MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Comments
The sad thing is that at the big money contemporary art auctions (and anything appealing to the Asian market, I might add) it's not just Arab princes doing this. Has been going on for a decade and gets worse all the time. The rich "collectors" figure: if I buy at auction instead of from dealers, I won't get ripped off by a retail price, and then they bid against each other to many times retail. So there is no longer any real barometer for values for one-of-a-kind stuff. Totally opposite the historic role of auctions. Suffice it to say: appraising the high value stuff has become an exercise in absurdity.
Meanwhile, on the other end of the market, prices continue to go down because every day there are 100's of internet auctions with tons of stuff on offer and more coming as boomers die or downsize and liquidate. Most markets have prices back down at 1980's levels. And galleries and antique shops are closing because of the Amazon effect, they can't pay the overhead. So everyone offers things on the internet, where buyers do the pig in a poke thing without connoisseurship, without being able to see in person or touch. So imaging is all.
by artappraiser on Mon, 04/02/2018 - 2:23pm
Comes to mind back in the late 80's of Reagan rich, there was a similar-but-different effect. The Wall St. types and Japanese rich would bid against each other on some things for ego, it was a pissing game. That's not what's going on now, it really is just stupidity, where if they want something, they figure auctions will protect them as to paying a fair price and buying from a dealer won't. So they run each other up. Constantly it really strikes anyone who follows the hot markets as insane. It's like this: what are they thinking? Who is going to pay that price for like a Modigliani or a Koons in 20 years when it comes time to pass it on to someone else? What goes up to ridiculous levels must come down, right? Not yet, we're not seeing that, rather we are seeing: this is worth more than money is, whatever I have to pay for it. Boggles the mind, especially when it's coming from people who are supposedly wise about financials. So then you think: they are not really wise about financials, this world economy thing, it's all strings and mirrors, religious faith....
by artappraiser on Mon, 04/02/2018 - 2:21pm
Ok, he traded it for a $500 billion yacht, but reports are the yacht is decorated with crappy neo-whop art.
by NCD on Mon, 04/02/2018 - 2:29pm
Well that actually makes "fair trade" sense precisely because: every scholar with expertise in Leonardo agrees it's a real crappy Leonardo! (Ain't much left of the original, is mostly restoration.)
by artappraiser on Mon, 04/02/2018 - 2:38pm
Wait, wasn't that Charles II and the Stuarts? how'd we get there from the Italian Renaissance?
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 04/02/2018 - 4:37pm
you're punning actually made me think about how nobody rich gives a crap anymore about old Britannia's art when in the first iteration of American super nouveau riche, circa 1910, it was all the rage. For example, prices for the 18th-centuy English artist Gainsborough ("Blue Boy" sold to railroad tycoon Huntington) have to this day, adjusted for inflation, never equaled those paid back then by newly wealthy Americans. And Americans no longer try to buy British titles. But Saudi princes are buying what they think are icons of western religious civilization, in this case Italian Renaissance Roman Catholic, go figure. Simpatico with the Medici?
by artappraiser on Mon, 04/02/2018 - 5:53pm
Well, probably there's crucifix envy at work (rather than simply vanishing in air - too much to leave to imagination) and the Muslims' general abhorrence of the painted figure as blasphemous to work against, a forbidden pleasure. And besides the steady decline of the British blue bloods, there's the faddish emergence of the Grandma Moseses and other hyped creatures of the modern marketing age. But more than simpatico, I was thinking "copacetic" - somehow that song from JC Superstar, "Everything's Alright" comes to mind. Frankly, I think Europe (& the US) blew it by not emphasizing a path to the EU or similar during the Arab Spring - could have been institutional and investor class, rather than boats full of refugees. Now we're going to get the Silicon Mideast version, parity through acquisition, which never quite works - all these tech companies that failed trying to buy their way to pole position, instead blowing tons of money unsatisfactorily.
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 04/02/2018 - 6:13pm
for those who are interested, this is by far the best article yet on the Salvator Mundi, this is the real deal of how it happened and what it is:
https://www.vulture.com/2019/04/salvator-mundi-leonardo-da-vinci.html
I was so impressed how the reporter got everything right. Yet I had never heard of him nor seen anything by him concerning art or the art market, so I went to check him out. He has this "about me" page that explains he specializes in deep dive long form pieces explaining specialized worlds.
http://www.matthewshaer.com/about
Judging from this one, he's damn good at that. Will be watching for his work from now on.
by artappraiser on Wed, 04/17/2019 - 4:42pm