MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
There it is. Melt your dog-whistles into swords.
Comments
Bigoted comments like that make me think the United States would be best as some sort of divided group of states. Imagine if France or the United Kingdom had to deal with a president whose statements were meant as red meat back in Chechnya, Slovenia or Ukraine.
by Orion on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 5:07am
The thing about the United States is that we are all descended from invaders except for the First Nation who walked over a land bridge long ago. And they had their own fights with each other before the Europeans showed up. The myth of the Original People that anchors so many forms of Nationalism is dumb as a stick here. It is specifically refuted by the documents that set up the polity we have established.
So we have created a system of privilege that does not acknowledge itself as such. The stupid part of that lack of awareness makes the regions you propose impossible.
There is nothing there.
by moat on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 9:29pm
Neo-con never trumper not with the program:
by artappraiser on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 7:25am
CNN "New Day" show:
by artappraiser on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 7:28am
Joe Scarborough:
by artappraiser on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 7:30am
on what Joe said this morning in this case he wants to further divide the Democratic Party, I suspect he may have come to that conclusion partly from knowing scuttlebutt from Dem politico sources:
Being a former GOP rep from Florida, and from a district that was formerly Dem, he has always understood the necessity for "moderation" of various kinds. But he may or may not get what's up with this with the millennial generation...
by artappraiser on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 8:43pm
The Evil Genius of Trump’s Bigotry
By Jonathan V. Last @ TheBulwark.com, July 15
by artappraiser on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 10:54pm
Mr. Last is a hard core Weekly Standard, now Bulwark, "conservative." Most are just vacuous media shills.
Why don't the never-Trumpers defend the Michigan Republican who just quit the Party, or back Governor Weld in his run to oppose Trump's nomination?
Pelosi is certainly not going to look to them for advice, and Last's 3d chess attributed to Trump is bs, the simple explanation is Trump hates powerful women and brown ones in particular, and he's playing up the racism and will keep it up until 11/20.
by NCD on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 11:21pm
The more outrageous Trump's comments, the bigger the story he's trying to cover up.
His deputy just toured a concentration camp full of victims - it didn't go well. Thus an attack on The Squad.
Are we so stupid that this technique keeps working after 3-4 years? Covering up criminal behavior with boorish behavior?
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 9:41am
Boorish is hardly the word, MW: boorish implies rudeness of manner due to insensitiveness to others' feelings and unwillingness to be agreeable. (ex - Archie Bunker)
Trump's comments are incendiary racist attacks, they are a disgrace to our country and the office he holds.
comment at wapo:
Republicans:
This is not a hard call for you to make.
If you can't standup against this blatant racism, then you are too gutless to stand up any injustice.
by NCD on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 10:27am
Try: boorish, churlish, loutish, clownish mean uncouth in manners or appearance. boorish implies rudeness of manner due to insensitiveness to others' feelings and unwillingness to be agreeable. a drunk's boorish behavior churlish suggests surliness, unresponsiveness, and ungraciousness. churlish remarks loutish implies bodily awkwardness together with stupidity. a loutish oaf clownish suggests ill-bred awkwardness, ignorance or stupidity, ungainliness, and often a propensity for absurd antics. an adolescent's clownish conduct
Churlish & surly, loutish, rudeness of manner - all seem accurate to me.
You're welcome to your own descriptions, and surely I've used stronger at other times, but at the same time, it's standard "he wants to piss them off so he'll say X" - it's either "bleeding from wherever" or "Pocahantas" or "Lyin Ted" or Trump's birther comments about Obama... I don't get why people are having a field day with someone who regularly says racist, sexist, genocidal, xenophobic things, that suddenly we should note "hey, this one's really racist, let's call it Trump's Racism 2.0" or something - he's an asshat and he uses asshat comments to get his way.
AND WE FUCKING FORGOT ABOUT THE IMMIGRANTS IN CAGES AT THE BORDER NOW. We're off debating Trump's lack of politeness and looking shit up in the dictionary - he wins every goddamn time.
What were all the shitty things Trump called and said about the San Juan mayor & all of Puerto Rico after he idly sat back and did nothing while 3000 people died without electricity and emergency supplies? It doesn't matter now, all water and lives under the bridge - we're on to our next outrage. which shithole country & its citizens did he insult next?
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 10:58am
My old nostrum was always just say no to culture wars. From back before the country and it's media spent months/years 24/7 talking about Bill Clinton trying to hook up with Paula Jones and a subsequent White House blow job instead of getting other things done.But it's hard when there's someone playing them with this much skill level, the only real skill he has. He can do it on dime, no lengthy and expensive plots needed for him. Producing outrage for attention is what he knows how to do. Part of me actually sympathizes with GOP office holders who just ignore him and it. Because that's how they are getting stuff done that they want to get done.
by artappraiser on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 2:04pm
The GOP is "getting stuff done that they want to get done" because they believe they can keep "winning" with culture wars and white identity politics, now, led by Trump, more blatant and repugnant than ever, but delicious red meat for their Electoral College empowered rural swing state base.
