Genghis on Debt Ceiling II: Return of the Boehner
Gallup: Obama 45, Romney 45
Fact That Things Suck Cited As Impediment To Re-Election
|
Genghis on Debt Ceiling II: Return of the Boehner Gallup: Obama 45, Romney 45 Fact That Things Suck Cited As Impediment To Re-Election |
Read |
Congressman Mike Pence (R-IN) and Congressman Howard Berman (D-CA) have introduced a resolution expressing support for Iranian citizens, condemning the violence in Iran, and spouting off about the importance of free and fair elections.
Berman said, “It is not for us to decide who should run Iran, much less determine the real winner of the June 12 election…but we must reaffirm our strong belief that the Iranian people have a fundamental right to express their views about the future of their country freely, and without intimidation.”
When I read this statement, my immediate thought was, “Why?”
Why must we reaffirm our belief in freedom of expression and democracy? It’s not exactly a big secret that the United States holds these beliefs. And, current decade notwithstanding, we can be pretty good at working with longstanding and emerging democracies around the world.
Where we fail, again and again, is trying to overlay not only our ideals but how we put those ideals into practice onto countries whose cultures and traditions are different from ours. Our leaders have not, over the long term, shown much imagination when it comes to understanding that other societies might have their own path to achieving such important ends as freedom and democracy.
Smart, experienced foreign policy experts of all political persuasions have suggested that President Obama has taken exactly the right approach to the situation in Iran, and that any strong response by the United States could be used by the Iranian government against the protesters. Yet, conservative members of the House and Senate, as well as conservative talk show hosts, have been insisting over and over that the President is not going far enough; that he needs to decry the election results and make demands.
In my opinion, these people don’t know anything about Iran, don’t care about Iran or the Iranian people, and couldn’t care less what position they’re advocating for as long as it’s the opposite of what the President is doing. That’s become the Right’s MO on all issues since Obama took office. Whatever Obama says is wrong—reason, public opinion, and even public safety be damned.
And here we go again. Iran is reaching a tipping point. After the Ayatollah’s speech today, protests are now increasingly dangerous. What will happen on Saturday, when protesters return to the streets? I don’t know, but I fear the worst. I fear that the government will put down the protests, brutally and violently.
Pence, Berman, and the like are behaving as if they are blind to this potential outcome. They see an opportunity to score political points, and if it results in the deaths of tens or hundreds or thousands of citizens in a country so far away, who cares? The goal is to undermine the President for the benefit of the Repbulican party.
Such naked narcissism takes my breath away.
By Nancy Benac, Associated Press, May 16, 2012
After the nastiness of the Republican primary race, former candidates have collective amnesia about Romney disses
Note to self: you think you're so smart about this kinda stuff, but you yourself fell for it once again.....so much for all the prognostication about one of our political parties disintegrating from all the primary campaign animosity.
Pew Resarch Center for the People and the Press, May 15, 2012
For decades survey research has provided trusted data about political attitudes and voting behavior, the economy, health, education, demography and many other topics. But political and media surveys are facing significant challenges as a consequence of societal and technological changes.
It has become increasingly difficult to contact potential respondents and to persuade them to participate. The percentage of households in a sample that are successfully interviewed – the response rate – has fallen dramatically. At Pew Research, the response rate of a typical telephone survey was 36% in 1997 and is just 9% today. The general decline in response rates is evident across nearly all types of surveys, in the United States and abroad. At the same time, greater effort and expense are required to achieve even the diminished response rates of today. These challenges have led many to question whether surveys are still providing accurate and unbiased information [....]
On May 16, 2012 at 7:00 PM, the Ride of Silence will begin in North America and roll across the globe. Cyclists will take to the roads in a silent procession to honor cyclists who have been killed or injured while cycling on public roadways. Although cyclists have a legal right to share the road with motorists, the motoring public often isn't aware of these rights, and sometimes not aware of the cyclists themselves.
...
The Ride of Silence is a free ride that asks its cyclists to ride no faster than 12 mph, wear helmets, follow the rules of the road and remain silent during the ride. There are no sponsors and no registration fees. The ride, which is held during National Bike Month, aims to raise the awareness of motorists, police and city officials that cyclists have a legal right to the public roadways. The ride is also a chance to show respect for and honor the lives of those who have been killed or injured.
A new UCLA rat study is the first to show how a diet steadily high in fructose slows the brain, hampering memory and learning — and how omega-3 fatty acids can counteract the disruption. The peer-reviewed Journal of Physiology publishes the findings in its May 15 edition.
