MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
![]() |
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
By Laura Saunders, Wall Street Journal, March 6, 2013
We're still coming after you. That is the message from the U.S. government to Americans who evaded federal taxes by stashing money in secret offshore accounts, say lawyers who represent some of those people.
After getting a guilty plea from Switzerland's oldest private bank, which was ordered Monday to pay a total of $74 million for violating U.S. tax laws, federal investigators have fresh momentum thanks to leads gathered from interviews with confessed tax cheats.
So far, U.S. officials have clawed back $5.5 billion in unpaid taxes and penalties in the past four years. At least another $5 billion is likely to be collected from continuing cases involving accounts at banks in Switzerland, India, Israel, Hong Kong, Singapore and elsewhere, according to estimates from lawyers who are tracking the various probes. The number of confessions is expected to rise sharply from the current total of 38,000.
"The government has no intention of letting up in its relentless pursuit of wealthy Americans with secret accounts offshore, and soon it will have even more tools to work with" as a new law goes into effect, said Mark Matthews, a former chief of the Internal Revenue Service's criminal-investigations division [.....]
Comments
That is good to hear. The article was behind a pay wall.
by trkingmomoe on Thu, 03/07/2013 - 3:14am
I have invariably found, many times, that if one Googles the title of a Wall Street Journal article, the resulting link one gets on Google will take you past the paywall. That's how I got this one, I saw the article on their site after I read another, but the site wouldn't let me see it, but then I got the whole thing through Google.
I'm actually thankful you mentioned that you couldn't access it, as I always wondered whether the link would transfer to another user--apparently not (or maybe I just don't know how to capture the special access url before it changes.) In any case, if you really want to read the whole article (or any other WSJ article,) try doing what I did yourself.
I suspect the WSJ likes it this way, that they want to tempt the incoming readers from Google, hook them and then they think they would have to pay to see more articles.
by artappraiser on Thu, 03/07/2013 - 3:48am