone It strikes me even more when I see Donal come up with all these posts searching for the correct analytic title and terms to describe what's happening. And then lots of people saying: no, Donal, that's wrong, it's the opposite.

    Wink

    P.S. Meantime my tiler (a legal Mexican immigrant) hasn't called me back, as he promised to do by 7pm EST, to tell me if he decided that he's coming to finish his work at my place tomorrow. He's stringing me along, said he would confirm, but apparently found something better to do and doesn't think my schedule is important. He's done this several times. I have to call him and ask 3 times if he's coming, he decides at the last minute.  No lectures, please, I know this is an anecdotal and means little in the big scheme of things. But seems to me that there were a lot more "hungry" handyman and day laborers available around my parts of the woods a year or so ago, not so much anymore. And my brother's stories of not having seen much improvement on the availability front (he's employing a ton more than me on a regular basis,) just hit home. BTW, I am willing to pay going rates. Just not cash, and many seem to expect cash for small jobs. To me, several grand at $30 to $80 per hour depending upon the skill is not small--it hurts to come up with it. Yet all those who have worked for me, they clearly think it's small and do not seem grateful for the work, rather, they seem to think they are doing me a favor. Actually, I have fear of offending them, have to say thank you hundreds of times and have to fear asking them questions lest they think I am a problem client. It's just that my experiences here in the Bronx don't match up to the stories from the Great Depression yet. I can live with it, not complaining, just reporting. It actually gives me hope that things are not as bad as I read on blogs...


    Frankly the stag is so bad now that it hardly matters which flation goes along with it. Inflation will cost you the little money you have, deflation will keep you out of work.

    Too bad I can't send my stepson - he's a great tiler and faux-finish painter.


    I really wish before people would join in the whole Right-Wing argument that inflation is either occurring or about to occur, that they'd check the likely medicine we're going to get once the diagnosis of "inflation" is agred upon.

    Namely.... Higher interest rates, and reduced government spending.

    I'm sorry folks, but there are ALWAYS regional differences. ALWAYS.

    If the issue is middle/working-class JOB INSECURITY, or an INCOME SQUEEZE for that same group, then let's identify that and see what policies can help it. But to just label it "inflation" because some prices are going up in some places, could easily result in the worst of all possible worlds.

    Worst. Namely, underlying deflation... now being driven into a death spiral... by rising interest rates and cuts to government spending and transfers.


    I don't think you can reduce this to regional differences. You can't take advantage of deflation in the price of cars and gizmos if you're stretched just to put gas in the used car you have and to put food on the table. The suggestion that because other people can means it isn't a problem sounds more like a right-wing argument to me than concern for the ones that can't.

    I think what is actually driving the deflation of certain markets is that more and more people don't have the income to keep buying these goodies, and aren't willing to go into predatory debt to keep the merry-go-round spinning. If we could borrow umpty-ump billion to put people to work rebuilding our infrastructure, I'd be all for it. But all I see resulting from the QE is more currency manipulation. I'm not hearing that from the right, I'm hearing it from the left.


    I don't follow CPI enough, but if what you're saying is that the "basket of goods" that hard-up people buy is inflating in price more than the basket bought by richer folks, well... that may be. I don't actually know, though I suspect that somewhere on the CPI site or elsewhere, that's been studied. So I guess I'd just want to see some evidence, marshalled in a systematic manner - where as I feel the last couple of blogs have been chasing a moving target a bit.

    And yes, deflation has a lot to do with people not being able to buy, and not being able to - or willing to - go into debt. In short, THAT'S THE PROBLEM. And as prices fall, other businesses lower THEIR prices to compete, and must then reduce their wages, and ultimately, lay offs occur, and so on, as we circle down the drain.

    As for QE, it's not my first choice, but with fiscal policy now dead and buried, I'd take as much QE as possible. 


    Latest Comments