MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
![]() |
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
I expected the the world's largest fireworks display is going off at Faux News Headquarters right now.
Comments
I wish that was really what she was saying, Juice. But no, she was saying we need more money to put U.S. propaganda out there, because we're in an information war with Al Jazeera and Al Jazeera is winning.
What she fails to grasp is that Al Jazeera is winning because it puts out competent unbiased reporting, especially on the Mideast to the Mideast, but even on the U.S. and other western countries. Emulate that, and you'll win viewers abroad. But if your only intent is to spread news tailored to support U.S. policies, yes, you're bound to fail. Because most U.S. foreign policy is bullshit, and people in the Mideast already understand that.
by acanuck on Thu, 03/03/2011 - 9:25pm
Of course she's promoting the US government propoganda machine. However, in the article she singles out our private media runs broadcasts with counter purposes to what we truly are as Americans. And wouldn't our private broadcast world also be a part of the mix the State Department uses as propaganda tools too?
HuffingtonPost has a better article in which she says...Al Jazeera is gaining more prominence in the U.S. because it offers "real news" -- something she said American media were falling far short of doing...that's meat on the bone.
In the same HuffPo article she twists the knife by contrasting Al Jazera with our esteemed news network by saying......
here's the url with video :
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/03/hillary-clinton-calls-al-_n_830...
by Beetlejuice on Fri, 03/04/2011 - 6:07am
Have you noticed that when popular discontent starts to boil over in any Middle Eastern country, it's Al Jazeera that gets booted out, not the Americans, Brits or other western reporters? Shows who is doing their job. Josh Marshall at TPM has also remarked on how Al Jazeera's Egypt coverage kicked the western networks' asses.
by acanuck on Fri, 03/04/2011 - 1:14pm
If they're singling out Al Jazeera that tells you their doing their job and digging deeper that just brushing off the surface dust. I suspect that's because being an Arab entity, they are more familiar with the environment and culture than the US, BBC or Europe and the last thing an Arab government needs is to loose face with the rest of the Arab world.
by Beetlejuice on Fri, 03/04/2011 - 2:40pm
That could also have a tiny bit to do with the fact that Al Jazeera is the main news source available in the Arabic language.
Part of the reason for Al Jazeera's importance in effecting change is that it brought western-style independent television network reporting to the Mideast masses, including the many functionally illiterate.
Previous to its existence, a ruler could say one thing in English to western reporters and another thing in Arabic to be disseminated to his people by state run television, and often did in many cases. One of the main reasons for the founding of the translation organization MEMRI was to highlight that kind of thing to the west, though they had their own axe to grind.
The original model is sort of BBC World in the original funding by Qatar government and its start up was helped by getting experienced staff from the shut down of BBC Arabic following Saudi censorship.
In its early days people were rightly skeptical whether it would just be another mouthpiece of another Arab ruler, playing this traditional distract 'em game.
Also I would note that its growth in the more recent years has included the hiring of lots of journalists with experience in the western MSM. Finally, there's an awful lot of non-Arab names on Al Jazeera English and as I doubt many of them are fluent in Arabic, I am always wondering how what's being said on Al Jazeera Arabic differs, whether they are translating all those pieces or they are just offered for the English speaking audience.
by artappraiser on Fri, 03/04/2011 - 3:09pm
I just posted a video segment on Egypt's future from Al Jazeera English's "Inside Story," appraiser. It's in flawless English, but everyone appearing (including the anchor) has an Arabic name. So it would be logical (and cost-effective) for the same cast to simply do an Arabic version as well. I have no evidence they actually do that, but it would make little sense not to.
by acanuck on Fri, 03/04/2011 - 5:36pm
They may be testing the limits of their overlords here:
From wikipedia on Al-Jazeera, see
And
As'ad at Angry Arab makes a sarcastic crack about this first here and then following up after finally seeing them report it here. As a far lefty, I've noticed he regularly bashes them on this front--here's another similar point made March 3--and has done so for a long time.
by artappraiser on Sat, 03/05/2011 - 9:44pm
After decades of carrying water for global capital and the impoverishment of the American working class, it would be poetically just if US news organizations themselves were actually forced to improve because of foreign competition, wouldn't it?
by brewmn on Fri, 03/04/2011 - 3:05pm