"Our findings illustrate that what you eat affects how you think," said Fernando Gomez-Pinilla, a professor of neurosurgery at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and a professor of integrative biology and physiology in the UCLA College of Letters and Science. "Eating a high-fructose diet over the long term alters your brain's ability to learn and remember information. But adding omega-3 fatty acids to your meals can help minimize the damage."
While earlier research has revealed how fructose harms the body through its role in diabetes, obesity and fatty liver, this study is the first to uncover how the sweetener influences the brain.
The UCLA team zeroed in on high-fructose corn syrup, an inexpensive liquid six times sweeter than cane sugar, that is commonly added to processed foods, including soft drinks, condiments, applesauce and baby food. The average American consumes more than 40 pounds of high-fructose corn syrup per year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
"We're not talking about naturally occurring fructose in fruits, which also contain important antioxidants," explained Gomez-Pinilla, who is also a member of UCLA's Brain Research Institute and Brain Injury Research Center. "We're concerned about high-fructose corn syrup that is added to manufactured food products as a sweetener and preservative."
[Better write this down]
Christopher Doyon, a.k.a. Commander X, sits atop a hillside in an undisclosed location in Canada, watching a reporter and photographer make their way along a narrow path to join him, away from the prying eyes of law enforcement.
It’s been a few weeks of encrypted emails back and forth, working out the security protocol to follow for interviewing Doyon, one of the brains behind Anonymous, now a fugitive from the FBI.
Doyon, who readily admits taking part in some of the highest-profile hacktivist attacks on websites last year — from Tunisia to Orlando, Sony to PayPal — was arrested in September for a comparatively minor assault on the county website of Santa Cruz, Calif., where he was living, in retaliation for the town forcibly removing a homeless encampment on the courthouse steps.
The “virtual sit-in” lasted half an hour. For that, Doyon is facing 15 years in jail.
Many partisans--Republicans and Democrats--disagree with everything their opponents say for political points, and Pence and Berman may well be among them, but there are also plenty of Republicans that seem to genuinely believe that shouting their opinions about foreign elections is helpful to the opposition. Bush-Cheney undercut sympathetic political parties from Venezuela to Lebanon plenty of times by cheering for their favorite horses. I don't get it. The folks who subscribe to this philosophy seem unable to grasp the subtle possibility that speaking out is not always the most effective way to support your allies.
You're absolutely right about their being partisans on both sides. I'm so sick of it. I wrote this post before they voted. Now that they have, I hate them all. The resolution passed 405 to 1, with only Ron Paul voting against it.
I hope the Democrats feel all warm and fuzzy tomorrow when the crackdown starts. Assholes.
As of right now, Orlando, Mousavi is not calling for another demo on Saturday. So that ratchets back a bit the risk of bloody confrontations. Instead, he and the two other defeated candidates will be making their legal pitches to the Guardian Council, which in turn promises to respond Sunday on how it intends to proceed.
There are 646 separate complaints, so I can't see any way that they can summarily dismiss all of them. If they did, that' would be pretty solid evidence of a coverup, and would reinvigorate the opposition. So there will be some kind of probe and/or recount. The question is how probing the probe will be.
You're absolutely right about the American right. They couldn't care less about Mousavi, or about promoting democracy in Iran. All they can see is a chance to destabilize the country; if there's a backlash and a crackdown leading to more totalitarian rule, all the more reason to bomb.
In case I haven't made it clear, Obama's approach has been absolutely correct, reasoned and astute. He hasn't burned any bridges to Ahmadinejad, whom he's going to have to deal with if he wants Mideast peace and stability.
I think even Supreme Leader Khamenei recognized this (in a backhand way) when in his Friday speech he singled out Britain, not the U.S., as the biggest meddler in Iranian internal affairs.
By contrast, you've got morons like Krauthammer who are frothing over the prospect of blood running in Tehran's streets: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/18/AR2009061803495.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
Wisely, the opposition apparently backed off the idea of another mass protest today. The 2,000-3,000 who turned out anyway are not necessarily the best representatives Mousavi has to offer. Reports suggest that some torched an Ahmadinejad office, and that a suicide bomber struck at the shrine to Ayatollah Khomeini -- not the kind of actions that solidify public support; Khomeini continues to be widely revered. Still, aside from the bomber, there's been no reported bloodbath -- always a good thing, in my book.
As I said above, today was the day the defeated candidates were invited to make their cases to the Guardian Council. Mousavi and Karroubi didn't show up. If they are abandoning their legal appeal, I think that's an admission they really have lost.