MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Beneath the Spin * Eric L. Wattree
I thought I was done discussing the illustrious Dr. Cornel West, but he just won’t seem to go away. But that’s ok, because he’s serving a useful purpose. The Cornel West saga has served to open the eyes of many in the Black community to the petty, self-serving agenda of many of the so-called Black intellectuals, and none too soon. The time is way past due for the Black community to wake up to the fact that the only intellect that they can truly depend on is their own.
.
But once again Dr. Boyce Watkins and many other Black scholars are running to the defense of Cornel West, trying their best to defend the indefensible. The question is why? Is it really a matter of principle or are they actually trying to defend their stature in the Black community? Are their efforts actually an attempt to cover up the fact that many within their ranks are absolute idiots? If that's the case, they might as well give up because, thanks to Cornel West, the cat is out of the bag, and I'm loving it.
.
But Boyce has written yet another article in defense of Cornel West for Your Black World - “Dr. Boyce: Tom Joyner’s Tasteless Assault on Tavis Smiley and Cornel West.” As the title suggests, Watkins still doesn’t seem to understand that there is no difference between an ad hominem attack on the character of President Obama, and the same kind of attack on Cornel West. He seems to take the position that an attack on the character of the president is a “critique,” but an attack on the character of Cornel West is grossly unconscionable. Go fingur it.
.
As a columnist I’ve become accustomed to seeing that kind of convoluted thinking, so I simply use it as grist for my mill, but what concerns me about it are those who rely on the efficient thought of the scholars who engage in it. After all, if you look up to those who constantly engage in inefficient thinking, you’re going to become a flawed thinker yourself, and that’s a big problem, not only in the Black community, but in America as a whole.
.
Here’s an example. One responder to Dr. Watkins’ article said the following:
.
“Dr. Cornel West is easily twice as intelligent as Tom Joiner (sic). In fact Dr. West is a genius and Mr. Joiner realizes this.”
.
What evidence does the writer have to substantiate that statement? Absolutely none. Like many of us, the writer is confusing literacy with intellect. Intelligence is the capacity to assess and creatively manipulate information that literates merely regurgitate. Thus, all the writer could possibly know with respect to the relative intelligence of West and Joyner is West's propensity to regurgitate. He knows absolutely nothing regarding Joyner's ability to assess and process that information. So the writer's thinking is flawed, just like the people he apparently relies upon for his information.
.
He’s simply another victim of Cornel West’s corporate sponsors. As I’ve mentioned before, Cornel West is a Harvard-anointed preacher - period. So the writer is only assuming that Cornel West is more intelligent than Tom Joyner because West has been given the accoutrements of alleged knowledge, wisdom, and intellect that the puppeteers confer upon the people they handpick for us to listen to.
.
Even as Cornel West runs around ranting about the corporate “oligarchs and plutocrats” he’s wallowing in the benefits and privilege that those very same people have bestowed upon him. Clear evidence of that is West’s outrage at not being given preferential treatment for inaugural tickets over the guy who “carried my bags.” In spite of all of West's many claims of being a man of the people, he clearly betrayed an arrogant sense of entitlement and superiority over the working class.
.
His defenders try to fluff that off as an inappropriate slip of the tongue, but it’s much more than that. What they’re characterizing as a slip of the tongue actually represents a rare, if not unprecedented, opportunity to see the innermost thoughts of a demagogue. West's remarks clearly revealed that he thinks he’s above the average working-class American - Black or White.
.
The reason that West feels so entitled is because he plays his role so well. The corporate manipulators need people like West. All of his rantings gives the people a sense that help is just over the horizon. That “keeps hope alive,” and thus, the people from rebelling in the street. So people like Tavis, West, and a lot of others who we think we can depend upon play a very important role in our subjugation.
.
In order for the manipulators to control our minds and behavior they create symbols that tell us who’s been certified for us to listen to. Then, in order for us to clearly identify who’s been anointed, they give them robes, uniforms, badges, and titles that either look or sound impressive. If it weren’t for those symbols we wouldn’t know them from any other fool running off at the mouth. My son is a federal agent, and I'm sure that when he walks up to people and pulls out his credentials it scares them to death. But to me he's still that little boy who used to come cuddle up next to me at night because he was afraid of the dark. Think about it. How much reverence would you bestow upon a judge who was sitting behind the bench in a jogging suite?
.
So I suggest that people really start listening to Cornel West. I’ve been doing it every since he betrayed his ignorance by allowing Tavis Smiley to stick his hand in his back and sit him on his knee. A truly intelligent man wouldn’t allow that to happen, because he’d understand the value of integrity and independent thought - and he especially wouldn’t allow someone like Tavis Smiley to control him, because from what I see, Tavis is far from an intellectual giant.
.
I specialize in the use of words myself, so I have a pretty good understanding of their power, meaning, and the way they can be manipulated to mislead. So when I started listening to Cornel West intently, it immediately became clear to me that he specializes in stringing a lot of impressive sounding phrases together that don’t mean a thing. It takes West twenty minutes to say what any reasonably intelligent person can say in one short sentence.
