Poor "Marijuana doesn't make you stupid" Johnson, he's not much of an advertisement for sustained marijuana use. If this is an example of what he's like when he "stopped using marijuana to be knife sharp" one can only wonder what he's like stoned.

It must drive folks crazy to try to please voters in a funk year. Here's the guy who's leading the anything-but-the-two-party-establishment disaffected vote (garnering 8% of the polls at this point):

When Johnson ran for president in 2012, he proposed a 43 percent, across-the-board, single-year federal spending cut, the worst idea proposed by any candidate running for president that year. Even the most ardent balanced-budget fetishists propose doing so over the course of five or 10 years. Johnson’s goal is to do it in one fiscal year, indiscriminately. The single-year spending cut he’s proposing in this year’s run isaround 20 percent, in line with lower annual deficit projections. A 20 percent single-year cut in federal spending would still be an absolute disaster—and yes, he would bring the budget into balance entirely through spending cuts, as he’s barred any tax increases. (Consider, too, what it would mean in the likely event of a recession to have a president who will refuse to enact anything but a balanced budget.) His tax reform plan, meanwhile, is much like Mike Huckabee’s beloved Fair Tax: replace the income tax and payroll taxes with a consumption tax. This would sharply reduce revenue and make the tax code more regressive— “simplify” it, as they like to say. Since we’re talking about young voters here, too, don’t ask Johnson for much help on college tuition. Same goes for your union drive.

Yes, the engineering guy who just pulled off Evil Knievel's Snake River Jump is less suicidal than the leading independent candidate for President. And unlike the Democratic nominee, he doesn't have to pretend to like the questionable free college for all idea - the list of petulant demands has a narrow focus - and if you're not in that rifle scope, planning to abolish the Department of Education does you no harm, along with the huge energy to abolish rich people's student loan debts - yay millennials! Yay disaffecteds!

And remember we were talking about which candidate had the best union support (hint: it wasn't Hillary, despite her endorsement by the leadership of almost every major unions - yep, the unhappy union supporters pivoted to the anti-union candidate. *THAT* will teach them a lesson. Whoever them is).

Is Hillary less trustworthy than the people she's trying to serve? Obviously not.