MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
This year, nearly 200 nations convened in Paris to discuss the future of the planet. The issue at hand was climate change. With greenhouse gases pumped into the air by various forms of industry, the temperature of the Earth is rising, slowly but surely. The last five years are the hottest five-year span ever recorded, and this year the average temperature of the Earth is expected to reach 1 degree Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
COP21 set both a promise and a goal, signed off on by every country in attendance. The promise is to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels by 2100. The goal is 1.5 degrees. Under current policies, the Earth’s temperature is predicted to reach 3.6 degrees above those levels by 2100, and even the new policies established at COP21 would only limit warming to 2.7 degrees.
It’s clear that to meet this goal, countries around the world will have to make drastic changes in climate policies, and those changes must come as soon as possible. With transportation currently responsible for 27 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, the auto industry is likely to be the target of several new policies.
Emissions
The most direct way of reducing greenhouse gas is to place stricter emissions regulations on gas and diesel vehicles. These regulations are effectively a compromise. Reducing emissions usually comes at the cost of some amount of power and efficiency, so we may see a slightly decline in these across the board if tighter regulations are established.
While it would cost a not-insignificant amount of money, most car companies could reduce emissions without any radical design changes. Methods of controlling greenhouse gases are well-established, but emissions are not usually a customer priority, whereas power and efficiency often are. That means manufacturers also deprioritize limiting emissions. Taken to the extreme, this explains the recent Volkswagen scandal, where the company installed software that enable cars to cheat emissions tests in order to keep the additional performance that comes with disabling devices that control greenhouse gases.
Reducing emissions essentially boils down to making sure as much of the fuel as possible has combusted before the remaining molecules are expelled through the exhaust system. The ideal way to do this is by ensuring more efficient combustion in the cylinder, which also increases performance and fuel efficiency. Unfortunately, most manufacturers have explored this option to the extent that there is little headway to be made. Some radical cylinder head designs, however, could in theory slightly increase combustion efficiency.
Another way emissions can be reduced is by injecting exhaust gases back into the cylinder to give remaining hydrocarbons another chance to be broken up. This must process must be carefully controlled by computer, however. If too much oxygen is displaced by exhaust gases, combustion will not occur.
One of the more promising areas for improvement is the catalytic converter. This is the last line of defense for greenhouse gases, breaking down hydrocarbons through a passive chemical process. Catalytic converters are not 100 percent effective, and the design has remained largely unchanged for some time. Dedicated computer simulations could discover a more effective layout than the standard honeycomb pattern, although such a design would likely be more difficult to manufacture.
Catalytic converters also don’t operate well when cold. Some cars use electric heaters to bring the converter up to operating temperature quickly, which can significantly reduce emissions during the first few minutes of operation after a cold start. Adding this system to all cars would be an easy way to reduce overall emissions.
Fuel Efficiency
Unlike emissions, fuel efficiency has been a priority in the car industry for some time. The spike in gas prices a few years ago caused many customers to place fuel efficiency among their highest considerations when buying a new car, and the industry has responded to that demand. Even among performance cars, manufacturers are finding ways to squeeze out a few extra mpg. For example, the Ford Mustang’s new EcoBoost engine manages to put out more than 300 horsepower and more than 30 mpg, thanks to a creative turbocharged I-4 design.
Government requirements for fuel efficiency have already been a huge motivating factor for the industry, and the highest requirements will be rolled out in 2016, where manufacturers will be expected to meet an average of 37.8 mpg for cars and 28.8 mpg for trucks. Vehicles that go above and beyond these requirements provide credit that allows for less efficient ones, such as performance cars. Ford’s various sedans will have to significantly exceed that mark to accommodate the Mustang GT’s less efficient V8 engine.
Hybrid and Electric Vehicles
Many car manufacturers are already producing plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles. These cars can run without using gas at all, preventing the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. These efforts will likely be expanded in the future, especially if further overall fuel-efficiency requirements are put in place after 2016.
Another factor that could spur increased demand for electric cars is a carbon tax or cap-and-trade system like the one China recently put in place. The U.S. doesn’t currently tax carbon emissions, but with even oil companies like ExxonMobil recommending some form of carbon tax, that may change in the near future. Such a tax would slightly raise gas prices, but could also tax consumers directly for carbon emissions from their vehicles, creating additional incentive to look at alternative fuel options.
