MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
If even half of this article is true, I don't see how Bernie Sanders can move beyond it. This may well be the thing that brings him down. I don't say that happily. I want Bernie to keep spreading his message to Americans, but even given the mixed messages people on our side were getting about the volatile regime-changes in Central America and elsewhere, these revelations may be insurmountable for him.
Comments
Interesting. Michael Moynihan seems a bit unhinged in his writing style, I have to admit, but Bernie will have a hard time explaining the "nuance" if there is any, of his support for the Sandinistas without having to educate the general electorate about decades of Nicaragua's history.
I mean, in a way, I understand where Sanders is coming from. The Sandinistas were the direct result of U.S. policy and were forced to extremes because the U.S. was actively backing a counter-rebellion there and one could easily argue that the Sandinistas were better than the dictatorship they booted from power and that, had the U.S. been supportive of them, might have been a reliable force for good in the world and free from the Soviet orbit.
Of course, we could say the same about Cuba. Castro and Guevara didn't start out bad. They were heroes. Batista, the dictator they knocked from power, was bad. Castro and Guevara looked to the U.S. for help almost immediately but were rebuffed because U.S. corporate assets were nationalized. Had the U.S. not turned Castro away, Cuba's history would have been quite different.
But none of this is a discussion a presidential candidate wants to have with the country in 2016. Might just be me, but I don't see a country eager to re-litigate the Cold War right now and if somebody were forced to try, it's hard to see where the conversation can even begin. Seriously, when's the last time you discussed Nicaragua as a foreign policy issue?
by Michael Maiello on Sun, 02/28/2016 - 1:41pm
The Sandinistas were a reaction to Somoza, hardly a star on the Latin American body politic. It's hard to complain about communist/socialist confiscation when the capitalist caudillo before owned 90% of the country's property before. Reagan of course unleashed a tsunami of badass insurgents who didn't care a whit about human rights - with atrocities in El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras... Yes, terrorism is what we'd call it today - if done by Muslims.
Since then Nicaragua's been pretty well neglected by us, thanks partially to Jesse Helms' unfriendly ways, and just because without the Soviets the region ws no longer any kind of interest. After an interesting run from Chamorro cleaning things up a bit (her husband was likely killed by Somoza), Ortega now gets regularly re-elected, kind of stuck in the 70's with no way out.
Don't think I condemn Bernie's activism there - it was certainly policy overreach, including the Iran-Contra deal trying to overthrow the Sandinistas. I'm not completely sympathetic with Ortega, but again, they were getting rid of the horrid old regime. We blew the Arab Spring, and blew any awakening in Latin America.
Update: actually finished the article, rather worse than first glance. Don't expect Bernie to make inroads with the Cuban electorate at least.
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 02/28/2016 - 3:57pm
There has been hints of this for a couple of months, snippets in news stories, but this is the first I've seen with much of it gathered together in one article. I suspect there is even more that would be found with republican oppo research. Within the context of US support for right wing dictators, right wing militias, and CIA backed coups this probably won't be an issue among Bernies white liberal supporters or even among liberal Hillary supporters like me. But as you pointed out the amount of education required to explain this to the average voter in the general is likely insurmountable. Moynihan might seem unhinged today but if the republicans start pushing it he will seem like the voice of reason. This is what many have been worried about for the general if Bernie gets the nomination.
by ocean-kat on Sun, 02/28/2016 - 2:52pm
For me it has been many times over the last five weeks. I am writing this from the Managua. Moynihan is completely full of crap minus only the crap he spewed in that article.
by A Guy Called LULU on Sun, 02/28/2016 - 9:35pm
Care to offer some examples? Would at least update us on what's happening Managua way
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 02/29/2016 - 12:08am
If I do try to give a substantive response it wil have to be later. Today is my last day in country and I expect ot be quite busy. Tomorrow is a long travel day with several connections and then lots of business piled up at home after a week away. Another problem is the lack of internet posting of articles and information from the Late seventies, and the 80's that can be linked to as validation of observations and evidence supporting opinions.
One potential thing that might play out favorably involves my current location. Managua has almost nothing to offer tourists and so lodging is very cheap even by Nicaraguan standards. We chose our current place to stop early on and as an end point to our trip close to the airport of our departure. I am staying in the home of an Nicaraguan ambassador to one of the other Central American countries. It is being run as a hotel by his son who grew up largely in Europe as the son of a European mother who worked here as a doctor from 1980 until 1990 and married a soldier of the revolution. He speaks fluent English and we have had several conversations which lead me to believe he might be willing to talk candidly about the feelings of different [monetary] classes of Nicaraguans regarding the revolution and its change one way or the other to their lives. Of course there might be many reasons he would be reticent to do so even if the chance comes up and if I have decided that I can broach the subject diplomatically.
