MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
By Dan Duray, cover story for the New York Observer, February 7, 2011 issue
...In his November farewell post, after a five-year stint on the Atlantic blog, Marc Ambinder wrote that it will be a relief to head to the National Journal, where he will feel no compulsion to turn every piece into the opinion of "a web-based personality called 'Marc Ambinder' that people read because it's 'Marc Ambinder,' rather than because it's good or interesting."
"You're competitive in terms of getting something first, and then you're competitive on getting a take that is close to the truth so much as it can be approximated, and then you're competitive in building and keeping an influential and broad-based readership," Mr. Ambinder told The Observer, speaking with exhaustion of his time on the Web.
With the Jason Kottkes and Andrew Sullivans already established and still working, he added, it's become increasingly difficult to carve out a niche.
"We're at a stage now where that market is saturated, so it's the long tail phenomenon. We're getting to the point where it's really, really hard once you start, unless you're a phenomenon or something," he said.
This saturation of opinion dripped into the personal blogging sphere as well, with Tumblr, Facebook and Twitter becoming the preferred mode for oversharing....
Comments
Josh Marshall's opinion, from the article:
A reminder that the Yahoo Upshot news is a project of Andrew Golis, formerly of TPM.
by artappraiser on Fri, 02/04/2011 - 4:46pm
Let that be the reason I check it out which I have not done before...thanks for the headsup. I thought Golis was pretty cool.
by jollyroger on Fri, 02/04/2011 - 4:50pm
That's what I liked about TPM,
The bloggers themselves were the eyes and ears, the bloggers were getttng the scoops.
The bloggers were the Assanges.
by Resistance on Fri, 02/04/2011 - 5:11pm
I have no answers for you. I just posted this because I know that the Observer is the main trade rag of the media biz in NYC and have made it their business to be ahead of this kind of trend for quite a few years (or they themselves would be out of biz), and they put this on their print edition cover this week. Thought it might even be of interest to some of the proprietors of this site.
by artappraiser on Fri, 02/04/2011 - 5:12pm
Maybe to be ahead, means being in control?
Even good ideas needs a representative?
by Resistance on Fri, 02/04/2011 - 5:21pm
I should add to note the description of the site where destor just got a job as a columnist (which Genghis did a humorous post about.) Not to suggest that Murdoch is so savvy about these matters anymore, after all purchasing My Space was a big boo-boo....
by artappraiser on Fri, 02/04/2011 - 5:23pm
Thanks for this link, AA. I find the topic to be fascinating and the article itself to be muddled. How exactly does the author define classic blogging, and how does he define the contemporary replacements?
My perception is that Clive Thompson of Wired had it right. The classic blog post is a link followed by a few sentences of wry commentary. TPM exemplified this format and I think still does, though Josh has put a lot of resources into supplementing this format with original reporting.
I've never felt that TPM Cafe or dagblog, which inherits from the Cafe, was a traditional blog. We've always emphasized long-form opinion and commentary over aggregation--more FDL than Gawker.
While long-form op-ed may not have to compete with Twitter, the market is nonetheless saturated, and I'm wondering about the best way to go from here. We've got a decent audience and a very loyal community, but growth has plateaued since the election. There are some obvious search engine optimization steps that we intend to take, but I'm pondering about the other ways to raise our profile.
by Michael Wolraich on Fri, 02/04/2011 - 5:33pm
(more Kardashian pics)
by Donal on Fri, 02/04/2011 - 6:15pm
More or less in the same vein, TMcarthy has volunteered to acquire, and then flash, Marilyn Monroe's boobs...I'm thinkin'...calendar? And, of course, since we are not sexist here, and we have, by happy circumstance, strippers of both sexes in our ranks (ahem) we can go with 6 & 6. I just know Resistance will drop'em for the cause...Hell, Destor is half way there, by way of avatar...
by jollyroger on Fri, 02/04/2011 - 6:38pm
You're welcome; it's interesting to know that you're pondering on the issue. (Yeah, the article itself is lightweight. As a long time reader of the Observer, I am sensing an invisible editor behind this, as in an assignment that didn't exactly deliver, that they sense changes they want to report but can't find anyone to sum it well.)
Edit to add: it would be interesting to know if HuffPo is plateau-ing even as they try harder and harder to get more and more audiences. They certainly go with whatever is hot in the majority population as far as home page. But then in all the different sub-categories, they seem try to be all things to all people; i.e. Kardashian/National Enquirer/Hollywood and egghead foreign policy op-eds.
by artappraiser on Fri, 02/04/2011 - 7:30pm