MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
This article has astounding sourcing!
Ms. Harris is the only 2020 Democrat who has fallen hard out of the top tier of candidates. She has proved to be an uneven campaigner who changes her message and tactics to little effect and has a staff torn into factions.
[....] In one instance after another, Ms. Harris and her closest advisers made flawed decisions about which states to focus on, issues to emphasize and opponents to target, all the while refusing to make difficult personnel choices to impose order on an unwieldy campaign, according to more than 50 current and former campaign staff members and allies, most of whom spoke on condition of anonymity to disclose private conversations and assessments involving the candidate [....]
Comments
Beginning excerpt and illustration:
1 page, 0.31 MB
by artappraiser on Fri, 11/29/2019 - 8:38am
Neither Kamala Harris or Cory Booker had much of a chance in 2020. The National mood seems to be that we need a white guy to face Trump. Elizabeth Warren's national numbers have dropped. Klobuchar never caught fire. Black voters seem to favor Biden, with Sanders and Buttigieg struggling to gain ground, especially in the first big test of the black vote in South Carolina. Harris and Booker might be considered possibilities for Vice President along with Warren and Klobuchar.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/heres-why-kamala-harris-and-cory-booker-cant-break-through-the-democratic-primary-field
Buttigieg is surging in Iowa and New Hampshire, with Sanders in second. Biden leads in Nevada and South Carolina, with Warren in second place.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/27/biden-buttigieg-lead-2020-democratic-primary-polls-in-iowa-nh-sc-and-nevada.htm
by rmrd0000 on Fri, 11/29/2019 - 10:11am
If anyone has a chance it was Booker. I always found him a less stiff, more natural Obama with a more convincing resume. Booker has "Executive" written all over him.But you gotta get your face and message out there. Obama had advantage of being 2nd in a 2-person race, much like Bernie last time. This time a contender needed sharp elbows to fight for air.
Kamala Harris? Too shallow background for this level of contest. I think she's been running a Mom and Pop show when she needed a professional SWAT team.
Warren is great with legislation and confronting Wall Street and financial regulations. I'm still not convinced she's a General Practitioner.
For all the charges of pandering and being insincere, Hillary's toolkit looked largely organic to me. Yeah, she had to appease the anti-TPP crowd, give in a bit on the fracking frenzy, but she was able to hold the madmen off on healthcare.
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 11/29/2019 - 11:02am
Peracles, At the risk of great wrath, I must say that Booker could never win against trump. He will never win over white working-class folks, and he also seems thin on specifics other than POC efforts. I had a very long drive the day that Barr's confirmation hearing took place, and Booker used all of his question times to get Barr to agree to start a Sub-Department on Race in the DOJ. He spent all his time opining on examples of smaller programs, and Barr happily put him off, saying he couldn't commit to anything like that at the time.
Each time he had a chance, he blew it repeating himself. There were plenty of things Barr needed to answer for, and Booker gave him a break from any confrontation at all. It made me mad at the time, and I may have been overly sensitized by that long sound-bite, but it seems that Booker's outlook is not inclusive, and he hasn't thought enough about the big picture, especially internationally.
I don't agree that it has to be a white guy, but the person who the country needs now happens to be one because he can bring in blue collar workers, blacks, and people who simply want a return to rationality. Biden will allow the international community to take a collective breath of relief. Who he chooses for VP is critical. I though Warren, but I'm not sure now. He would probably choose someone who is not running now, but who can hit the ground running, and take over if necessary. Stacy Abrams seems like a good fit.
by CVille Dem on Mon, 12/02/2019 - 10:04pm
Well, you've identified ways that Booker hasn't rounded that bend. He has a better story, but he hasn't used it, built to real substance. I remember being annoyed that Kamala Harris couldn't get that final tweak, clear finale to her cross-examination, and your Booker example's much worse. AOC's just a thrill to watch, Franken and Grayson used to be fun and cutting and effective. Gotta know why you're there. Abrams seems to, but she's starting from way down, and a failed state launch is hard to pitch as national quale (eh, Beto?)
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 12/03/2019 - 2:12am
Kamala Harris dropped out.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/03/us/politics/kamala-harris-campaign-drops-out.html
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 12/03/2019 - 2:18pm