"It's an implied moral argument, one that you've made often here in which you claim the moral high ground, and one that I find profoundly immoral. Virtually everyone no matter what degree of evil they embrace or manifest is nice to some people."

This exactly expresses what Italian historian Sergio Luzzatto called "the banality of decency", which I've mentioned before.

Luzzatto says this tactic was used in the postwar trials of fascists. Recall when Italy withdrew from the war in July, 1943, it brought German occupation and the Gestapo to Italy in September 1943 until the surrender of German troops in Italy in May 1945.

Luzzatto reviewed trials of some of the most heinous Italian collaborators and accomplices to murder who aided the Gestapo, Luzzatto noted their defense lawyers often found people who (for little or no discernible reason) were "pulled out" of Gestapo "snowbanks".

They were very few compared to the scores or thousands who perished. But the dead don't speak. This testimony was often enough to overturn death sentences on appeal to courts outside the region where the crimes had been committed.

Er, from Wikipedia: Jared Kushner, just sayin'

Political background

Jared Kushner had been a lifelong Democrat prior to Donald Trump entering politics.[46] He had donated over $10,000 to Democratic campaigns[47] starting at young age of 11. In 2008 he donated to the campaign for Hillary Clinton and his newspaper the New York Observer endorsed Barack Obama over John McCainin the US presidential election.[48] but after disappointment with Barack Obama he endorsed Republican US presidential race nominee Mitt Romney in 2012 via the New York Observer.[49] In 2014 he continued to donate to Democratic groups,[48] but he then continued his "ideological conversion" by joining his father-in-law Donald Trump's nascent US presidential campaign in 2015.[54] Kushner had no prior involvement in campaign politics or in government before Trump's campaign.[55]

Edit to add. Furthermore, even in the White House and despite all his crooked real estate bullshit, he's still not the same as his father-in-law:

FIRST STEP Act

Kushner helped to spearhead creation of the Formerly Incarcerated Reenter Society Transformed Safely Transitioning Every Person Act (FIRST STEP ACT, H.R. 5682) and its May 9, 2018 endorsement by the House Judiciary Committee.[105][106][107]

I think it's important to remind ourselves that Hillary didn't call all Trump supporters or voters "deplorables."

“You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” Clinton said. “The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up.”

She said the other half of Trump’s supporters “feel that the government has let them down” and are “desperate for change.”

 I agree with that view though it's likely that even calling half of Trump supporter's deplorables probably wasn't good politics.

I really missed the importance of the high disapproval ratings of Hillary. For me most of the dislike of Hillary was based on right wing talking points that I thought were completely debunked or not very important. So I didn't get that for so many, even some democratic voters, they were relevant. It does make me cautiously optimistic of 2020. Trump hate doesn't seem to have diminished and no one the democrats can nominate has been so  successfully demonized as Hillary was so all else being equal the democratic presidential nominee should win easily without there being anything equivalent to Hillary hate.

The history of 1941 through early 50s is far more dynamic and complex than your photo.

The Germans were off our shores with U boats and allied with Japan. Russia was no threat, had no Navy, and Russia suffered 27 million dead bleeding the Germans dry, saving Britain and western Europe. Many throughout the West believed Stalin's pro-worker propaganda, even into the early 50s.

In 1943 there was no reliable prognostication of the post-war world, conflicts, new weapons that might threaten the US, or the effectiveness of alliances and the new UN. 

the point is succinctly made right here, Nov. 5 @ WaPo, and I trust Eugene Scott ("Reporter covering identity politics for The Fix") more than rmrd on the internet:

 Despite making multiple offensive comments, repeatedly attacking the popular Obama, and his own history of racial profiling and discrimination, Trump won a higher percentage of black voters than the 2012 Republican presidential nominee.

There were plenty of people who only got the true gist of his attitude towards race slowly after he was elected.

I'd like to share that personally, I find your jihad type identity purity approach to partisan politics to be such a turn off that if you recommend or support a candidate, I find it really hard not to be prejudiced against that candidate. It is such a turn off that it is hard to switch off the emotions and judge the candidate rationally. I do, but it's hard after I see rmrd supports the person. I would never ever hire you as a political consultant, that's for sure. You are a worse purist than most Bernie types. Any tiny hint of any thought that might construed as racist somehow, you only don't want their vote, you want them to pay for it in hell for eternity. I think your rhetoric often tends racialist if not full out racist. I'd really prefer Dems that don't act that way. I think it's bad for the country, feeds the troll, and stokes the divisiveness and tribalism.

And here's Sen. Corey Booker in the new interview @ The Atlantic; it's clear you're not going to get much help from him with your program:

The other thing I want to say is, millions and millions of good Americans, good decent Americans, voted for Donald Trump. As [Abraham] Lincoln said, “The best way to destroy my enemy is to make him my friend.” If you make Trump the subject, then you’re not talking about the shared pain in this country, the shared injustice in this country. The fact is, Donald Trump voters aren’t getting paid a living wage; they’re losing their dignity in their work. There’s common pain in this country, but we’ve lost a sense of common purpose. If you make Donald Trump your central focus, then it’s going to be much harder to get to a sense of common purpose.

Foer: Do you believe love can conquer racism?

Booker: I don’t think the word conquer is right, but I do believe that it can break down all these artificial constraints. I just really do believe that at the end of the day, this country respects and honors people based on their character and the quality of their ideas. I just see so many people who are talking to hearts and heads and not tribalism, and that kind of thing breaking through.

Foer: King talked about how self-righteousness is an enemy of love? It seems like we kind of do live in a world plagued by …

Booker: A world plagued by self-righteousness, by righteous indignation. I think about the profound humility that people had in the face of the likes of Bull Connor. In Birmingham, the first time jails were completely full in the modern civil-rights movement, they were filled with kids. As the kids are on the bus going home, you know what they’re singing? “What do we want? Freedom. When do we want it? Now.” Then they start saying, “What does the governor want? Freedom. When does he want it? Now.” They were literally singing songs not of attack toward the people that were oppressing them and literally shipping them off to jail; they were singing songs about the idea that my liberation and your liberation are interwoven. As King says, “Dignity is indivisible.” I can assault the tactics you’re using, the walls that you’re perpetuating. But as I start attacking your human dignity, I’m diminishing my own.