oleeb's picture

    It Was Tragic But Did Not "Change Everything" At All

    The morning of the heinous attacks on New York and Washington I was struck by many things, but beyond the horror of the carnage, what really leapt out at me as I was watching CNN (like everyone else I jumped around all day watching first one station then another) was historian David McCullough announcing earnestly and with great authority that the meaning of the attack was that we would "have to" surrender some of our liberty as a result.  I thought then, and have never changed my thinking on this that such a statement was bullshit.

    Why on earth would this mean I or any American would have to surrender any liberty whatsoever?  Yes, it was a terrible attack by terrorists but it was not by any means an existential threat to the USA nor did it hold the potential for being so.  The very idea of surrendering one shred of the liberty given to us by our Creator was and remains anathema to me. 

    After McCullough had his say other somber and oh so serious luminaries began a parade of consensus about how we would now have to be prepared to be essentially less free than we were that morning.  I distincly recall thinking to myself that this line of thinking seems almost choreographed, planned, canned... pre-cooked if you will.  They were spouting this hooey on every channel!  I found this thinking not only offensive but cowardly.  I still do.  I also thought these opinions coming from our betters in the chattering classes went along nicely with Bush's cowardice that day.  And yes, I interpreted his going into hiding that day as cowardice and still do.  I also considered the behavior of our congressional leadership that day cowardly as so many of them disappeared in fear into government shelters or bunkers and so on.

    I'm a midwesterner who spent a substantial portion of my early adult life in the northeast and it definitely crossed my mind that all these luminaries, government leaders, talking heads, "journalists", rich people, etc... wouldn't be half as concerned if this happened in Omaha or Witchita or Topeka.  Call me cynical but I think the ruling class was a helluva lot more upset about this because they personally felt threatened.  They certainly didn't freak out over Oklahoma City now did they? 

    I honestly don't mean to diminish the real and genuine concerns that existed, but the near panic I found among our elite, even under these horrifying circumstances, unbecoming and not very inspiring to say the least.  It was clear Bin Laden had succeeded in scaring them.  Far from being inspirational that night in his speech, Bush looked like a deer caught in the headlights after a day of hiding out.  I found him lacking in the extreme on that day all around. 

    I certainly wasn't scared.  Nobody I knew outside of the two cities under attack felt scared.  But I understood why the people in the two cities that were attacked felt as they did.  You'd have to have had a heart of stone not to empathize and feel deeply the trauma experienced by New Yorkers and DC area residents that day. 

    I had a friend who slept at a hotel at the World Trade Center the night before on a business trip.  He left for JFK early that morning and so was actually on the plane getting ready for takeoff when the attacks occurred.  They could see the smoke and fire, but had no idea what was happening for some time.  I had an old friend who lives in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn who I e-mailed.  He was very somber, his wife literally sick with grief and horror, his children confused.  A dear friend of mine lived in DC and I got in touch with her the moment I heard the Pentagon had been attacked and while she was fine, she was extremely upset as she had friends who worked in both the pentagon and the twin towers.  We talked and watched tv together long distance.  As one of the towers collapsed she was sobbing and I'll never forget her whispering through her tears "all those people".  I was still on the phone with her and we were watching NBC as both towers were now gone they had a camera in a helicopter overlooking the entire southern portion of Manahttan Island and it was then that I saw the most jarring image of that day for me.  The monsterous cloud of smoke and ash and debris billowing out from the site literally enveloped the entire southern tip of Manhattan.  Everything was obscured. You couldn't see anything of the thousands of giant buildings.  There was only smoke expanding and suffocating magnicifcent New York.  I had been there many, many times over the years and know the area very well.  To see the whole Island disappear gave me a sick feeling in my stomach.  It's something etched in my memory.  I remember my friend just kept repeating softly "horrible, horrible... horrible."