I am hopeful that Monihan's article is critiqued by someone qualified to do so authoritatively and with the skill to pick apart what I referred to as crap and becomes available online because I am so firmly convinced that most of it is worse than that adjective would indicate.
by A Guy Called LULU on Mon, 02/29/2016 - 8:58am
I'm more interested in your personal observations & what you pick up from people you meet -
I can go scanning the internet for articles on my own ;-)
And I thought discussing politics was the main hobby in Central America...
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 02/29/2016 - 9:11am
First a bit of background. I My first trip there began in the USVI from where I crewed aboard a 27foot sailboat through the canal and up the coast of Panama to Golfito, Costa Rica. The owner/captain, his brother, and I stayed there for a week or so enjoying a New year’s Eve with other sailors and travelers and venturing out a ways on short day trips. Costa Rica was beautiful and I had nothing but good experiences there. I then left the boat as planned and began working my way north through Central America. I soon found myself on the “gringo trail” which consisted of the common route where travelers going north questioned and visited with those going south and vice versa about places to stay, things to see, and the experiences they had in the various places. I hooked up with an experienced traveler from Sweden just as I was leaving Costa Rica on a bus for Nicaragua.
I arrived in Nicaragua with many preconceptions and some expectations but I also tried to see the country with a ‘beginner’s mind’ and be open to evidence that might alter my view. I had followed the political situation in that country since the mid-seventies and somewhat closely since the election of Reagan. I was convinced that Reagan was stupidly wrong about Nicaragua and criminally wrong in his actions against that unfortunate country. By January of 1989 the majority of US Americans had come to agree though not nearly as vehemently as me. Congress also agreed as did virtually all of Europe. The World Court also agreed and had ruled against the US and in favor of Nicaragua. Nicaragua was over-run with Central Americans, Europeans, Canadians, and a relatively small number of US citizens who were mostly organized into “Brigades” of “Brigadistas” doing volunteer work in support of the country and its new Sandinista government. There was a bit of partying too done with a bit of revolutionary fervor and some of my favorite people I met at “Sara’s”, a beer bar in Managua occupied nightly by brigadistas from everywhere who drank all the beer every night and many of whom then went looking for the second best place to drink all their beer too, were the Cubans.
By 1989 the revolution which had thrown out Somoza was mostly consolidated but the new government was still under the oppression of sanctions by the US and attacks by Contras trained at the “School of the Americas” at Ft. Benning Georgia and still being funded secretly and illegally by the US which did so partly with funds derived from active participation in drug trafficking.
If the horror stories told by our government to justify and create support for our attack on Nicaragua were anywhere close to true it would have been obvious to enough of the foreigners in that country who had free and unguided access to everything everywhere. I never heard of any exception except to the inside of some military bases. I took pictures of some great graffiti on the exterior wall of a base and some shots through the gate and was only politely asked to not take any more when I put my camera slightly through the bars of the gate to get some interior shots.
Leaving Nicaragua I continued north. We went through Honduras by the most direct route to El Salvador but I had a year old guide book and was not aware that the rules had been changed and that I could not get into El Salvador without a visa which would not be issued at the border. This was a rule no doubt instituted at the request/demand of the US government. I temporarily split from the Swedish guy who could enter and went on a long circuitous route back through Honduras where I saw many signs of military dominance of its citizens. Numerous times my bus would be stopped and occasionally young men who obviously didn’t want to go were pulled off and led to large tents with sides rolled up because of the heat which revealed cots with many other men sitting. No signs at that distance of any activity, just sitting. I was never questioned or asked to even show my passport.
I left Nicaragua with all my beliefs of US malfeasance confirmed and with a very strong feeling that the Nicaraguan people deserved our help rather than our boots on their neck.
Jumping forward all these years I have finally returned and reloaded my impressions. The country is still poor but its infrastructure looks much better. It is said that you can drink the water virtually everywhere though I didn’t test that too strongly. I brushed my teeth with it and drank what I was offered with my meals a few times and suffered no ill affects but almost always drank bottled water or beer. My impressions are just that, impressions, as I only have ‘survival’ Spanish and certainly cannot carry on a meaningful conversation in that language and there is not much English among the people there except for the many tourists and expatriates and sometimes English at my level of Spanish among workers in the tourist industry. The transportation system is amazing in that you can go anywhere by bus very cheaply. We rode buses all around Managua, for instance, for two and a half Cordobas at 28 Cordobas to the dollar. The buses, called by foreigners ‘chicken buses’ never pass a stop regardless how full and usually stop between stops if you wave soon enough. I think most would be surprised how packed a bus can get but my friend who worked in San Francisco and commuted daily on the BART to Haywood said it was the same there. Between cities was also amazingly cheap and within cities the cab fare was amazingly low. As always and everywhere people are advised to know the cab fare before getting in but I rarely followed that advice and the worst price I paid for that ’mistake’ was ten Cordobas above the common fare. The routine was to know the general direction of your destination and stand beside the road watching for cabs going that way. A cab which probably already had some passengers would stop if it had room so some trips were not direct but that was part of the fun. Almost every cab driver was genuinely friendly, like almost Nicaraguan in any encounter, and were patient with us gringos when we had trouble communicating our wishes. A couple times they drove to a roadside business where they knew a person who could translate. At the end of a trip I almost always waited for full change for the money I had given the driver even if it was only very slightly over the amount of the fare. In five weeks of getting around this way I [almost] never noticed any hesitancy to give me the full amount of change or any indication I was being sweated for a tip. Exceptions were extremely rare. I would then, with extremely rare exceptions, tip them. The usual fare within a city was 15 to twenty Cordobas each, fifty-five to ninety cents, mas o menos. Usually twenty to thirty for the two of us.
