By Alexander Abad-Santos, The Atlantic Wire, Feb. 17, 2012
After reading David Brooks' "The Jeremy Lin Problem" this morning, it seemed as though our Twitter feed instantly sparkled with little nuggets of dissent —so many in fact that we put together this guide to David Brooks haters. As a New York Times Op-Ed columnist, Brooks did his job: find a newsworthy topic, wax poetic, and connect it to a larger general picture. The problem, as the Twitterverse will point out, is that Brooks wrote about Lin being an anomaly for being a religious athlete (which if you've ever seen athletes dunk, score and rain down three-pointers you'll know that Jesus is totally a sports fan) and then wrote ... you know what, we'll let his haters explain [....]
A good reminder of the options available and not taken. Bush pioneered the no-stimulus recovery in 2001, to bad (but Republican) result. Obama largely played along to GOP TARP plans in 2009, including lowball public assistence and austerity. Hillary's wrapping herself around Obama as she must, but we know she's not a kumbaya idealist. Will she learn the real lessons behind the rhetoric - both in economic and foreign policy? How will/would she govern during the next crisis? I think it's a given she's not out to be either Bill or Barry's 3rd term. Will she find her own 3rd Way? Will she pull out her Saul Alinsky? Will she stay content with the 1 big idea per year mode? Or will she open up multiple fronts like FDR? We'll likely see come January.
Thought I'd file this under the endless litany of who wears the MLK mantle, what would Jesus do and if FDR came back, would he drive a hybrid?
Of course MLK wouldn't be a woman, but he might friend one. Curiously he could be white. But possibly gay.
Would he have a biting sense of humor, or still rely on preacher's prose and metaphor?
Almost left out LBJ - would he eat a lo-carb diet and carpool? Post pictures of abused dogs to Facebook or Pinterest? Things do change as they stau the same. Perhaps Vietnam by drone wouldn't look the same.