MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
“Our country’s greatest strengths are the diversity of its people and the principles of equal dignity and inclusion that unite us all. There are troubling events planned in our state in the coming weeks. This is an incredibly painful and difficult time for millions of Californians. For those who are wondering where we stand – the ACLU of California fully supports the freedom of speech and expression, as well as the freedom to peacefully assemble. We review each request for help on a case-by-case basis, but take the clear position that the First Amendment does not protect people who incite or engage in violence. If white supremacists march into our towns armed to the teeth and with the intent to harm people, they are not engaging in activity protected by the United States Constitution. The First Amendment should never be used as a shield or sword to justify violence.”
- Abdi Soltani, Executive Director of the ACLU of Northern California
- Hector Villagra, Executive Director of the ACLU of Southern California
- Norma Chávez-Peterson, Executive Director of the ACLU of San Diego & Imperial Counties
Comments
Good! They really need to have this argument. Similar fine tuning needed on terrorist plotting issues.
by artappraiser on Thu, 08/17/2017 - 3:26am
The NYT has an op-ed on this ACLU hate speech/ACLU topic today, and, as usual, 99% of the commenters have no f**ing idea what the ACLU involvement was with this Nazi/KKK march in Charlottesville.
There was never a denial of the right to march, REPEAT there was NEVER any move to stop the march.
The ACLU became involved when the city, FOR SAFETY REASONS, decided to relocate the march to McIntire Park which is a huge green grassy park at the edge of town.
The city said the downtown Emancipation Park area was too small, and the streets too narrow to keep people safe and under some control. They were right.
The Virginia ACLU literally said to the court "there is no proof of safety concerns" and a judge agreed. link on news report from last week.
I emailed the Virginia ACLU and asked them to not second guess public officials determination of safety measures in the future, that some might say they had blood on their hands, They gave no response.
by NCD on Thu, 08/17/2017 - 12:01pm
The Virginia ACLU needs to explain its behavior.
by rmrd0000 on Thu, 08/17/2017 - 12:48pm
Why the ACLU is adjusting its approach to “free speech” after Charlottesville
The ACLU positioned itself to lead the resistance. Now its deepest traditions could be at stake.
by artappraiser on Mon, 08/21/2017 - 4:58pm