Donal: Is Occupy Over?
Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR)
dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude
Book of the Month
From the Readers
- PeraclesPlease 18 hours ago
- PeraclesPlease 1 day ago
- PeraclesPlease 2 days ago
- ironboltbruce 2 days ago
- Orion 3 days ago
- bslev 4 days ago
- Another Trope 4 days ago
- NCD 6 days ago
- bslev 1 week ago
- cmaukonen 1 week ago
Creative corner
- MrSmith1 2 days ago
- MrSmith1 1 week ago
- tmccarthy0 1 week ago
- MrSmith1 2 weeks ago
- Donal 2 weeks ago
From the Dagbloggers
- Donal 12 hours 59 min ago
- Donal 2 days 20 hours ago
- William K. Wolfrum 3 days 1 hour ago
- Ramona 3 days 2 hours ago
- Doctor Cleveland 3 days 11 hours ago
- Genghis 4 days 21 hours ago
- destor23 4 days 23 hours ago
- Donal 5 days 20 hours ago
- Donal 6 days 19 hours ago
- Donal 1 week 2 days ago
History
- Member for
- 1 year 16 weeks
Blog Posts
- Trying to bribe a police officer would be the same as trying to talk him/her out of a ticket.
- Taxation would be taking away our speech.
- A bonus from your employer would be the same as them giving you a good talking to.
- Prostitution would be the same as talking someone into sleeping with you.
- Convincing someone to vote for a particular candidate would be the same as buying their vote.
- 6 comments
- 197 reads
-
- 3 comments
- 153 reads
- 2 comments
- 145 reads
-
- 5 comments
- 92 reads
-
- 27 comments
- 396 reads
-
- 20 comments
- 373 reads
-
- 12 comments
- 371 reads
-
- Add new comment
- 68 reads
-
- 8 comments
- 651 reads
If money were speech
by Verified Atheist 2/6/2012 - 12:05 pm
I was thinking some about the equivalence that has been made in the Supreme Court between money and speech. What if money actually were speech? What would that mean?
Please, contribute your own!
Tom Udall for Vice President?
by Verified Atheist 12/28/2011 - 10:18 am
OK, to start with, this is meant partly tongue-in-cheek. But… only partly.
As you may recall, in 2008 there was some name calling within the Democratic party as to whether you were a racist (if you were a Clinton supporter) or you were a sexist (if you were an Obama supporter). Obviously, I'm hand-waving quite egregiously, but I trust that everyone remembers what I'm referring to, even if I am being a bit glib about it. [Read more]
Desperation Recipes
by Verified Atheist 12/16/2011 - 2:59 pm
Sometimes, good, novel recipes are borne out of desperation. I had that happen to me recently when I found myself with only one egg and needed to make a two egg omelet. In lieu of the other egg, I substituted Greek yogurt (which I had on hand).
The recipe is as follows: [Read more]
2011 Elections, part deux
by Verified Atheist 11/7/2011 - 10:08 am
I don't really have much to add to my previous post on the 2011 elections TOMORROW, but since it is TOMORROW, I wanted to throw this back up on the front burner to help remind people that they need to vote TOMORROW.
My question for today is, will you vote tomorrow, and if not, why not?
I'm attempting to add this as a poll:
2011 Elections
by Verified Atheist 11/3/2011 - 8:54 am
Next Tuesday is the second Tuesday in November, and so for many of us (most of us?) this means that there are local and/or state elections to think about. These are the types of elections that those supporting the various Occupy movements should approve of: typically little money is invested in campaigning and politicians who are frequently known by their supporters or at least only one or two degrees separated. Furthermore, those people who get elected to national offices (which is what the media usually focuses on, and unfortunately what many of us, including me, focus on) usually occupied state offices previously, and those people who get elected to state offices usually occupied local offices previously. [Read more]
Outrage and Inner Peace
by Verified Atheist 10/16/2011 - 4:17 pm
A friend of mine once said to me:
There's a fine line between contentment and complacency.
Now, my friend's point was meant as an argument against being complacent, but I happen to think it cuts both ways. It's been decades since I was a teenager, and over that time I've worked more and more on establishing inner peace, and as a result I am a more peaceful man.
Am I too peaceful? Maybe so.