    It was tragic.  It was a crime of unprecedented proportions, but despite the spectacular nature of the attack and gruesome toll of that day I still refuse to accept that anything took place that day that should "change everything".  Frankly, I find that an absurd over reaction, but sadly one that we allowed to consume our country's governmental policies and we are now clearly seeing the negative effects of that over reaction in many, many ways.  I must re-emphasize that beyond the inconveniences at the airport when traveling and afew other minor annoyances, little or nothing has changed for the average American except the name of "the enemy" that now finally filled the blank space that used to be filled by the words "Soviet Union."  It has seemed all very Orwellian to me the entire time.

    Remember please that even then the US spent nearly unimaginable sums more for our military than any other country on earth and more than most countries on earth combined and it didn't do a damn thing to keep us safe on the only day in my life when it really counted and I'm over 50 years old.  We didn't even get a coherent excuse for why not a single one of our mult-million dollar jet fighters was put in the air until it was too late to actually do anything about the planes headed for the twin towers and the pentagon!  Trillions were spent and always on the foundation of never allowing another Pearl Harbor and whamo a sneak attack succeeded just like that.  They knew for over an hour that all those planes had been hijacked and our gold plated military was as usuless as tits on a bull as my grandpa used to say.

    The obssessive compulsive and inexcusable increase in military spending since that day 9 years ago is an embarassing, absurd, and immoral sum considering the vast and critical human needs that exist in our country.  But it was "necessary" to throw money at the problem of terrorism since 9/11 "changed everything."  The two wars the government used the 9/11 attacks to justify were not only not what needed to be done but were ill conceived and mismanaged from the start.  I hasten to add the military was not responsible for the mismanagement and the ill conceived wars but the Bush administration was fully responsible for the debacle they spawned in both Afghanistan and Iraq.  And other than deaths of tens of thousands of soldiers and civilians, grotesque amounts of borrowed money spent on unwinnable and pointless wars and a national security state all of which are weakening our economy what have the people of the US gotten out of all of that?  Precious little, if anything at all.  What's for damn sure is that we haven't gotten any safer because of it all and actually there have been a couple of reports out of the Pentagon that have said we are now less safe particularly as a result of the two wars that have no end in sight.

    What have we lost by the ill conceived and costly reaction our scared leaders had to the 9/11 attacks?  We've lost a great deal.  Yes, some of our liberty is lost but we have, in large part, lost our Constitutional government.  Both Bush and Obama have made and gotten away with making outrageous and illegitimate claims to authority clearly not granted to the President in the Constitution.  We have seen our government adopt illegal politicies of torture, kidnapping, senseless and unjustified and indefinite "detention" of "suspects" based upon little or no evidence.  We have seen our nation's reputation in the world heavily tarnished.  And we have also seen the rise of ignorant, bigoted citizens foaming at the mouth with hateful, irrational xenophobia and religious bigotry coupled with a mighty unhealthy dose of unmitigated racism.

    Everything looks the same and feels the same where I am today as it did prior to the day they used as an excuse to "change everything".  Yet our country is way off track, has officially surrendered some of our most sacred constitutional values and has begun to adopt more and more, policies always previously rejected by America because they were the tools of tyranny favored by despots. 

    I will never forget the horrible crime that occured that day, but I will also never forget that the idea that those attacks require me and my fellow citizens to surrender their liberrty or any of their birthright as Americans is a pernicious lie.  We could have long ago defeated and destroyed Al Qaeda, but the same people who ran our ship of state aground again and again during the Cold War are now back in charge with a vengeance.  They are implementing all the old programs and using all the old tactics deployed against our earlier boogey man "communism" and it isn't working this time either.  We cannot afford to let those interests remain in charge of this nation's policies whether in defense, intelligence or otherwise.  Right now they are calling the shots and that means nothing but trouble and continued disasterous military adventures abroad that bring nothing but trouble to our nation.

