MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Comments
So enormously depressing that I have to block it out of my mind. Especially as I had just been looking at the twitter feed from a supposed "Art Business Conference" that seems to be following the whole paradigm to a T. Brave or Cowardly New World? Blockchain with billionaires, our only hope?! Are there any normal humans left around here?
by artappraiser on Tue, 04/17/2018 - 1:50pm
Sure " The plan was to take all the money and run" because the money was there. But where does the money come from and why? I've watched over the years as some new tech start-up was announced and rapidly received millions of dollars of investment money without any indication of profitability. Why would anyone invest in that? There is just so much money in the hands of the rich mostly due to tax cuts that there just aren't enough sensible and relatively reliable investment opportunities. The rich have to do something with that money so they gamble on a tech start-up. It's a risky gamble but when you're rich enough losing a few million is pocket change and unlike the change you or I lose when we get a hole in our pocket the rich get a huge tax write off if the investment fails. And who knows, this tech start-up might be the next google or facebook and reap billions for the early investors. If you've got so much money to not care about a few million and there's the possibility, however small, of a big payoff why not toss some of your excess cash at one of these start-ups? So of course there will be hucksters with their hand out on the receiving end.
The solution to the problem is
raising taxesrepealing the massive tax cuts republicans have been giving the rich for decades.by ocean-kat on Tue, 04/17/2018 - 2:49pm
I had to read this rant a few times to realize that you weren't joking and really had these retarded ideas...[No no no, we're not going to do this, Peter. I said up your game, not dumb down your game. If you can't manage to engage without insulting, everything will be deleted. PP]
by Peter (not verified) on Wed, 04/18/2018 - 2:23pm
Of course, investment losses are deductible against income.
Net worth is not taxed in the US as in Switzerland, Norway Holland, France. Wages are taxed more than investment profits here, plus wages/employers pay various wage related payroll taxes.
The net worth in the US of the home comprises most of middle-class wealth. It is taxed at often high rates as real estate tax, and is in effect a net worth tax on the middle-class.
Other stuff oligarchs do with their $$$, Jean LeCarre, 9/2017:
by NCD on Wed, 04/18/2018 - 4:23pm
Would add, with the Republican elimination of the estate (death) tax, capital gains can be multiplied generation after generation and never be taxed. A stock that doubled but was never sold can be passed on with no tax on that capital gain. If the person inheriting the stock sells it, the basis is the value when inhetited, not that when bought.
by NCD on Wed, 04/18/2018 - 5:15pm
by Peter (not verified) on Wed, 04/18/2018 - 11:08pm
Wrong, you're in the bubble.
Basis on inherited shares is stepped up for estate beneficiaries, meaning no tax would be collected on previous years or decades of share appreciation and capital gains:
With large estates, the "death tax" prevents the avoidance of any tax at all on capital gains when shares are passed to beneficiaries without sale.
by NCD on Thu, 04/19/2018 - 12:23am
90% of America's 2 million family farms have $350K in gross income or less. Only 0.18% are over $5 million in income (which at that point are hardly "family"), so we're still making a fuss over maybe 4000 family farms that might pay taxes, of which only a hundred or so might have some inheritance issue each year (i.e. the owner died without spouse living). Alright, lets look at another 1.77% of farms that have a median net income of about $475K, and with a 12x EV to EBITDA multiple, that's about $10 million - which is still below the $10.9 million estate exemption for married couples. So about 35,000 farms fall into this category, & perhaps 1000 have to think about this issue each year, and maybe a hundred or two have a problem with it.
Are you one of the elites, Peter? I mean, millions of people facing trying times, and you're obsessing over a few hundred? What gives?
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 04/19/2018 - 3:04am
by Peter (not verified) on Thu, 04/19/2018 - 10:27am
Sounds like you believe in some capitalistic version of collectivisation as the cure-all, except with a Focus on the Family twist. Perhaps we can *subsidize* them to make your concept even more ironic. (did you actually compare the total output of family farms vs non-family farms, or you just made a wild-assed guess that these traditional values units would be somehow übereffective, maybe through successful inbreeding of the worker of tomorrow?)
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 04/19/2018 - 10:49am
You're slipping into nonsense, again and independent family farms which are most farms will work towards a shared goal independent and free of your collective. One reason todays farms are so productive is they are highly mechanized, computerized and modernized. US corn farmers produce 5 times the yields they did a hunderd years ago on less land that many no longer plow. Some are predicting another 50% increase in yields is possible.[No, dude - 1) you used *NO* fucking reference in putting in a statistic, 2) yeah, like duh, farms with tractors produce more than with cows, 3) you're spouting pseudo-religious bullshit about family farms with no reference to anything - "family farms will work towards a shared goal independent of..." what the fuck? STOP IT. You've been spouting this stupid shit for ages. Enough. I'm sick of it. Talk sense, cite references, or go the fuck away.
Try again - I cited basic references - you can too. What's odd is you might even have a point - maybe- but you're lazy as shit and won't back up anything you say, and I'm sure as hell not going to do your work for you.
Oh, and by the way - 9 states have passed laws limiting corporate farming - Iowa, Minnesota, Kansas, Nebraska, Wisconsin, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, North Dakota.
The biggest farming states? California, Texas, Iowa, Minnesota, Kansas, Nebraska, Wisconsin, Illinois, North Carolina, Indiana. Notice some overlap? Could large-scale family farming not be as big a natural advantage as it is an artificially created preference?
PP]
by Peter (not verified) on Thu, 04/19/2018 - 12:12pm
Trump and the GOP are cutting food stamps, SNAP, which is bad for farmers and will starve Americans.
The GOP could care less about "feeding the 10 billion" and are gaming trade wars and tariffs which also is screwing American farmers.
We have a estate tax already, Trump and the Republicans want to end it to pay off the plutocrat$ who own the GOP, run the swamp, and to line their own pocket$$$$.
by NCD on Thu, 04/19/2018 - 12:28pm
Ah so now we're onto the Estate Tax, another republican scam to fool the 99% with bogus arguments that most will not research enough to understand. First we need to define "estate." In the popular imagination estate means "landed property, usually of considerable size." That's why talking about family farms is effective propaganda. But words usually have more than one definition. In this context estate means, "The whole of one's possessions, especially all the property and debts left by one at death."
The majority of estates that are large enough to require filing an estate tax return consist of unrealized capital gains that have never been taxed, not real estate.
What we're talking about here is about 5 thousand of the richest Americans 2/3 in the top 10% and 25% in the top 1%. Only about 80 "small farms" and business will pay any estate tax a year and it's usually not the value of the farm that cause them file an estate tax return. Most of these so called farmers are extremely wealthy land owners with estates that mostly consist of capital gains from investments that have never been taxed.
Republicans make an emotional appeal to repeal this tax by playing up the idea that some poor hard working farmer is losing his land but most of the so called farmers are so wealthy that they pay off the estate tax from other income sources and don't sell the land. The Tax Policy Center estimates that small farms and businesses will pay $30 million in estate tax in 2017, fifteen hundredths of 1 percent of the total estate tax revenue.
by ocean-kat on Thu, 04/19/2018 - 5:21pm