Don't take this small piece as a lecture to be more peaceful, but rather as a question (or set of questions) from someone who understands the value of well-placed outrage.
Can inner peace and outrage co-exist? [Read more]
Space hotels
by Verified Atheist 10/1/2011 - 12:31 pm
As some of you know, I love science, and I care about the environment. Sometimes, these two interests are in conflict, as in the case of space hotels. Alas, my romantic side wants the space hotels to win, and any time my environmental, logical side speaks up about how much fuel will be required for such ventures, my romantic side punches him in the face and steals his lunch money. [Read more]
Parties and salamanders
by Verified Atheist 9/21/2011 - 2:02 pm
I've recently stumbled onto the YouTube site of an unsung genius. He also has a web-site with much of the same content, only with text added.
There's a lot of great content there, but to get you started, I want to highlight these three bits:
"Nearly half of Americans don't pay taxes?" - Why that should make us mad!
by Verified Atheist 7/30/2011 - 3:48 pm
No doubt many of us have heard by now that nearly half of all Americans pay no taxes. Now, of course, an easy response to that is to correct that statement by pointing out that all Americans pay taxes, but that still leaves the statement that nearly half of all Americans pay no federal income taxes as being true.
It is true, and it should make us madder than it makes the conservatives. [Read more]
In the News
-
WTF, Quebec?
Quebec student protesters find creative ways around controversial new law
Read the article at http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/1181357--quebec-student-protesters-find-creative-ways-around-controversial-new-law- Add new comment
-
Obamneybush Plans for Afghanistan
Perceptive Dagblog readers know the difference between Obama, Romney and Bush:
Obama NYT today: .how President Obama’s thinking about what he once called “a war of necessity” began to radically change less than a year after he took up residency in the White House....The aide told Mr. Obama that he believed military leaders had agreed to the tight schedule to begin withdrawing those troops just 18 months later only because they thought they could persuade an inexperienced president to grant more time if they demanded it. “Well,” Mr. Obama responded that day, “I’m not going to give them more time.”...Mr. Obama concluded in his first year that the Bush-era dream of remaking Afghanistan was a fantasy...
Mitt Romney, Feb. 2012 : LAS VEGAS -- LAS VEGAS -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Wednesday night blasted President Obama and his administration for “putting in jeopardy” the nation’s military mission by signaling it hopes to end its combat mission in Afghanistan by the middle of 2013.
Appearing at a campaign rally here shortly after landing in Nevada, Romney said Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta’s statement Wednesday that U.S. forces would transition from a combat mission in Afghanistan next year “makes absolutely no sense.”....George W. Bush, from May, 2003: BBC - "We do not know the day of final victory, but we have seen the turning of the tide... Free nations will press on to victory,"
Bush Afghanistan strategy : Gen. Douglas E. Lute, who had spent the last two years of the Bush administration trying to manage the many trade-offs necessary as the Iraq war consumed troop and intelligence resources needed in Afghanistan, arrived with a PowerPoint presentation. The first slide that General Lute threw onto the screen caught the eye of Thomas E. Donilon, later President Obama’s national security adviser. “It said we do not have a strategy in Afghanistan that you can articulate or achieve,” Mr. Donilon recalled three years later. “We had been at war for eight years, and no one could explain the strategy.”
-
Marco Rubio as VP: Bilderberg conspiracy
Mitt Romney isn’t very far into the vice presidential selection process. But according to a dedicated band of conspiracy theorists, the pick is all but a lock: Sen. Marco Rubio.
That’s the current thinking among a worldwide collection of activists who are obsessed with the secretive Bilderberg Group, an alternating roster of global power players who loom as large — if not larger — in the online fever swamps of the fringe as the Trilateral Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76518.html#ixzz1vN5egowzRead the article at http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76518.html -
Why science needs wonder
Aristotle and Plato didn’t agree on much, but they were united in identifying wonder as the origin of their profession. As Aristotle said, “It is owing to their wonder that men . . . first began to philosophise.” This idea appeals to scientists, who frequently enlist wonder as a goad to inquiry. “I think everyone in every culture has felt a sense of awe and wonder looking at the sky,” wrote Carl Sagan in 1985, locating in this response the stirrings of a Copernican desire to know who and where we are.
