MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
On Sunday night, mere hours before the fourth Democratic debate, Sanders tried to head off Clinton's attacks by releasing his plan. Only what he released isn't a plan. It is, to be generous, a gesture towards a future plan. To be less generous — but perhaps more accurate — this is a document that lets Sanders say he has a plan, but doesn't answer the most important questions about how his plan would work, or what it would mean for most Americans. Sanders is detailed and specific in response to the three main attacks Clinton has launched, but is vague or unrealistic on virtually every other issue. The result is that he answers Clinton's criticisms while raising much more profound questions about his own ideas.
Comments
by barefooted on Mon, 01/18/2016 - 1:58am
It's because he hasn't developed an expertise on the subject and maybe he really does believe it will be "that simple" to change the system completely. The Krugman article Oxy directed me to this morning really does explain it all.
If we really think about this, what is it about the Sanders plan that people are attracted? I think they really do believe it will be somewhat free to them, and can be achieved just by raising taxes on the wealthy and raising corporate taxes. I wonder about that kind of selfish warped thinking? Healthcare is a shared responsibility, no one gets out of paying for it. Individual taxes will increase and it will be a dramatic increase. I wonder how one does convince the American public to do that. Middle class taxes will rise the most, and if we don't begin to regulate other aspects of the system first, those taxes are going to be incredibly steep. There is absolutely no way it will happen, Republicans will have the upper hand in the tax debate on that one, and the middle class will still be made to feel that they are getting screwed while everyone else is getting some benefit.
We can't start over. That is an insane notion and is an indication that Mr. Sanders and his supporters don't really understand the nature of the large organizations. .
I also find it interesting that Sanders would rather make a statement with his healthcare legislation that he has introduced yet again, than to have actual impact with legislation i.e. regulation of hospital costs, etc. I understand he is introducing his Medicare for all Legislation for the 20th time. That sounds an awful lot like Republicans who continue to re-introduce legislation repealing PPACA, knowing it can never happen. In that he also has recently decided the program cannot be run by their respective states and moved on the a system run by the feds further indicates he does not have a real grasp of what it is going to take to continue our move to get everyone access to healthcare.
by tmccarthy0 on Mon, 01/18/2016 - 10:14am
"If we really think about this, what is it about the Sanders plan that people are attracted?" - it's like the flat tax - ephemeral in its beauty and simplicity, the Holy Grail of wingnuts (especially flat-lined at zero), and just begging for exceptions to start bending it out of shape immediately.
I currently have single payer, and it's fine, but there are certainly costs involved with it, and there are limits to what we can get - *even if we want to pay for certain extras, we can't* - hasn't been a huge issue - only 1 item I can think of - but if I wanted some of that Cadillac love, I might be disappointed. A lot of younger folks get by without insurance - a risk, but not as high as later - but saddling them with that tax burden will likely change some of their life options. Yes, I think everyone assumes it will be rather free or at least painless.
Ideally we could streamline our system and stop paying twice as much as everyone else. In practice, I doubt we'll get there.
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 01/18/2016 - 11:03am
The passage and implementation of Obamacare with the SCOTUS dictate that citizens can be forced to buy private insurance drove the last nail into the coffin and murdered the idea of ever seeing universal healthcare coverage in the US.
Bernie's dragging this corpse back on display reminds me of Weekend at Bernie's crossed with Groundhog Day and it's just as much a fantasy and a fraud as the rest of his progressive nostrums that will cease to exist as soon as the silly season is over.
by Peter (not verified) on Mon, 01/18/2016 - 12:23pm
In the interests of fair play, I am notifying all that I decided to delete my earlier rather childish reply to this post which was made in the heat of anger. Instead, for now, I will merely post this: The cited Vox article is as misleading and ultimately dishonest as the Clintons' claim that Bernie wants to take away CHiP, Medicare, etc. I will post a detailed rebuttal to Klein's attack on Berniecare after I've done it.
by HSG on Tue, 01/19/2016 - 1:46pm
Hesiod at Kos has already done it. Glad that set the record straight.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 01/19/2016 - 2:08pm