We'll see if how well that works out in 11/2020.
by NCD on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 5:01pm
If they hack all the voting machines or decimate the Democratic count (using the term proper historically, deleting 1 of every 10), it will work out pretty well for them. And since we usually disallow vote recounts or audits, that'll be it.
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 5:04pm
..and if necessary -14th amendment says VOTE COUNTING must STOP when the Republican is ahead...! Constitutional right!!
SCOTUS overrules Florida State Supreme Court, 12/2000 making GWB President... signs the death certificates of 5000 US troops in the GOP's awesome adventure in the Middle East, and a million or more Iraqi's.
by NCD on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 6:08pm
There's a clear difference between those who ignore the really bad stuff. and just don't speak about it, and the allout dittoheads, as cynical as the dittoheading might be:
by artappraiser on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 9:04pm
I see how "culture war" refers to various sorts of political discourse. But I have always understood it as a struggle to advance ways of behaving in the situations we all have to live within.
So, at work for instance, there are various practices that all the other workers have different views about what is best for themselves and others and they make decisions for themselves and others on that basis. Which collection of influences is more prevalent than others has a direct effect upon what does or does not happen.
In education, the policies of whatever community locally determines the opportunities of one's kinder also collides with whatever is happening in the parents' heads about they should do about the new being.
From a results based perspective of what actually causes people to be more like one set of things and less like another, there is little that escapes struggle and consternation.
by moat on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 9:05pm
Republican's culture war means they set the rules on how you behave, and have the remedies if you don't.
They are endowed by "the American people", their God and the Constitution with the right to behave and believe, anyway and anything they want to.
by NCD on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 10:46pm
Example, GOP culture war, real time, today, AG Barr:
"My concern today is that under the banner of identity politics some political factions are seeking to obtain power by dividing Americans and they undermine the values that draw us together, such as a shared commitment to our country's success. This is the breeding ground for hatred and we must reject it," Barr said.
As per my point, those "seeking power", ie Democrats, are "undermining values" and our "shared commitment to our country's success. ..breeding hatred", meaning anything Trump or Republicans do or say must be accepted without opposition, and the remedy, for the "breeding hatred" Democrats is "they must be rejected."
by NCD on Tue, 07/16/2019 - 12:14am
Jay Rosen and Sewell Chan and LATimes editorial board talking about the conundrum:
It's not like the serious media doesn't realize it's a problem, they do. But if they don't address it, social media will and then people (like rmrd for example, trying to point to every single racist thing he does or says with lists) demand that they do cover it or they get a enabling label if not a racist label themselves.
There's really only a little difference between how people disagree whether one should follow "don't feed the troll" on a website like this one or attack what the troll says out of principle and start swinging. The troll wants attention and/or to get a rise out of people, same thing like Trump. For most trolls, it also gives a sense of control that they can manipulate a group, that part is so natural to Trump that it's part of his personality, i.e., all the b.s. about deal making in his past. Art of the deal baloney, it was just all trolling.
by artappraiser on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 8:48pm
and here's Laura Rozen pointing out first amendment activist Jameel Jaffer pointing to Marty Lederman's blog post @ Balkinization on same:
by artappraiser on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 8:57pm
by artappraiser on Mon, 07/15/2019 - 10:22pm
Remnick is correct that Trump voters will have to own the racism if they continue to support him. But for the G.O.P., this latest development creates a resource problem. Now that the dogs have tasted steak, they won't be satisfied with chewing on Kibble any longer.
by moat on Tue, 07/16/2019 - 12:04pm
No, they won't "have to own it" - there are plenty of people who deny or downplay their behavior, whatever the rest of the world says. Implausible deniability is still a thing.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 07/16/2019 - 2:11pm
I hear that. There certainly is not going to be much "owning up to it." But if more and more people begin to openly express themselves as their fearful leader does, it is going to change the dynamic. The double speak won't be strong enough for those who enjoy not having to hide their feelings anymore.
by moat on Tue, 07/16/2019 - 2:33pm
The dogs are already slathering for the tastier stuff:
Trump's racist tweets distill into a 2020 campaign rallying cry.
by moat on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 8:46am
Mitch here appears to me to be thinking: hey this is just like Lee Atwater taught us to do, worked then, it will work now?
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 12:30pm
In an anonymous interview, Lee Atwater, spoke of the importance of keeping a firewall between the economic messaging by such as Mitch, and the dirty trick compartment:
So the latest eruption is at variance with this approach because race and tribalism is a dominant issue now and the dirty tricks are being performed at the top. Fans screaming "Send her Back" is not just a way to get back at liberal policies. And in so far as they are a way to do that, Mitch is enabling a specific element of disenfranchisement as a means for those ends to be carried out.
by moat on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 8:22pm
interesting, thanks for sharing it
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 8:25pm
I missed this, Mitch got walloped back with a good one, couldn't do anything except ignore:
by artappraiser on Fri, 07/19/2019 - 12:27am