MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Report by The Skeptic Research Center and the Worldview Foundations Research Team, Feb. 20, 2021
Research Question: This is the seventh report from the Civil Unrest and Presidential Election Study (CUPES). In this report, we investigate a complex and defining issue of 2020 (and, no doubt, many years ahead): race and policing. Amidst calls to “defund” and reform police agencies, informed understandings of police-citizen interactions are crucial. So, here we ask the question: across the political spectrum, how knowledgeable are people when it comes to the available data on fatal police shootings of Black Americans? [....]
Summary of Findings:
1. The available data on police shootings of unarmed Black men is incomplete; however, existing data indicate that somewhere between 13-27 unarmed black men were killed by police in 2019. Adjusted for the number of law enforcement agencies that have yet to provide data, this number may be higher, perhaps between 60-100.
• Yet, over half (53.5%) of those reporting “very liberal” political views estimated that 1,000 or more unarmed Black men were killed, a likely error of at least an order of magnitude (see Figure 1).
2. The available data suggest that 24.9% of people killed by police in 2019 were Black. However, across the political spectrum, survey participants overestimated this number.
• Those who reported being “liberal” or “very liberal” were particularly inaccurate, estimating the proportion to be 56% and 60%, respectively (see Figure 2).
Take-home Messages:
1. Our overall findings indicate that people are uninformed regarding the available data on fatal police shootings in the US.
2. Specifically, we found that the more people reported being “liberal” or “very liberal” on social and fiscal matters, the greater the discrepancy between the available data and their estimations.
3. What might explain peoples’ misestimations of these statistics? Is it liberals’ relatively greater concern with racism? Differential media consumption?
Perhaps you have an idea or explanation you’d like to share? Have an interpretation of this you want to share? Email it to [email protected] [....]
Comments
by artappraiser on Mon, 02/22/2021 - 8:48pm
later additions to Goldberg's thread:
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/23/2021 - 12:51am
Wikipedia on The Skeptics Society
by artappraiser on Mon, 02/22/2021 - 8:55pm
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/23/2021 - 12:31am
edit to add Jilani's second tweet, which coincidentally makes a point related to the phenomenon illustrated in the graph in tweet #8 by Goldberg above:
Myself, as to this chicken-or-egg arguement, I think there's a name for it used in history: mass hysteria. The media covers what's "hot" emotionally. In a profit-driven system, they can't afford to try to force feed news that large numbers are not interested in. (Yes, "click bait" nowadays...)
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/23/2021 - 12:59am
Hysteria/"hot" yes, but most people also don't realize the structural impediment of prosecuting police under Qualified Immunity going all the way to the Supreme Court, putting onerous requirements to prove way beyond any normal police duty to actually convict. This week's ruling starts to correct that. Sure, 27 is not very many compared to say 300 murders/shootings per year in many major cities, but we are emotional creatures, and it draws our ire due to its unfairness. Of course police can't be 2nd guessing themselves with every dangerous encounter, but the George Floyd indifferent callousness should stop. And then hopefully we can focus on structural urban violence for one.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 02/23/2021 - 1:11am
A reminder that the 27 is for blacks only, it's only one quarter of those killed. But we didn't do months of protests over the other 3/4 because the whole problem was (incorrectly) racialized. Racialization that resulted in unrelated things like tearing down statues and riots and looting by one race, which only serves to racialize things further...meanwhile in this "systemically racist" country of white supremacy which supposedly causes police to kill white people more often then black, we again have a mixed race person in one of the highest offices...
It's a police problem! As regards people in lower echelons of society of all colors. Not a racism problem! Yes, stick to the problem is all I am saying. Whittling down qualified immunity is an excellent start at attacking the problem. Not tearing down statues and looting.
This study specifically says: it's not about racism, that's all in your head, liberals. Can liberals manage to not be as conspiracy minded as many nuts on the right? Apparently not, anything bad going on has to fit into "the big narrative". Currently the big narrative is white supremacy and racism, a big giant plot by whypipple.
I know what's coming next: whaddabout all those racist right wing Trump supporting nuts that have infiltrated all the police forces? Ya know what, I think I''ll just say no to buying the systemic racism narrative on that one, too, l'll wait for the study that's probably coming down the road that says they happen within forces as frequently as in the general population. (Not that they should be, police should of course be vetted to be better quality people than any tom dick or harry general population. But still.)
Furthermore, if liberals had taken the fucking racism label away from this problem, they might have had a whole lot more good police on their side the whole time! Instead they reinforced police tribalism as a reaction.
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/23/2021 - 1:43am
Well, that ignores the "arrest the nearest black guy" syndrome - we're not just talking about killings, and again we can ask how many whites are falsely accused, but I still think there's quite a bit more structural suspicion and harassment of blacks than deserved, which of course hlstill has to take into account rap killings and black high crime areas and other issues. We need a reset, some new workable guidelines and approaches, part to lower unnecessary profiling (yes, part of what cops should be doing is profiling, but...), part to improve community interaction while still responding to crime (even getting more positive public feed-in to the process, since the idea *is* to protect the public. Still, there are only so many applicants for the job of street cop.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 02/23/2021 - 2:57am
True that you don't see many articles with the headline "White Teen Arrested While Walking Home". Wonder why that is?
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/23/2021 - 12:51pm
"IF I LIKE IT, IT'S DATA; IF I DON'T LIKE IT, IT'S 'ANECDATA.'"
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/23/2021 - 12:54pm
Qualified Immunity takes a dent
Supreme Court *starts* to show skepticism, actually a major step in police accountability vs invincibility
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 02/23/2021 - 1:04am