.
The reason for that is, West’s primary intent is not to inform but to mislead less than critical thinkers into thinking that he’s saying something significant. He uses a lot of convoluted phrases and multisyllabic terms that never resolve into a cogent thought. He uses that technique so people who are unsophisticated in the use of words are so impressed by the sound of the words that they don’t recognize that he’s using them to camouflage the fact that he’s not saying anything.
.
When I listen to Cornel West, he reminds me of when I was a young musician. We all loved John Coltrane, because his mind was so quick and he strung so many musical ideas together so fast that his music was extremely busy. That’s why so many of us used to try to emulate him. I got to be very good at it, so the guys on the block who loved jazz but had little or no formal musical training thought I was a young genius. But what they didn’t understand was there was a huge difference between me and John Coltrane - Trane was actually saying something, while I was just making a lot of noise.
.
That’s Cornel West. The wooly hair, the shaggy beard, the over-the-top, super-cool demeanor, it’s all affectation. He wants us to think that he’s so deeply avant-garde that he’s hard to understand - that he’s the Ornette Colman of academia. But the fact is, he’s just a brother who makes a lot of noise and takes a very long time to say very little.
.
Listening to West is like eating rice cake – you can feel it in your mouth so you know you’re chewing something, but it has absolutely no taste or substance. You might as well eat the box that it came in - and the fact that so many other so-called intellectuals can’t seem to see that renders them equally suspect.
.
So I strongly suggest that before people go running headlong into this corporate-sponsored mind control that they stop and ask themselves one very simple question: Can I think of any memorable concept or phrase of any significance that originated with Cornel West in his twenty or so years of public exposure?
.
Take your time and give it some thought.
.
Eric L. Wattree
http://wattree.blogspot.com/
[email protected]
Citizens Against Reckless Middle-Class Abuse (CARMA)
.
Religious bigotry: It's not that I hate everyone who doesn't look, think, and act like me - it's just that God does.
Comments
Pretty good rant.
He is a showman for sure, just as sure as Newt is!
I do get a kick out of watching him though. I mean he postures for each and every line and I think he has those crazy clothes and that crazy hair arrangement just as Lady Gaga has adopted her own crazy persona. hahahah
This reminds me of a racist white friend/client I had years ago.
You know who his favorite radio host was--Rush Limbaugh of course.
But his favorite comic was Dave Chappelle!
And I knew exactly why Chappelle was this bastards favorite comic.
And I think Chappelle walked away 'from it all' on account of doubts he was having with regard to his material--but I do not read minds.
One book I would like to read--which I assume you have already perused--is by Eugene Robinson:
Robinson, Eugene (2010). Disintegration: The Splintering of Black America (First ed.). New York: Doubleday.
He has been selling this book for sometime now so I have heard bits and pieces of his message on this subject.
I have never seen a guy who holds his composure so well with pricks like Buchannan and Scarborough and still refuse to back down!
Sometimes i feel that our President is attempting to emulate Robinson in his dealings with the opposition.
I really would like to know his take on the professor.
by Richard Day on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 5:29am
Richard,
I see them all as showmen and politicians. I'm sure that Obama practices his smile in the mirror every morning too. On the very first day of the election cycle I started hearing a MLK-like quiver in Obama's voice.
They're all so self-serving and disingenuous that watching them is like attending a bad Broadway play. Personally, I think all of Obama's populous rhetoric is setting us up to cave in on medicare and social security. If he does I gonna make Tavis and West sound like they're his most ardent supporters. But I intend to be specific in my criticism, and clearly show a pattern of behavior to support it instead of just throwing out reckless ad hominems. That's what I call myself doing with Cornel West, but he's so grossly over the top that when you layout the facts it looks like character assassination.
Thus, I'm not for one group or another. I see my job as one of pointing out all of their bullshit - and there's plenty of it to point out. In fact, I think Obama's soaring rhetoric may serve to hurt him this cycle, because if the people are anything like me, instead of feeling a lump in the throat it's going to remind them of all the bullshit they bought into in the last campaign.
The Tea Party is just this side of fascism, but they do have one thing right - they're making their politicians dance to their music. That's what progressives are going to have to do. That's why it's so important that we weed the demagogues out. It would really be nice to for once have a movement that is actually for the people, and not the politicians.
by Wattree on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 8:15am
Wattree, it seems to me that African-American voters are our last chance to save this administration from the divisive and destructive wages of its own cynical, triangulating bungling. Obama clearly doesn't give a shit about most progressives, and is on some quixotic mission from God to teach us all a conservative lesson and make us eat our peas and balance our budget in the middle of a quasi-depression. But he does care about his most solid base of political support. Unless the Afircan-American community gets worked up about what is going on here and tells Obama in a clear voice "Enough!!!!", we are all going to end up with knives in our backs and soup lines on our block.
