It's the cliched double bell curve. There's always some overlap. I'm sure there are some women that are cued visually and are turned on by a dick pic as much as many men are by tit pics. Though it does seem being cued visually is more common among men. I suppose it's good to occasionally point out that some women like to look at dicks. But there doesn't seem to be much more interesting information in the article. It's just one woman's opinion of how to make the pic more aesthetically pleasing. We all could give our individually takes on why one pic is better than another or why we like this porn flick more. A massive survey giving us the spread of opinions might be interesting but one person's take is unimportant and boring.

Peracles, I just remembered, when I was studying to be a Nurse Practitioner, we took some classes with medical students.  There was a much anticipated "Sex Week," when we saw pics and movies of all things imaginable to do with sex, sex problems, and obsessions with sex.  The highlight of the week was the screening of Misty Beethoven, which was a high quality porn film.  I have forgotten much about it but I do remember that Misty had many naked male butlers who served drinks with trays, and little towels draped over their (erections).  Also there was a scene on an airplane, and rather than a smoking or non-option, there was a fu**ing or non-option.

the point of the whole exercise was to make us unable to be embarrassed by what might come our way in practice.  I haven't thought about that in years, but it may very well have colored my reaction to this article.  I could say more, but I think I'd better not, lol!