Donal's picture

    Occupy Baltimore Begins


    I walked over to see Occupy Baltimore today. First I saw a large group of people doing jumping jacks. That turned out to be Health City. Then I got to McKeldin Square, at the corner of Pratt and Light Streets in view of Inner Harbor. There were maybe fifty people, including a dozen journalists and half a dozen police (poh-leece), three of them on motorcycles. A few dozen onlookers stood around the edges of the small plaza but it seemed clear that they weren't part of it.

    No one was doing calisthenics, but a few casually-dressed people were on their knees writing signs on sheets. I felt like saying, "Please don't misspell morons." A camera-toting fellow was interviewing a fellow with a beard, who made it clear that he didn't speak for everyone, but who was the only one speaking. A fellow wearing a LaRouche breadboard was handing out flyers, and a few folk were holding copies of a thin Workers' Week paper. The bearded fellow invited anyone to make a sign.

    I noticed a young man with bleached blond hair in front, tinted green in back. He was wearing a long, black, woven tunic with a gold arrow pointing up, and no pants. A bulge made me wonder if was wearing underwear. Naturally he was soon being interviewed. Kory said he was a native Baltimorean. I listened to his interview, then spoke to him for a few moments. He seemed to assume I'd be against the demonstration, and seemed relieved when I told him I supported the idea. He was joined by a fellow in a camo shirt, and they unveiled a largish, Occupy Baltimore sign.

    WYPR was interviewing an unemployed carpenter named McGuire. He spoke very well about Occupy being a "nascent movement," and diplomatically answered questions about whether he expected any trouble. He said he didn't expect trouble, wasn't there to make trouble, and in fact the group had committed to a peaceful demonstration, but he was aware that in times of change, trouble sometimes happens anyway. (So I slugged him.)

    He had a list of personal wishes, one of which that the government not build a $300 million dollar juvenile detention facility instead of improving schools. He said that the government looked at test scores to plan on how many kids would turn to crime. He said he'd given up two bus tickets to go to Occupy Wall Street for this, but would be there this weekend. When WYPR was finished, WBAL began interviewing him. (No, I didn't really hit him.)

    By that time there were maybe a dozen signs being held: People Not Profit, Feed the Hungry, etc., but there was no discernable excitement and the journalists were getting antsy. The motorcycle cops vroomed away. I had to get back to work. It was a start.

    Chez Pazienza blogged about Occupy Wall Street yesterday:

    When "Occupy Wall Street" first started, it bugged the hell out of me. Anyone who's read this site long enough should immediately understand what my issues might be with a bunch of kids who seem pissed that they missed out on the 60s -- and to a lesser degree, that the summer Phish tour wrapped up -- storming Lower Manhattan to unleash a metric ton of inchoate, incoherent rage through drum circles and a whole lot of Guy Fawkes masks. For years now I've very publicly decried the old school model of left-wing protest for the simple reason that the rules have changed drastically and to pretend that they haven't will quickly render any form of push-back activism moot.

    Chez doesn't have much patience with boomer, hippy wannabees, but he does pay attention and he sees something happening:

    But admittedly, something has happened over the past week or so: A single, fundamental message of Occupy Wall Street has begun to coalesce, and a series of disorganized grievances has slowly started to dovetail into one, coherent movement. What's more, the outrage voiced by a few has lit a match to the anger felt by millions -- and the resulting fire is now spreading rapidly, with similar protests flaring up across the country. Occupy Wall Street may have started as a muddled gathering of occasionally conflicting ideas, but it was the spark that was needed to potentially create a conflagration. And it's damn well about time.

    So I hope he's right and that Occupy Baltimore will grow from a rather quiet gathering to something that will be noticed.

    Topics: 

    Comments

    First of all...

    First I saw a large group of people doing jumping jacks. That turned out to be Health City.

    At first I thought you were describing Seattle!

    Then this:

    I felt like saying, "Please don't misspell morons."

    Hahahahaha.

