MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
![]() |
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
By Michael D. Schear, Eric Schmitt, Michael Crawley & Maggie Haberman @ NYTimes.com, June 20
WASHINGTON — President Trump approved military strikes against Iran in retaliation for downing an American surveillance drone, but pulled back from launching them on Thursday night after a day of escalating tensions.
As late as 7 p.m., military and diplomatic officials were expecting a strike, after intense discussions and debate at the White House among the president’s top national security officials and congressional leaders, according to multiple senior administration officials involved in or briefed on the deliberations.
Officials said the president had initially approved attacks on a handful of Iranian targets, like radar and missile batteries. The operation was underway in its early stages when it was called off, a senior administration official said. Planes were in the air and ships were in position, but no missiles had been fired when word came to stand down, the official said. [....]
It was not clear whether Mr. Trump simply changed his mind on the strikes or whether the administration altered course because of logistics or strategy. It was also not clear whether the attacks might still go forward.
Asked about the plans for a strike and the decision to hold back, the White House declined to comment, as did Pentagon officials. No government officials asked The New York Times to withhold the article.
The retaliation plan was intended as a response to the shooting down of the unmanned, $130 million surveillance drone, which was struck Thursday morning by an Iranian surface-to-air missile, according to a senior administration official who was briefed on the military planning and spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss confidential plans.
The strike was set to take place just before dawn Friday in Iran to minimize risk to the Iranian military and civilians.
But military officials received word a short time later that the strike was off, at least temporarily [....]
Mr. Trump’s national security advisers split about whether to respond militarily. Senior administration officials said Secretary of State Mike Pompeo; John R. Bolton, the national security adviser; and Gina Haspel, the C.I.A. director, had favored a military response. But top Pentagon officials cautioned that such an action could result in a spiraling escalation with risks for American forces in the region [....]
Comments
Seems like there's Trump's U.S.A. doing it's own narrative and then there's the rest of the world:
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 12:44am
I almost want to say "not The Onion", but it isThe Onion:
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 12:46am
Glenn Thrush sums up his colleagues' work:
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 12:48am
Same leakers spoke to WaPo: "Administration officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive national security decisions":
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 12:56am
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 12:57am
Trump's tweets Thurs. in chrono order:
9:58 am
10:14 am
10:15 am
1:49 pm
6:22 pm
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 1:13am
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 1:16am
AP breaking 1 hr. ago:
Same time Maggie Haberman tweets that they still don't know the reason it was called off:
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 1:20am
NYTimes: The Editorial Board: Attacking Iran Is Congress’s Call, 1h ago
The Trump administration’s campaign of maximum pressure and minimal diplomacy is bringing the two countries ever closer to blows. Lawmakers must weigh in.
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 2:53am
David Ignatius @ WaPo June 20 at 4:56 PM, obviously before the White House leak was published about the cancelled attack:
Iran must escape the American chokehold before it becomes fatal
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 3:06am
This story is bullshit. Anyone who has followed any story about military strikes in the past knows it's a lie. There is no way that with planes in the air minutes before bombing some general said, "By the way, 150 people will likely die in this attack." Either it's all a lie or Trump was to stupid to hear and remember it when he was told during the initial planning.
Even fox news Chris Wallace points out how unbelievable this lie is.
by ocean-kat on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 2:41pm
Trump’s account of planning, then canceling Iran strikes is facing scrutiny
Aides around President Trump and military analysts are questioning his description of events. And no new sanctions were imposed against Iran, in contradiction of Trump's tweets
just put up on Washington Post.
by NCD on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 7:52pm
I think some skepticism was indicated by the NYTimes putting this line in the article and that's why I underlined it:
No government officials asked The New York Times to withhold the article.
I took that as: this came from pro-Trump leakers, not our usual leakers. But that they also felt that in no way could they be sure about what the motive was in telling them and that it could be true. This is what is especially sad about this administration, no one can ever be sure what is being said and why.
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 9:48pm
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/21/2019 - 10:43pm
(Maggie Haberman retweeted)
by artappraiser on Sat, 06/22/2019 - 11:40am
Iran summons Emirates’ top envoy over US drone incident
By A.P. @ NPR.org, Jun 22, 2019 12:27 PM EDT
by artappraiser on Sat, 06/22/2019 - 5:50pm
Iranian Force Exults in Downing of U.S. Drone With a Feast and a Prayer
By Farnaz Fassihi & David D. Kirkpatrick @ NYTimes.com, June 22
air force, in Tehran on Thursday, inspecting debris purported
to be fragments of the downed American drone.Credit:
Meghdad Madadi/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
by artappraiser on Sat, 06/22/2019 - 6:00pm
by artappraiser on Sat, 06/22/2019 - 6:02pm