    Instead of being cowed by the propaganda and the maudlin, melodramatic rhetoric I encourage all my fellow citizens to remember how earlier generations of American reacted to adversity and that was with practical resolve, unyielding and fierce courage and never did those Americans who came before us operate out of fear.  Let us never forget the tragedy of 9/11, but lets also never forget that by surrendering any of our liberties or national character we will have allowed a tiny band of miscreants to command our fate.  The time has come when we need to put this tragic day in our history in proper and rational perspective and moved forward fearlessly and with resolve for the first time since that day.  We cannot afford to allow scared leaders to continue to pursue counterproductive policies of extreme violence all over the world and expect terrorism to go away.  That's the way to create more of it: not to defeat it.  Furthermore, the continued insanity in building up the military and police state is depriving the entire nation of critically important investments of all kind both human and otherwise. 

    Clearly, our ruling elite continue to be ruled by fear.  The people must reject that and demand that our policies demonstrate not only some backbone but some common sense and put this nation back on track.

    Comments

    Call me cynical but I think the ruling class was a helluva lot more upset about this because they personally felt threatened.

    Bingo!

    It's time to retire 9/11 to our "tragic memory archive". There are plenty of exhibits there, and it can take its place among the many. And we shut down the wars for which the tragedy was pretext. And we end the obscene, phony "war on terror".

    And... of course... we tell Israel to fight its own wars.

    Inasmuch as the poobahs of the East Coast wouldn't give a hoot if this happened in Wichita or Dooleyville, the rest of us out here aren't as deeply marked by 9/11 as we would be if the planes destroyed, say, the Capitol building or the White House. The WTD was 30 years old, and was an obsolete monument to an American era in which was born the curse of overweening Yankee ego. Delusions born in that time have brought us nothing but sorrow. Now... we are burdened by greedy incompetents at the top - just as self-obsessed but not as talented; they are unable to replace what once earned gasps as the tallest shoebox architecture in the world. This may not be a bad thing.


    I highly recommend this comment.

    C


    Oleeb, when this first happened I was horrified at the response of the Bush administration. They elevated these common thugs to some sort of State enemy. They were never that, but Bush, Cheney, et al made them that.

    If we had wanted to beat back Al Queada, we should have relied on law enforcement, not on our military.

    It's like using a chain saw to eradicate head lice. The treatment is far worse than the infestation.


    Very well put Curt! Very well put indeed!


    The cowardice displayed by our political leadership on that day was sickening IMHO (not to mention the incompetence). But what followed was perfectly in line with the sort of personalities we had in power. They were cowards, caught with their pants down on that day and so to overcompensate and make it appear that they were big, strong, tough guys they rolled out the war machine and started pounding their chests like they were bad asses when they were anything but. All of the trillions of dollars, the mass violence, the idiotic and malevolent "national security" spying apparatus they have put in place that only really spies on us and not our enemies, and all the rest is all to hide their shortcomings as leaders. The louder they scream and the harder they pound their chests the more likely people won't notice that they are scared shitless of that band of pathetic murderers and don't know what to do about them.

    The cowardly Democrats haven't helped matters by being even more scared of what the Republicans might say about them if they talked some sense than the Republicans were of Al Qaeda!


    Well put, Oleeb.

    It is long overdue for Americans to confront the mass stupidity and cowardice that followed the Sept. 11, '01 attacks. The way in which Hypocrite-Republicans trashed our country's reputation and national security was outrageous; the way Coward-Democrats supinely rubberstamped that lunacy was at least as outrageous. It disrespects the tragedy of the victims on that day to silently acquiesce in the tremendous scandal that has foisted itself upon their memory. The attacking suicide-terrorists of 9 years ago won a slight temporary victory amongst a few potential followers that was soon outweighed by the outpouring of international sympathy and support for the US, which, however, was in turn outweighed by the dismay at how that sympathy and support was wantonly squandered -by Cheney-Bush, blank-checked to a lesser or greater degree by most Congressional Democrats. The temporary gain to Al Qaeda of Sept 11, 2001 was puny compared to the loss America inflicted upon itself in response. It is high time to stop pretending otherwise. The official reaction to 9-11 ranks -with the reaction to the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the Salem Witch craze and the Red Scare of 1919- among the great mass unhingings of our history.