    Then you killed me off with the description of the kid in his woven shirt and no pants I almost couldn't continue I was laughing way to hard.


    Sharon Astyk blogged a dissenting opinion in, Don't Feed the Zombies: The Problem of Protesting the Thing You Depend On:

    A number of readers have asked me what I think about the Wall Street protests. In general I think public protest is usually a good thing, and I'm pleased to see demonstrations in favor of good things like corporate accountability and against bad things like climate change. I think there are plenty of reasons for political activism in our country, and am always pleased by it.

    On the other hand, do I think that this is the beginning of something profound and important? I can't say for sure, but I would guess not. Protesting Wall Street isn't a bad idea - but there's a fundamental problem in marching and demonstrating against something you are wholly dependent upon. ...

    Standing against Wall Street and calling them out to justify their implication in the political process and in issues like climate change is great - except that Wall Street gets its money in large part from, well, us. An economy that depends for 70% of its worth on consumer spending is not one in which one can look entirely to the powerful abstract evil of "corporations" but to the specific evil of that fact that all of us depend for food, clothing and shelter on those institutions we claim to deplore.

    This is the same problem that leads those who protest middle-eastern oil wars to drive their cars to the demonstrations, to those who protest coal plants writing their angry blog posts on grid, coal powered laptops, and any number of other hypocrisies. Now hypocrisy itself is not evil, and it is generally inevitable - none of us can live here without implication in a larger economic system - all of us are complicit.


    And the problem of protesting the thing you depend upon is more so in NYC than in probably anyplace else. Facts are that while teh Wall Street doesn't pay federal taxes in an amount to anyone's liking except themselves, what they pay to NYC does make up a big big part of the NYC government coffers. Without tourist taxes and them, NYC would be in deep shit. I been here a few decades and have seen a couple cycles of this happening: if it's a bad bonus year on Wall Street, the local government has deficit problems. NYC very much depends on that money and even plans its budgets with their fortunes in mind.

    To be clear, I'm not offering an opinion on the protests, just saying Astyk's point is more so in NYC than anywhere else. Maybe that doesn't matter.

    Edit to add one thing: this might be why attendance is not that contagious in NYC but could be better elsewhere.


    I think it is a cumulative thing. These gatherings are being mentioned all over the web, all over cable.

    And Shorty Bloomberg is pissed.

    If it were not for the injuries, it would all be good.

    I have no idea what could result from all of this unless a hundred thousand showed up on Wall Street.

     


    A fellow wearing a LaRouche breadboard

    Sometimes it seems to me that they somehow manage to know about every demonstration going on everywhere about anything and have someone show up there pronto. Just goes to show you how cults can be a pretty efficient method of operation.cheeky


    "He said he didn't expect trouble, wasn't there to make trouble, and in fact the group had committed to a peaceful demonstration, but he was aware that in times of change, trouble sometimes happens anyway. (So I slugged him.)"

    I'm still laughing.  That is a truly hilarious line.


    In The Sun (which BTW is moving to a paywall scheme next week):

    Some are out of work. Some can't afford to visit a doctor. Others are sick of corporate greed. Most blame financial institutions for the tumbling economy. They think the rich are trampling on the poor and middle class and getting away with it.

    They're fed up, and they're willing to camp out in downtown Baltimore to voice their complaints.

    Protesters staging Baltimore's version of Occupy Wall Street converged on the Inner Harbor on Tuesday, bringing an array of grievances but one common theme — corporate America and government have bankrupted the country and their pocketbooks.

     

    At 10 p.m., up to 125 people gathered at McKeldin Square, far from the hundreds who had signed up on Facebook, far from the numbers seen in New York, where the movement started and where police have arrested scores over the past several days. The protests there have turned confrontational.

    Earlier in the day, up to 50 people gathered. The protesters, many holding hand-painted signs, said that if nothing else, the outdoor sit-in — which organizers hope will draw hundreds more over the next few days — gives people a chance to vent.


    Kory made it on youtube:


    I think this was filmed after I went back to work:


    Latest Comments