In his pathetic lurch turned toward brain-dead centrism and Hooverite economy-killing, Obama is going to re-tank the economy. And by the time the carnage plays out in the 2012 election, there won't be a Democratic Party or a coherent progressive movement left in this country.
by Dan Kervick on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 11:14pm
If you look at the marriage pledge that Bachmann and Santorum signed that suggests that enslaved black children are better off than black children alive today and the actions of the GOP in actively working to suppress black votes, you will realize that a large scale push against Obama from the black community is unlikely. The GOP monsters are a lot more scary than Obama. The black community will focus on plans that get rid of the GOP.
Regarding the debt ceiling, did you really think that the GOP would agree to any plan that Obama presented. The GOP has even backed away from plans that the GOP created (85% spending cuts; 15% tax increases). Obama won't agree to a plan without tax increases. Boehner won't agree to a plan that raises taxes. It is possible that as the debt ceiling crisis comes to a head, there ,may be a simple bill that simply raises the debt limit without dealing will the overall national debt.
Obama has shown that he is willing to negotiate. The GOP are the obstructionists. Perhaps the public will force the GOP to simply agree to raise the debt limit and deal with other issues later.
by rmrd0000 on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 11:35pm
It's not about Obama the person. It's about the party he leads. Good luck with saving black children from the predations of the likes of Bachman and Santorum after Obama is out on the street after November 2012. Obama is about to re-tank the economy on the basis of the stupid advice he is apparently getting from Sperling, Geithner and Daley. You want to get rid of the GOP? Then work on getting Obama to take the gun away from his own head.
The Treasury Department can just mint the money it needs to pay US government obligations, and so Obama can end this standoff any time he wants:
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/07/scott-fullwiller-qe3-treasury-style%E2%80%94go-around-not-over-the-debt-ceiling-limit.html
He then needs to sound the alarm about, not the debt, but the fact that 9.2% unemployment is a huge heavy anchor that is dragging us all down into Davey Jones's locker.
by Dan Kervick on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 11:48pm
RM,
The problem is, Obama has created his own problem with the GOP. He has demonstrated his tendency to cave so many times that the GOP has incorporated it into their negotiation strategy. As a result, nothing is ever done in Washington until it becomes a crisis, and only then, after the Democrats have to trade a kidney in return.
by Wattree on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 1:58am
The debt ceiling issue was always going to come to crisis level because hat is how the GOP functions. They will disagree with things they agreed with just a few weeks ago. Boehner says the debt ceiling has to be raised. Boehner can't agree to a tax increase. We may just get a bill raising he debt ceiling with the debt lowering issues kicked down the road.
I agree, a backbone is a good thing. Harry Reid is the Senate leader... Really???
Hopefully, Obama will come to future negotiations with a less of "generous" posture.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 7:20am
Dan,
I'm also confused by Obama's behavior in office. I'm beginning to suspect that as a result of living all over the world he's always been an outsider - even here in the U.S., when he was living in Kansas, a conservative stronghold. As a result, he adopted a go-along-to-get-along coping strategy. That strategy has undoubtedly served him well in the past, after all, he's President of the United States. But now that he is president, and in this crucial time in our history, that's the very last thing that we need. We need a president who's decisive, and who clearly understand the seriousness of the GOP threat to this nation. So even though I've been one of his biggest supporters, I intend to start discussing the issue in my column.
by Wattree on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 12:35am
I find Obama confusing as well, Wattree. I can't get a very good read on him. But I assume that like just about everyone he sincerely believes he is doing the right thing and sincerely believes he is doing his best with the hand he's been dealt?
However, I think he has now made a series of very bad choices and is going down a very bad and dangerous path. I don't think the ideas he is expressing about what the country needs at this particular juncture make much sense at all. Whether these are ideas he came in with, or whether he has been mislead by bad advice, I can't say. But I do think that with some stern admonishments from the people who voted for him it is not too late to stop him from making things worse, and it is not too late to get him back on the right path.
by Dan Kervick on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 12:46am
Well, Dan,
I hope you're right, because I intend to lodge a few serious complaints during this campaign season. I'm watching him very carefully, because frankly, if he places social security and medicare on the table for cuts I'm going to suspect that he's engaged in a game of good cop, bad cop with the GOP.
He's just a little too accepting of the patently ridiculous for my tastes. In fact, I wouldn't be a bit surprised if the soaring speeches that he's so known for only serve to anger people in the coming election. They just might remind people of the utter nonsense that they bought into during the last campaign. I know I'm pissed. Obama had me thinking he was gonna be one of the greatest world-shakers since FDR, and now he's poised to give back everything FDR fought for.
by Wattree on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 1:49am
For those who are interested, There is the full video of the dialog between Cornel West and Al Sharpton at the National Newspaper Publishers Association several weeks ago. This was initially billed as a "rematch", but as the drew closer, the "rematch" was changed to a discussion by the NNPA.
I have only seen snippets of the lecture before. The video can now be viewed and commented on by all.
http://www.lasentinel.net/NNPA-Hosts-Historic-Conversation-Between-Rever...
by rmrd0000 on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 4:56pm
Thank you for this, RM.
by Wattree on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 12:37am