Accommodations, arranged mostly through Air BnB or Hostel World ranged from excellent to mediocre value for the money and my total amount spent for the trip, not counting a frequent flyer miles ticket, was about eleven hundred dollars for five weeks sharing the cost of rooms with private baths. It could have been a fair amount less and with long term room rates and preparing our own meals could have been much less.
Beyond my surface observations I will pass on what I was told by the host in Managua that I mentioned above. It turns out that he had studied political science in Europe and had at one time thought of entering politics. He said that the Sandinistas would easily win an election today and that would likely remain the case for the foreseeable future. From this point my statements are what I hope is a fair reflection of what he said.
The Sandinista government has done much to help the general population of the country and continue to do so but they are also, like I believe most governments to be, too inbred and fill too many government positions through patronage of friends, relatives, and powerful supporters rather than through recognition of qualifications and history of effective service. Danielle Ortega is most interested in playing on the international stage and leaves most of the power of internal governance to his wife. She is wasting money that is desperately needed elsewhere on things such as the ugly steel trees which are lit at night at great expense for very costly electricity. [The stupidity of much money spent on ugly 'art' was just one example by my host of what drove him nuts about Mrs. Ortega, mostly it was her having too much power from an unelected position even though that power was not being abused to forcefully crush dissent and was used in many helpful ways that benefited the common people]
She owns the company that builds them. [I am not sure of any details of that statement, it was thrown out with a laugh and no details were pursued] Another leftist political party to help keep the government more honest would be a good thing but cannot expect to have any chance until a generation that venerates “The Heroes and Martyrs” of the revolution has passed on. The poor class controls who are elected because elections are fair and honest and so right now parties on the right do not have a chance of gaining more than a little representation. A more rightist government won one election, power was handed over peacefully for the first time in Nicaraguan history, and the people got a taste of what austerity measures recommended by the IMF and the World Bank felt like to an already poor country and now the Sandinistas are firmly back in power through the ballot. Now my host would like to see an alternative on the left but would still vote for the Sandinistas [I believe] rather than a right wing party.
My host was not surprised at what I told him about the article by Moynihan but thought most of the accusations and conclusions of Moynihan, especially those of war crimes by the revolution and the history of the Sandinistas, are absurd and pointed out that those charges of crimes did apply correctly to the Contras, [the ones trained by our government to attack local leaders and infrastructure so as to bring down the government chosen and fought for by its people].
Some more random thoughts: Nicaragua is the second foreign country I have ever been in where I was not approached either to buy dope or to be offered the services of a prostitute. The other is India. A building in Managua was pointed out by our host as the former headquarters of a drug cartel which was crushed four or five years ago and is now a police station. He said there are no powerful drug gangs in the country.
Almost every building, including residences, of any size is fortified with steel fences, bars on the windows and doors, and concertina wire around the walls and roof line. This includes those recently built or under construction.
When we asked we were told that there could be some danger of getting mugged or harassed at night in some areas and so should take a taxi after dark. We ignored this advice in most of the places we stayed and only took a taxi as a precaution one evening when we were a long walk from our room in Grenada and the power went out leaving everything very dark. It came back on about the time we got to our room. Nobody we talked to anywhere had had a crime problem or heard first hand of one or at least it never came up among travelers we talked to.
I will probably add more thoughts as they come to mind and will be happy to answer what questions I can when time allows.
by A Guy Called LULU on Thu, 03/03/2016 - 11:50am
Thanks for this - could you repackage it in a blog or the Creative Corner? Will get lost as a comment.
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 03/03/2016 - 11:57am
I agree. It would make a great blog post.
by Ramona on Thu, 03/03/2016 - 6:11pm
He added it to a previous blog post of his on-topic. It's great!
by barefooted on Thu, 03/03/2016 - 7:21pm
Great response to the Moynihan hit piece. Sanders willingness to oppose the U.S. policy at the time took courage and proves that he is a man with deeply held principles.
by moat on Thu, 03/03/2016 - 6:48pm
Yes, I agree he is full of crap. I also don't see it an issue in this election because people have no idea what went on in Central America and right now this election is about domestic issues and trade. This is an anti- establishment election year.
by trkingmomoe on Tue, 03/01/2016 - 6:30am