Yet that is not the only direction in which wonder may take us. To Thomas Carlyle, wonder sits at the beginning not of science, but of religion. That is the central tension in forging an alliance of wonder with science: will it make us curious, or induce us to prostrate ourselves in pitiful ignorance? We had better get to grips with this question before we too hastily appropriate wonder to sell science. That is surely what is going on when pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope are (unconsciously?) cropped and coloured to recall the sublime iconography of Romantic landscape painting, or the Human Genome Project is wrapped in biblical rhetoric, or the Large Hadron Collider’s proton-smashing is depicted as “replaying the moment of creation”. The point is not that such things are deceitful or improper, but that if we want to take that path, we should first consider the complex evolution of the relation between science and wonder.
[....]
Pretending that science is performed by people who have undergone a Baconian purification of the emotions only deepens the danger that it will seem alien and odd to outsiders, something carried out by people who do not think as they do. Daston believes that we have inherited a “view of intelligence as neatly detached from emotional, moral and aesthetic impulses, and a related and coeval view of scientific objectivity that brand[s] such impulses as contaminants”. It is easy to understand the historical origins of this attitude: the need to distinguish science from credulous “enthusiasm”, to develop an authoritative voice, to strip away the pretensions of the mystical Renaissance magus who acquired knowledge through personal revelation. We no longer need these defences, however; worse, they become a defensive reflex that exposes scientists to the caricature of the emotionally constipated boffin, hiding within thickets of jargon.
Read the article at http://www.newstatesman.com/sci-tech/sci-tech/2012/05/why-science-needs-wonder -
Craig Venter Wants to Solve the World’s Energy Crisis
... We’re trying to harness photosynthesis. A key part of photosynthesis is what happens when the sun goes down. Cells convert CO2 into sugar and fat molecules. And they store the fat to burn as energy to get them through the night ... We’re trying to coax our synthetic cells to ... store far more fat than they actually were designed to do, so that we can harness it all as an energy source and use it to create gasoline, diesel fuel, and jet fuel straight from carbon dioxide and sunlight. This would shift the carbon equation so we’re recycling CO2 instead of taking new carbon out of the ground and creating still more CO2. But it has to be done on a massive scale to have any real impact on the amount of CO2 we’re putting into the atmosphere, let alone recovering from the atmosphere.
... We envision facilities the size of San Francisco. And 10 or 15 of those in this country. We need sunlight, seawater, and non-agricultural land, but you need a lot of photons to drive this. You need a lot of surface area of sunlight to do that. It’s a great use for Arizona. Lots of sunlight there.
... If we can’t get some key scientific breakthroughs within the next couple of years, it probably won’t happen in 10 years. So it’s something that’s really dependent on fundamental science. But we’re already able to do things that were once seen as impossible.
... I think the new anti-intellectualism that’s showing up in politics today is a symptom of our not discussing these issues enough. We don’t discuss how our society is now 100 percent dependent on science for its future. We need new scientific breakthroughs—sometimes to overcome the scientific breakthroughs of the past. A hundred years ago oil sounded like a great discovery. You could burn it and run engines off it. I don’t think anybody anticipated that it would actually change the atmosphere of our planet. Because of that we have to come up with new approaches. We just passed the 7 billion population mark. In 12 years, we’re going to reach 8 billion. If we let things run their natural course, we’ll have massive pandemics, people starving. Without science I don’t see much hope for humanity.Read the article at http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/05/mf_venter/2/
Latest Comments
-
in Fair Weather Dems will be...Aunt Sam
-
in Fair Weather Dems will be...Aunt Sam
-
in When Corporations...NCD
-
in Is the Occupy Movement...Donal
-
in Fair Weather Dems will be...Resistance
-
in Fair Weather Dems will be...Resistance
-
in Counting Saverin's...Donal
-
in Fair Weather Dems will be...Ramona
-
in Why science needs wonder...Verified Atheist
-
in Is the Occupy Movement...Another Trope
-
in Torture is not Missing...Verified Atheist
-
in Torture is not Missing...Verified Atheist
-
in Torture is not Missing...Another Trope
-
in Torture is not Missing...Donal
-
in When Corporations...Verified Atheist