    The attacking suicide-terrorists of 9 years ago won a slight temporary victory amongst a few potential followers... I would say the purveyors of empire gained a 'temporary victory'.

    ..the outpouring of international sympathy and support for the US was soon exploited to justify the execution of aggressive war, with the invasions of not only Afghanistan, but also Iraq. The anthrax attacks also helped scare the country into invading Iraq, and were, like 9/11, blamed on the dead.

    In the Amerithrax case, one man with no motive to release spores, allegedly did so at a convenient time for the war promoters, two weeks after 9/11, and of course with a note implicating Muslims.

    Count me as an official story skeptic and a believer that there are people who planned and benefited from these attacks who were still alive afterward, people who are not talking, and will likely never talk, or face justice.


    "I'm a midwesterner who spent a substantial portion of my early adult life in the northeast and it definitely crossed my mind that all these luminaries, government leaders, talking heads, "journalists", rich people, etc... wouldn't be half as concerned if this happened in Omaha or Witchita or Topeka. Call me cynical but I think the ruling class was a helluva lot more upset about this because they personally felt threatened."

    Yes, and we've seen how they came to terms with their personal feelings of insecurity. They deployed the National Guard from Omaha, Wichita and Topeka and then they went back to making money and sending their kids to private schools while kids from the midwest fight the wars.

    The midwest didn't lose many on 9/11 but we sure have since and their names aren't on any monument and no one gives a damn that they continue to die.


    And at least we on the right side of the Cafe page are at least talking about 9/11 and war instead of some inside baseball university spat.


    Great post!

    Instead of being cowed by the propaganda and the maudlin, melodramatic rhetoric I encourage all my fellow citizens to remember how earlier generations of American reacted to adversity and that was with practical resolve, unyielding and fierce courage and never did those Americans who came before us operate out of fear.

    Not just earlier generations. Don't forget Flight 93 and "let's roll". I get a chill and tear up whenever I remember them.


    Please, please, Oleeb, forgive me for being blunt. I feel like I'm drowning in words lately, both my own and everyone else's.
    My brother: you often need an editor to help you trim down your posts! I often find my mind wandering, and want to start slashing words with my red pen.

    But this, IMO, is your best post ever. You cut to the core of so many of the 9-11 mythology, and spoke not only to the fear of the populace that was ginned up by politicians and media alike, but allude to the need for a new and perpetual enemy the masters of war and empire could construct.

    I was going to add that the American public turning against the war(s) might be the only way they end, but two things make me hesitant to advance that argument. One is the polling on extending tax cuts for the top 2% will be dismissed, and also that the polls I just googled were all over the map, as they can be if pollsters are out to prove a trend.

    One last thing comes to my mind when I see all the tattered yellow ribbons and war support signs in this valley, and that's that I think lots of Americans really do want to re-create some unified feeling in winning wars as the 'Greatest Generation' did. I know that many people speak to the attempts to bury the dismal failure in Viet Nam as some amorphous pretext for supporting these wars, but I sometimes think its even more than that. I can't think what to call the underlying need at play, but it's the same sort of base instinct that causes people to yell, "Bring it on!" or "We're number one!" or to believe that killing some nefarious, if elusive, enemy, will make them feel superior, if not secure.

    Sorry to prattle on so, after having declared a war on words! Wow; how ironic...

    But good job, Oleeb. This kinda made my day.
    ;o)


    Thanks Wendy. Yes, I probably could use an editor more often than not. On this particular post I just sat down and quickly banged it out because I didn't know if I'd actually be able to post it if I took too long given the odd, lingering situation with reader blogs here. It was almost stream of consciousness, but I've thought about this subject a whole lot over time so it just came rolling out. I'm very glad it was well met.


