oleeb's picture

    High Fives On Reducing Government Healthcare Cost: No Mention Of Reducing Government Costs For War

    "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed."
    Eisenhower---Address to the American Society of Newspaper Editors, April 16, 1953

     

    The United States has been in an official state of emergency ever since World War II.  Put another way, we have been permanently at war for over 60 years.

    There was some justification for the permanent wartime footing of our economy when we had a major, identifiable enemy which was, of course, the Soviet Union.  That threat disappeared almost 20 years ago yet the permanent war economy continues to dominate our national priorities and our government outlays. 

    There is no justification for the national state of emergency any longer and there hasn't been any justification for it, for a very long time.  Just in the past 40 years we have fought in Vietnam killing millions of Indochinese, We have gone to war against Iraq twice, we invaded and occupied Afghanistan, we have been involved in literally dozens of other military operations from the invastion of Santo Domingo, to the USS Pueblo to the Mayaguez to Grenada, Panama, and Somalia.  When we haven't been actively engaged in some sort of mlitary conflict our government nonetheless continues to fuel the war machine as though we were at war. 

    All of the  funds it has taken since 1941 to keep our military the fatest on earth and bloated beyond all reason whether facing a real or mythical "threat" from abroad have been funds that could and should have been used for domestic needs which we have been neglecting here at home in order to remain "strong" in the face of whatever the threat of the moment might be.  We are neglecting and underfunding all our domestic needs such as housing, schools, hospitals, sewers just to name a few.  The list is genuinely endless. 

    Anyone with a memory understands that throughout the past 40 years we have always been told that we never have enough money to address any of our most vital and pressing domestic needs as a people whether that is physical infrastructure, medical research, alleviating poverty, fulfilling our national promise of decent, affordable housing for all citizens and so on.  We have often seen how the investment we have made in military might has destroyed foreign citys and villages.  We have seen the devastation left in the wake or America's unmatched firepower and how it can reduce once thriving cities to ashes.  Seldom do we look at the devastation caused here at home by our ongoing and unnecessarily huge investiment in war and our far too frequent use of war as a tool of foreign policy since the end of World War II. 

    The following pictures were taken this week in a major American city and represent only the tiniest sample of the sort of devastation wrought by the American military and the war conducted on on our cities through lack of investment and disinvestment over the decades because war spending was always given preference.  There are literally tens of thousands of these structures in my city alone.  There are thousands upon thousands of acres of bombed out shells, abandoned homes and businesses like these and it is like this in every city in America. 

    President Obama's Defense Secretary said earlier this year that the President plans to continue to grow the military budget in the coming years by 3-4% in real terms after being adjusted for inflation.  Why?  In the face of the widespread decay and destruction our wars have caused here in our own nation, how can we continue on this course of literal self destruction?

    Comments

    But we have to be at war! Always! Because, um... of jobs! Weapons jobs! And also you never know when those British will be back. They never got over what happened back in the 18th century you know.


    Hmmmmm so let's see. Killing people (the primary job of the military), good? Saving people (the primary role of affordable health care), bad. Huh, I see, killing good, preserving life bad.

    I guess it is all about priorities. And societal priorities often are a good indicator of the moral health of a people, or the degree of decay of them and their society.

    I seriously wish I knew what the founders, regardless of their ideology, would feel about this development in their experiment of theirs in freedom, justice and democracy.

    Most of them never envisioned an America with a standing army, never mind what we ended up having in terms of our current all consuming military.


    It's strange to see that old Streamline Moderne building fourth from the bottom on your array, from 1935 maybe, a survivor of the last Great Depression, waiting around so many years for the next big crash.

    Thanks for posting this diary, oleeb. In 1935 almost everybody thought the future would look like space-ships, but it looks like broken dreams instead.


    Make War = Make Money

    Any Questions?


    People got ready, but the train ain't coming..


    A minor quibble with the headline: the HCR bill is not going to reduce costs. It's a political trickery to allow fiscally conservative Blue Dogs to flip to "yes".

    As for the substance of the post, the Founding Fathers warned about entangling alliances other than foreign trade - and boy, were they right.


    Point well taken. However, I would revise your formula thusly:

    Make War = Make Money for merchants of death


    I like the following formula better:

    Make peace=make MORE money for everyone




    I thought about make peace for a bit but then it occurred to me that using peoples fear is a more sure fire way to separate them from their money. And the more money you have the greater that fear. Thus we have congress, a group of people with more money than most, running scared all he time that someone will take it from them. Bunch of chickenshits.


    If want to understand how this has happened, read Andrew Bacevich's "The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War." Succinct and to the point and written by a retired U.S. Army officer to boot.


    Michael Franti's trailer for his film 'I Know I'm Not Alone.' He traveled to Iraq, Gaza/West Bank and Israel to check out the human cost of war.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?

    v=MnwqiDgYoRY&feature=related

    Video of 'I know i'm not alone.' (2 of 9)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNgKfTx7R-w&feature=related


    Moyers has had Bacevich on a couple times; he's a straight shooter, isn't he?
    The interviews are surely in the archives at his Journal.
    Yep:
    http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/about/search_google.html?q=andrew+bacevich


    Yes he is and is roundly disliked, therefore, by the right wingers.


    Latest Comments