MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
As one digs deeper into the national character of the Americans, one sees that they have sought the value of everything in this world only in the answer to this single question: how much money will it bring in?"
Alexis de Tocqueville
letter to Ernest de Chabrol. June 9, 1831
Comments
I have barely watched or listened to Big Ed since he left talk radio in June 2014. Fortuitously, Ed, Randi Rhodes, and I all dropped off terrestrial radio within a two-week span. I continued doing internet radio for two years and stopped my show last month. Randi took a two-year hiatus but is now doing a two-hour show on Progressive Voices.
Although nobody's ever said it, I think Ed quit because he dropped an f-bomb, which his producer failed to stop from being broadcast, on an irritating caller the previous March. At that time, the FCC was cracking down hard on stations that broadcast anything arguably obscene. My suspicion is that Ed's distributor - Dial-Global - and maybe Ed himself cut a deal with the FCC that if Ed stepped down, the Commission wouldn't pursue obscenity complaints against Ed, Dial-Global, and all the stations that aired the obscenity.
I was very disappointed because Ed has always been my favorite radio host - besides myself. Not coincidentally, he was the host least likely to toe the Democratic party line. Ed was the only one of the five big radio libs during Obama's first term - Bill Press, Stephanie Miller, Thom Hartmann, Schultz, and Rhodes - to take on the President when he failed to stand up for working people. He also spoke with more progressive critics of Obama than any of the other hosts who tended - then and now - to make excuses and apologies for drone warfare, proposed cuts to social security, and the firing of Shirley Sherrod.
My sense was he never got on well with the MSNBC suits because of his penchant for fighting for the guys and gals who in his words "shower after they get home from work" even when doing so led to conflict with the Democratic establishment.
So Ed's history shows that he has fearlessly taken on Democratic powerbrokers despite the preference of his bosses that he train all of his fire on Republicans and defend, or at a minimum ignore, the Debbie Wasserman Schultzes, Rahm Emanuels, and Evan Bayhs. Accordingly, I am suspicious of a Politico article that, without links to audio or transcripts, slams him for allegedly carrying Putin's water.
by HSG on Mon, 07/25/2016 - 10:48am
Good points Hal.
I watched Ed twice while on vacation years ago. It was entertaining, yet not enough to bother again.
TV News from any source, is the worst place to go for facts and context for those facts. Its all about eyeballs and money.
A boringly well run progressive government, meeting the nation's and the people's issues effectively, held accountable by educated, engaged and informed voters, might kill the corporate US TV News business. It's probably their worst fear. So we get profitable empires like conflict provoking, fact averse, Fox News.
by NCD on Mon, 07/25/2016 - 1:18pm
Ed Schutlz was a Republican for much of his life, until he married his second wife who is a social worker I believe. It is interesting to me that you would trust someone who was a Republican for that long, I think you might know why I am asking you this? But you know Goldwater...
by tmccarthy0 on Tue, 07/26/2016 - 1:00am
Hillary's record since she became a Democrat is that of a cautious neo-liberal neo-conservative. While she changed parties half a century ago, her political values haven't changed all that much. When Ed Schultz changed parties, he changed his actions. For the past 15 years, he has been using his words and influence on behalf of poor, working, and middle-class people. That is the difference.
by HSG on Tue, 07/26/2016 - 6:07am
I have deleted the following discussion thread with the same old sniping between Hal, Rmrd, and PP. Let's talk about something else, thank you.
by Michael Wolraich on Tue, 07/26/2016 - 10:28am
So please delete Hal's as well, thanks.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 07/26/2016 - 10:30am
Hal responded to tmc's question, to which you jumped in with a personal attack accusing him of "flailing" and something about "turds" followed, inevitably, by rmrd's psychoanalysis of Hal. So how about you focus a little less on Hal. I will continue to try to keep Hillary and Bernie bashing to a minimum.
by Michael Wolraich on Tue, 07/26/2016 - 10:51am
"flogging". The other was a common expression for raining on a parade.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 07/26/2016 - 11:11am
THE 'THINGY' DOES NOT WORK.
The proper link should be linked as such
http://driftglass.blogspot.com/2016/07/ed-schultz-populist-birthday-clown-for.html
I will come back of course.
I googled Ed over the weekend out of curiousity.
BUT THIS IS A GREAT LINK!
Thank you.
by Richard Day on Mon, 07/25/2016 - 2:00pm