    Thank you and xcellent point about Flight 93.


    Oh c'mon. The WWI generation locked up all of the Japanese-Americans in concentration camps. During the first decades of the 20th century, the country was seized by a "red scare" which produced massive infringements of liberty . It's one thing to point out the cowardly and ignorant response to 9/11; it's another to romantically idealize the Americans of previous generations.


    Just a couple of thought on the post-9/11 climate.

    When the towers collapsed, as I recall, initial estimates where that 20 to 30 thousand people had been killed. It took several days, perhaps weeks, before the substantially lower correct figure was established.

    As has already been mentioned, the inexcusably repressed and forgotten anthrax mailing played a very significant role in promoting the climate of fear and hysteria that followed 9/11. The anthrax mailings targeted liberal US Senators and the offices and personalities of the major East Coast media.

    It still shocks me that once it became clear the anthrax was not sent by jihadists, but was an inside job, the American people did not demand an all out, fully-resourced and highest priority investigation of the attack, and that even to this day we do not have a definitive resolution of the case. You almost get the impression a whole lot of people just don't want to know who did it, or don't want other to think about who did it. You would think that at least the reporters whose lives, and whose staff's lives, were deliberately targeted by a mass murderer would never rest until they had figured out who targeted them. But no.


    I think there's an important distinction here and that is when real danger is present.

    The Palmer Raids were manufactured hysteria over nothing at all except the anger of certain elements in the government at dissenters. They created a boogey man as an excuse to violate the rights of people. But there was no fear of the Kaiser or his allies. The victims of the Palmer raids were the same people who were pre-war trying to organize the factories and shops and railroad yards all over the country. There was no threat at all per se, just a ginned up pack of lies about disloyalty and subversion.

    The interment of the Japanese during WWII was (shamefully) not all that big a deal at the time which is a sad and disgraceful commentary on how racist and xenophobic we were at that time. But fear of Japanese in any way analagous to the fear of a communist under your bed during the Cold War or terrorism now? I dont think there was any at all in World War II. The government was suspicious of the loyalty of Japanese Americans and contrary to all decency and common sense just rounded up all of them just to "make sure". Our overtly racist nation just went along with it.

    What we saw from both the government and the people during those two wars were anger and a resolve to defeat the enemy... that attacked us but certainly not out of a fear they might do it again. Quite the contrary. From day one when the US entered the war FDR's statement in his request for a declaration of war set the tone.

    FDR calmly and carefully laid out what the Japanese had done in the pacific on December 7th and 8th and somberly noted that despite our efforts to avoid this eventuality "a state of war exists" between the US and the Japanese Empire. He concluded the address with these words:

    "The American people, in their righteous might, will win through to absolute victory."



    I agree with you that it does appear that way. You also have the factor of covering up embarassing facts and incompetence. This factor played a huge role in the JFK assassination vastly complicating the entire matter and causing a huge lack of credibility for the government. We don't have all the facts here certainly, but we do know of the massive, concerted and determined effort of Bush and Cheney to make sure nobody would ever find out what the facts were. My best guess is because their actions and those of any number of highly placed people in the chain of command in the midst of crisis was so stunningly incompetent and embarassing, but there's no way to be certain unless and until a full and honest accounting is made of what happened. The 9/11 Commission was a joke and didn't even come close to fulfilling this responsibility.


    Thank you Oleeb. This was too well written for me to offer anything of value to it.


    Dan K said: It's one thing to point out the cowardly and ignorant response to 9/11; it's another to romantically idealize the Americans of previous generations.

    I am reasonably sure you were responding to my excerpt of oleeb but since it showed up as a reply to my comment...

    When have people not done both? It is how socially-acceptable responses to possible future events are taught.

    I despise how the Bush Administration used 9/11 but I fail to see how that diminishes what happened on Flight 93. People facing almost certain death sucking it up and trying to do something to stop it. Maybe that's romantic but it is also admirable.


