MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
After criticizing Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) during a rally in Greenville, North Carolina, the crowd erupts into chants of "send her back."
America is circling the drain of racism, ignorance and hate. This will not end well.
Comments
I think in Omar's case, she did it to herself. If you can turnoff diehard Dems like Wolraich and Bruce Levine this easily, you are red meat for the righties. She's clueless,I could see it coming, she did it to herself, she made herself a mark for them.
You run in the reality you have, not an imaginary place where there's no pushback. Here's more evidence how savvy she has been at handling political problems, from wikipedia:
I really have no sympathy, as opposed to some like, say, Hillary, who tried really hard not to get labeled. Omar could care less, she is clueless, will say more stupid shit that is red meat for agitprop, I am sure. She approached the role of being a Congressperson like a naive college kid just spouting unthought out shit.
by artappraiser on Wed, 07/17/2019 - 11:28pm
To a certain degree I agree with you. But in the end it wouldn't matter what Omar said or did. She's a Muslim who dresses as one. The republican base is primed to hate that and to hate her. Yes she made it easy for them. If she was wiser politically it would have been marginally more difficult to attack her but they'd have got there any way.
by ocean-kat on Wed, 07/17/2019 - 11:51pm
what kind of savvy politician responds to a critical newspaper editorial this way?
Who goes into elected politics to storm the barricades and tear down the "establishment"? Sounds like a radical sophomore in college, could be either far left or far right.
by artappraiser on Wed, 07/17/2019 - 11:56pm
It sounds like you're blaming the victim. The problem isn't that Republicans are attacking Omar; it's how they're attacking her, focusing not on her words but on her race and religion. There's no excuse for that.
PS I also agree with Kat that they'd be doing this anyway, no matter what she said.
by Michael Wolraich on Mon, 07/22/2019 - 10:41pm
Party like it's 1925!
by NCD on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 12:10am
did not start well
which makes how he gets away with the whole Saudi thing quite amazing
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 12:47am
hmmm
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 12:48am
Maybe Fitbit can develop a nepotism meter to figure out if a raggety immigrant stands a chance of pulling the corrupt strings of American manifest destiny, of successfully rigging the system - if not, out wid ya.
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 3:19am
Er,fuggedaboutit. Was all temporary trolling for fun, distraction and electoral profit. Time to recant:
Trump Disavows ‘Send Her Back’ Chant
1828 comments
current NYTimes headline story, published 5 hrs. ago
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 8:22pm
TRUMP WINS! Front page again!
It's all about personal control, attention getting, and media manipulation with Trump.
It's why he won't start a war, or do anything to upset his love bro Kim. Not bad really, does give cretin Bolton a belittling feeling of impotence.
by NCD on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 9:00pm
Methinks Chris Hayes doth protest a bit too much:
I bet it's this easy, Chris: tell producer that you are going to cover something else or quit.
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 10:38pm
WaPo's new and surprising backgrounder worth a read on wha'append?-- not the same old "winning", rather, stuff such as this:
from ‘He always doubles down’: Inside the political crisis caused by Trump’s racist tweets, July 20 at 2:43 PM;
written with the help of LOTSA LEAKERS--MAYBE A RECORD?! based on interviews with 26 White House aides, advisers, lawmakers and others involved in the response — most of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to share behind-the-scenes details so as to require 4 reporters: by Michael Scherer,Josh Dawsey, Ashley Parker and Seung Min Kim
geez he needs a lot of people to clean up his knee-jerk messes...the babysitting getting to be a bit much? something's got to give?
by artappraiser on Sun, 07/21/2019 - 3:11am
Faux anger at the enemy-of-the-people messenger when actually it's his own people leaking: Trump lashes out at Washington Post over reporting: 'Presidential Harassment!' by Justin Wise @ TheHill.com, 07/21/19
For me the question is: how purposeful is this trolling? Is it real anger or intended to keep attention on the meme and distraction from other things? Are the leaking staff in on it, are their leaks purposeful in support or real complaining about his behavior? Gives me a headache thinking about it....another world, another reality: Crazytown.
by artappraiser on Sun, 07/21/2019 - 3:44pm
We will see if the dogs will go back to eating Kibble.
by moat on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 9:55pm
How odd, even Hannity is trying to spin them Kibble. The RNC must have gotten some devastating focus group or poll responses or something?
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 10:12pm
As if they have a clue what her views are. Few of them even have knowledge of the distortions of her views spread in the right wing press. Homo Sapiens is a violent species. We like getting angry. We enjoy screaming abuse at enemies. Both liberals and conservatives, though slightly more of the violent seem to gravitate toward republicans. We love our two minutes of hate.
by ocean-kat on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 10:59pm
Uh, shouldn't large scale child rape be our focus at the moment?
Or is that forgotten already?
I mean, the Epstein bail hearing was just 1 day ago? 2?
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 07/19/2019 - 5:42am
Did you notice I was replying to a comment? I thought my reply germane. I'm at a loss to see how child rape would be a fitting reply but you can school me by replying to Arta with your discussion of rape. Or start a thread on the subject. I promise not to interject my thoughts on Trump's rallies on your child rape thread.
by ocean-kat on Fri, 07/19/2019 - 6:26am
Did you notice the whole world was replying to an event, how this guy who'd raped dozens of underage girls had gotten off but then got rearrested, and then the President yelled out "you chicks over there are a bunch of doo-doo heads - with bad haircuts!" and now we're debating the moral wrongs of calling someone a doo-doo head. Raping underage girls? Not so much.
