MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
![]() |
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
The plot thickens for Kathy Nickolaus, the Waukesha, Wisconsin county clerk who used her own home-brewed voting software to miraculously discover 14,000 votes for her former boss, Tea Party-favored Supreme Court Justice David Prosser. Yes, former boss -- Nickolaus worked under Prosser at the disgraced Assembly Republican Caucus, who were exposed while illegally conducting secret campaigns for Republican legislative candidates. What's more, Nickolaus is something of an old hand when it comes to voting irregularities:
In 2006, Nickolaus, who was elected Waukesha County clerk in 2002, was criticized for posting election returns that temporarily skewed results of a Republican primary for the 97th Assembly District. At the time, Nickolaus told reporters some returns from the city of Waukesha were entered in the wrong column.And last summer, the Waukesha County Board ordered an internal audit of her office, citing concerns Nickolaus was secretive and refusing to cooperate with the county's technical staff in a security review of the computerized election system.
Some officials also were critical of Nickolaus' decision to stop posting municipal results to save time. Auditors who looked at the Waukesha County system found 26 of 62 counties surveyed also did not post local results -- a step that might have revealed the missing Brookfield numbers.
Comments
As Gomer Pyle would say ...Surprise ! Surprise...
by cmaukonen on Mon, 04/11/2011 - 8:25pm
Holding an elected position, as she does, protects her...she can't be fired. It makes one think...the only way she is able to float thru these anomalies may be based on the GOPer's having control over the State Legislature and Judiciary. So if she is caught manipulating the counts, whatever she says was the root cause of the miscount will be accepted and the matter forgotten. In other words, she has a get-out-of-jail card so she needn't worry about the State taking any actions against her.
Also, note too, if any other county in any other State had issues with their vote tabulating software, the software manufacturer would be raked over the coals to explain in technical details what occurred and why, why the elaborate data validation techniques embedded didn't catch the problem, and what they were going to do about it without transferring the cost back to the end-user. However, in the case of Nickolaus, her home-brewed application is immune from analysis and her position is independent from the State function that oversees the voting process to ensure anomalies, such as the one that just occurred, do not happen in real time. Odd too, the State doesn't require all counties to have the same, uniform vote tabulating software to ensure state-wide voter accuracy so anomolies, such as the many that has happened during Nickolaus tenure, do not occur with such regularity.
This is why so many people distrust electronic voting without paper trails to authenticate the number of votes for candidates. Too easy for someone with strong ideological concerns to manipulate the results in favor of their Party.
Additional Update:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/11/tammy-baldwin-eric-holder-wisco...
Still Another :
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/04/wis-officials-still-examining...
by Beetlejuice on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 6:21am
The good news, as I understand it, is that this time around there is a paper trail. There are actual paper ballots that can be counted. Although I am also suspicious of her, I am reminded of Hanlon's razor: never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. In this case perhaps you can replace stupidity by incompetence, or some combination of the two. Oh, and of course at least a soupçon of malice. Put another way, as difficult as it may be, I'm going to (mostly) assume for now that she's innocent of malice until proven guilty. As for incompetence, that boat has already sailed.
by Verified Atheist on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 8:28am