    You would think that at least the reporters whose lives, and whose staff's lives, were deliberately targeted by a mass murderer would never rest until they had figured out who targeted them.

    How do we know they don't already know. Intimidation is usually very effective.


    agree with you completely, Oleeb.. the only revision I could make to this well-written piece is to change..."Clearly, our ruling elite continue to be ruled by fear." to "Clearly, our ruling elite continue to rule by fear."


    They use fear to sell every program they have now, and Obama is especially guilty of that. The first thing he did was tell us we needed more money for education or "the economy wouldn't recover". We had to pass the cap and trade bill to create green jobs or "the economy wouldn't recover". We're just sick of being told what to be afraid of. This is what passes for leadership in America today.


    My objection was to the blanket characterization of "how earlier generations of Americans acted to adversity". It's just a mistake to suggest that those earlier generations were less disposed toward paranoia, fear-mongering and curtailment of liberties than the present generation.

    It's always been a battle to preserve sanity and constitutional liberties in America, a battle which has been lost several times before, as was documented by the historian Richard Hofstadter in his essay, "The Paranoid Style in American Politics". What's happening in this generation is nothing new.


    Really? I dont' think so; I think Curt's comment represents precisely the kind of hate on the so-called left that helps to preserve the power of the ruling class you refer to. Indeed, I see the same kind of ignorance, polished but ignorant nonetheless, in Curt's focus on Israel, this historically consistent trope and hateful statement that we, the non-Jews, are fighting Israel's wars, and the same stereotyping and disregard of the great diversity among 1.5 billion Muslims in presuming that Israel is the key to everything, that we see in the extreme Tea Partiers on the other side. At the threshold it utterly ignores that Osama bin Laden never mentioned Israel as the basis for 9/11 or for the actions taken by al Qaeda before 9/11. Now he does I suppose, but that's because it sells to folks, even in the West. Yes, indeed, Jew hatred sells. Wow, how fucking profound. It's just the same hatred we've always seen, and it's often been polished.

    Honestly, if the Cafe doesn't come back, the incessant focus on Israel and controlling Jews is something I will not miss. It disgusts me, and it should disgust people who claim to care about truth and justice too.

    And, finally, to disregard the significance of the Towers falling as an American tragedy of monumental and eternal significance is just dumb as well as hurtful. Three thousand people were killed in that fucking "shoebox." And to claim that the focus on the Towers is significant relative to an alleged lack of focus on Oklahoma City is just that much nonsense, and I say that with respect Oleeb to you because I know you were trying to make a bigger point.

    In the end, people wonder why the so-called left is left to kvetch at places like this, while others do the job of fucking up the country. I don't.


    Some of these scares might not have been the work random sickos, but of organized provocateurs seeking to take advantage of the climate of fear aroused by 9/11, intensify it, and use it to promote a political agenda.




    Wow ... Hey BSLev ...

    Someone piss in your coffee or crap in your cream of wheat this morning?

    You sound so god damn shrill and ridiculous laying a bunch of bullshit at the feet of "the so-called left."

    ...to disregard the significance of the Towers falling as an American tragedy of monumental and eternal significance is just dumb as well as hurtful. Three thousand people were killed in that fucking "shoebox."

    The following two sections ARE the heart of the matter:

    I honestly don't mean to diminish the real and genuine concerns that existed, but the near panic I found among our elite, even under these horrifying circumstances, unbecoming and not very inspiring to say the least. It was clear Bin Laden had succeeded in scaring them. Far from being inspirational that night in his speech, Bush looked like a deer caught in the headlights after a day of hiding out. I found him lacking in the extreme on that day all around.
    It was tragic. It was a crime of unprecedented proportions, but despite the spectacular nature of the attack and gruesome toll of that day I still refuse to accept that anything took place that day that should "change everything". Frankly, I find that an absurd over reaction, but sadly one that we allowed to consume our country's governmental policies and we are now clearly seeing the negative effects of that over reaction in many, many ways. I must re-emphasize that beyond the inconveniences at the airport when traveling and a few other minor annoyances, little or nothing has changed for the average American except the name of "the enemy" that now finally filled the blank space that used to be filled by the words "Soviet Union." It has seemed all very Orwellian to me the entire time.