Without any new policies directly affecting the auto industry, it’s difficult to predict exactly how the commitment to climate change reform at COP21 will affect car manufacturers. However, past changes in environmental regulations can provide some picture of what might be to come. If the countries involved are serious about honoring this commitment, expect stricter emissions and fuel-efficiency requirements to come in 2016 and beyond.
Comments
Hi Holly, where did you come from? hahahahah
Sometimes capitalism works....Sun and Wind and ocean currents and just plain garbage serves as energy sources nowadays. Because such investments work!
Oil is so far down in per barrel value lately.
But, the beat goes on!
By the by I am in favor of some sort of energy tax.
Which means that Exxon and repubs will hate me forever. hahahahahah
http://www.cleanlineenergy.com/technology/wind-and-solar
We shall succeed.
HELL, we go to Europe and a hundred nations attempt to come to some conclusion.
We cannot come to some conclusion with 50 state reps chiming in.
by Richard Day on Wed, 01/13/2016 - 3:32pm
Thanks Holly. There are many ways to reduce vehicular GHG emissions. You have enumerated a few. Another obvious option is driving less through some combination of carpooling, walking, bicycling, increased reliance on public transportation, and living closer to one's place of work. I have argued, most recently here, on many occasions that the most efficient way to achieve increasing reductions is through the implementation of a very significant tax on all fossil fuels (FFT) that rises consistently over time. I'm interested in your thoughts.
by HSG on Wed, 01/13/2016 - 11:05pm
Thanks for posting, Holly.
by Oxy Mora on Wed, 01/13/2016 - 8:56pm
Thanks for the comments everyone, I'm new here so hello! *waves enthusiastically*
I definitely agree, I'd like to see a bigger increase in focus worldwide on renewable energy sources and alternatives for cutting down on oil use. Hal, as you mentioned, I think carpooling is a great idea. Often the case in many states (outside of the major cities) is that public transportation is limited and folks have to travel a significant distance to get to work for one reason or the other (living closer may not be an option if a couple or family work in geographically distant locations). I feel that an increase in taxes on fossil fuels would only be detrimental for those who live and work in areas like this, where alternatives are not readily available. Having grown up and lived most of my life in London, I've seen the first-hand impact of the congestion charges and what these can do for lessening emissions in a major city. I don't think it's gone far enough but it's a start. I'd like to see a switch to more electric or hybrid vehicles for buses and taxis next, making the inevitable vehicle movement in major areas more eco-friendly.
Thanks again for your comments!
by hollywhitman on Thu, 01/14/2016 - 9:09am
You're welcome. It was a pleasure to read such a disciplined post.
My progeny drive Prius's. Not me. I live in Texas where dualies rule the road---and Im not going to put myself in danger by driving an itty bitty car. I'll buy an Escalade and drive less.
In California where I have a business which employs about 10 people, new emissions requirements forced me to remove old trucks and buy new ones. While I am philosophically in tune with the concept, the economic effect is adverse.
And what to do with the old trucks. I think I'll sell them to some Socialists who are planning a distribution business.
by Oxy Mora on Thu, 01/14/2016 - 10:06am
I'm sure this post was meant to be informative but the second paragraph and the claims that auto emissions controls reduce greenhouse gasses is confused and just wrong. Emissions controls reduce hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, NOx emissions and other harmful pollutants but they only increase the emissions of carbon dioxide the main greenhouse gas. The catalytic converter produces CO2 and water from these other pollutants.
There is no known/practical method to remove CO2 from vehicle exhaust, it can only be reduced by burning less fuel (efficiency). Maximum possible fuel efficiency has or will soon be reached for internal combustion engines so other means of meeting stricter fuel economy standards are being employed including smaller engines, such as Ford's EcoBoost and Chrysler's EcoDiesel, smaller cars and the most promising improvement, lighter vehicles. Ford's new F150 is built of aluminum so its less efficient engines can compete with the more efficient Chrysler and GM trucks.
by Peter (not verified) on Thu, 01/14/2016 - 11:38am