But I'll let you get back to the collective non-sequitur, since I'm sure we'll figure out racism, vs the more complicated issue of whether if a President participated in raping 13-year-olds should he go to jail now or after he finishes 8 years of fucked up destructive presidency.
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 07/19/2019 - 8:29am
Same Old Tactics
We let him shift from an issue that would disgust many of his base - whether it's Pence sent to talk away concentration camps or Trump's old slimy-looking friendship with pedo Epstein to discussing coverup payments with Cohen & Hope Hicks, back to a "send the brownskins back" posture that thrills his supporters and shuts up his lukewarm fellow-GOP enablers.
"Mission Control, all's good - we've landed, turbulence handled".
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 07/19/2019 - 9:36am
The Joy of Hatred
by ocean-kat on Fri, 07/19/2019 - 3:09pm
Weld's advisor, former Romney chief strategist:
by artappraiser on Thu, 07/18/2019 - 11:33pm
It's not kibble. The focus on "America love it or leave it" is the main food they want and he knows it. If he didn't know it when he did the knee-jerk bashing of the squad with a racial edge to it, he knows it now, it's become clear that's where to take it. The racial thing is secondary, goes naturally with MAGA-return to white privilege times, not direct racism, it's indirect--the "America love it or leave it" of the 1960's is what sold and is still what sells with the fans. That's what they voted for him. It's the same old main culture war issue of the 60's, elite multi-culti educated college kids protesting the U.S. culture vs. hardscrabble working class moving up the ladder and proud patriots of the culture. Here he realizes it 8 hrs. ago with renewed vigor:
That tweet is combined with new attacks against "the squad". Here the squad is the same old dirty hippie socialists as always, want everything for free, don't want to work for it, want someone else to pay for it...
by artappraiser on Sun, 07/21/2019 - 3:57pm
by artappraiser on Sun, 07/21/2019 - 4:22pm
There's always this attempt to put planning and agency behind Trump's tweets. We saw the same thing with Obama when he made an error or when progressives disagreed what he said. The response from his supporters was to ignore what was said and claim that he was playing 13th dimension chess.
Trump's base likes him because he's like them. There may be some after the fact evaluation of how effective his comments were that increases or decreases how often he says things but I don't think there's thought and planning before he says things. He's just blurting out whatever his gut tells him he thinks.
It reminds me of a story I read years ago about Lennon and McCarthy writing a song for the Rolling Stones. They were just starting out and were nervous about writing songs so Lennon and McCarthy just wrote one in about 15 minutes. At one point Jagger asked about a certain phrase and what it meant. Lennon replied it doesn't matter. The listeners will come up with all sorts of explanations and deep complicated metaphors to explain it. Things that I never thought about or considered when I wrote the lyrics.
by ocean-kat on Sun, 07/21/2019 - 5:05pm
By arguing for a satiation based model to view Trump's rabid fans, I am not arguing that all of them self-identify as racists. This is not Wallace standing in front of a school door forbidding black kids from entering it. What the fans have been promised is that their problems stem from being ripped off.
All the hippies either died, became successful people, or now welcome people at Walmart (Er, that is not an exclusive list of actual outcomes). The present emphasis on the old derogation of the "U.S. haters" steers clear of Sanders, Warren, or anyone else who happens to be white and espouse "socialists" tropes. What is one to make of that differential? The Hillary hate does not count because she has been put in the elite category.
I don't ask that last question as a rhetorical gotcha but as a piece with my first observation that someone has to burn under the promise that only "other" people are the cause of a problem. I certainly did not draw up the list for the Republicans.
by moat on Sun, 07/21/2019 - 5:57pm
Yes, most of them likely think they are not racists. In some ways they're like my father, an old school steel worker union democrat. Center right to conservative. Reagan democrat. They've eliminated most of the overt racism from their thinking and speech. They wouldn't call black people "boy" or "nigger." But they haven't thought about subtle or unconscious racism.
by ocean-kat on Sun, 07/21/2019 - 6:06pm
Or the Institutional kind. That, also, is difficult to fully comprehend, and having done so, do something helpful about.
by moat on Sun, 07/21/2019 - 6:20pm
"This is not Wallace standing in front of a school door forbidding black kids from entering it"
No. It's a President issuing orders for officers to stand at the border to forbid desperate people from entering this country.
People seeking safety and asylum. Or letting them in and locking them up in overcrowded cages.
History rhymes.
WaPo:
"....The Trump administration’s policies have turned the process into a Kafkaesque nightmare. My colleagues and I have interviewed thousands of asylum seekers from Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras and told them that they had to return to Mexico while their cases were processed — knowing all the while that they might be kidnapped, assaulted or killed...."
by NCD on Sun, 07/21/2019 - 6:34pm
I was thinking about how the statements are not parallel in many ways but the comparison is too well done for me to deny.
by moat on Sun, 07/21/2019 - 7:17pm
Your bringing the blocking kids from a "white" school made me think a President representing our entire nation, blocking 'brown' people at the border while labeling them rapists and freeloaders, is frankly, even worse.
One segregationist governor pushing school segregation in one university in one state was stopped. No one can stop Trump, and the GOP base never wants it stopped.
by NCD on Sun, 07/21/2019 - 7:53pm
Why racism angle will fail
https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/dispute-builds-o...
Though I did like the line "once you lie you no longer have a seat at the table" - does this Republican apply this rule to the President?
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 07/22/2019 - 4:06pm