    Now BSlev ... go stuff a fucking sock in it!

    ~OGD~


    Successfully executed and covered-up transnational conspiracies are much less common than sheer coincidence, and both are much less probable than good old-fashioned butter-fingered stupidity.

    The evidence that the president had specific advance knowledge is much stronger (though still a far cry from a "smoking gun") in the case of Pearl Harbor, but both disasters are much more replete with well-documented incompetence and blunders on the part of senior federal officials.

    In any case, who in officialdom knew what beforehand, or -not-knowing- acted like an idiot for no good reason anyway, is a completely different question from that at issue here: how the country as whole reacted afterwards.


    Stating facts, however unpleasant, is a far cry from fear-mongering. Fear mongering is fight them over there so we don't have to fight them over here, or Sharia law is already practiced in some counties in the United States, or Victory Mosque.

    Your false equivalence smacks of partisan doublespeak.

    The only ones seemingly "afraid" of paying teachers or creating energy systems for the future, are the wealthy, who begrudge the American people even a meager existence and a hope for the future of their children and their country.


    OGD:

    I know you are part of the "in" set in this place. one of the "othering" gang. Good for you. But I've had lots of dialogue here over the years with people from all different perspectives, and I am proud of the level of discourse I have sought to uphold, repeatedly around here, and I've done so without much contact with you.

    I stand by what I wrote. To reiterate, If Josh decides to pull the plug, one thing I won't miss is the incessant ignorant focus on Israel and the Jews in control. Deal with it and stick it where you may.


    That too.


    And while you're at it, go fuck yourself. I was addressing Curt and wrote just that to oleeb, i.e. I was referring to the "shoebox" reference and mentioned that to oleeb and wrote that I understood he was making a larger point.

    Now I'm sorry I caused you to have an incredible hissy fit last week with what was a joke that I made to clearthinker on your thread; I'm sorry you responded like a little crying baby, such that you pulled the ultimate childish prank and disabled your comments. But really, go fuck yourself; we've never dialogued and there is no reason to start now. I promise if this place comes back I'll write nothing to you--do me a favor and make me the same promise. This is not your dime.


    Well, it worked for me! And many others as well, it seems.
    Maybe you've found your way toward Art in your posts.
    ;o)


    What's new is the absence of leadership. Where's the noblesse oblige? George Bush, Sr. went to war with his generation. Sure, we've always had class differences in this country but have we ever been this proud to have them?


    Well we'll just have to disagree on this one a bit Bruce. Nobody said the September 11th attacks weren't of huge significance. The point is not to downplay that but to say despite their significance the whole line of thinking that everything changed was and remains an absurd over reaction. Clearly, anyone with eyes can see that everything has not changed. In fact, very little has changed for the common American in their daily life. What has happened is that the war machine has used 9/11 as an excuse to expropriate even more money, manpower and everything else to inflate the importance and power of "the enemy" so it can do it's thing which neither protects us nor has done any good in wiping out Al Qaeda. We have lost a great deal here in order to make this massive committment to a truly global program of mass violence that continues terrorizing tens of millions of innocent people in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and perhaps elesewhere. The mythical "war on terror" is a massive failure in all it's publicly stated objectives. There's simply no way around that conclusion as far as I can tell yet every single message you and I send via the internet and all our telephonic communications are monitored by the government, the executive branch claims the power to decalre citizens terrorists by fiat and have them murdered anywhere on the globe without the slightest wiff of constitutional authority or judicial review, torture of prisoners continues, kidnappings and illegal indefinite detentions continue and more. They got away with all of this by claiming that we had to become more like a totalitarian police state and a thuggish imperial power to be safe here at home when the Pentagon's own studies have decalred that the wars have exactly the opposite effect by creating more bitterness and hatred of the west and America specifically throughout the muslim world (which only stands to reason) and thus we are less safe. Almost all of their domestic spying program is performed on perfectly innocent, ordinary Americans. I think the latest study to show that the FBI routinely abuses it's anti-terror powers under the mislabeled Patriot Act was from the GAO. The list goes on and on. None of these actions was justified by the heinous criminal acts of September 11, 2001.


    OGD, the content of your comment is fine, but there's really no need to be personally disagreeable to Bruce while disagreeing with him. He's got strong feelings about the subject and has a right to have his say. I have a different take on this than he does, but he's a good egg.


    oleeb,

    I don't disagree with you about abuses of power by the federal government since 9/11, and I consider it an imperative that we continue to jealously guard our civil liberties. 9/11 is not a pretext for unfettered violations of our privacy.

    That's not what I'm responding to. My response, and the emotion I express and which I make absolutely no apologies for, is the comment you were lauding, which I submit represents the oldest bigotry known to "western civilization." And that's not a minor point from where I sit, and I don't believe that anyone who harbors the kinds of presumptions about Israel and all that is implicit behind the reference to Israel's wars is not a member of any real left, but is really just a member of the "so-called left."

    And I'm sorry if I caused your thread to go off-track. You and I have had many discussions over the years that I'm proud of, and I would appreciate the opportunity to have many more.

    Bruce


    I think it's valid to point out that it's not an "either/or" reality in the past in terms of how Americans reacted to adversity. It is always a mixed bag and there are always exceptions to the rule. Yes, certainly there are always those instances of paranoid over reaction, etc... as you mention. But, there is also with that a reaction by most people and the leadership in the past that can be characterized as I did above. Perhaps the biggest single difference between the American response to 9/11 and adversity faced in the past was the astoundingly low quality of our leaders who were genuinely terrified and didn't respond wisely. I guess that's a more specific way to put it.


    There really isn't any need to defend me Oleeb. People can draw their own conclusions about what I write, even when I choose not to stay between the lines. But I am sorry because I've disrupted your thread.


    And see, the response you provoked from Bruce is the first time I've seen him respond like that... at least that I can think of. I'm not looking for a fight with you. I'm just sayin if we can excise that personal edge, we don't start devolving down the road to just personal attacks.


    No sweat Bruce.

    BTW, Happy New Year buddy! I hope your holiday was a good one.


    Jesus! I can't believe you obeyed and stayed. Had I been in Manhattan that day I sure would have hauled my ass out of the office and back home. The first few hours must have been a Godawful nightmare for you. I don't envy your experience at all. Why, I wonder, would they keep you on the job considering what had gone on? Had it been a hurricane everyone would have been allowed to leave wouldn't they?


    Hard to see how pointing out the consequences of a failure to act the economy will suffer is equivalent to telling people that if they don't surrender their liberty a terrorist will kill them, their families and/or their countrymen. If the former is using fear to push a policy through then it is a form of fear that isn't analagous to what our government has done in response to 9/11 as far as I'm concerned. I think it's apples and oranges.


    Thanks for writing this piece, oleeb.

    As a New Yorker, I experienced (and still experience) the cowardice and opportunism you speak of as a denigration of the importance of what had happened.

    The elements that really did change have been buried and have become difficult to locate in the debris.




    Now now now ... Bruise Easily. . .

    Oh my my my ... It's the worn trope "Go fuck yourself" ... Eh? Pffft...

    I know you are part of the "in" set in this place. one of the "othering" gang.

    You don't know shit from shinola nor your ass from your elbow if you really believe that I'm part of the "in" set...

    And that leads me to believe that you presume I agree with Curt's bullshit too. But, you'd be totally out to lunch once again.

    See, you'd be really surprised how you and I are very similar in background. Other than the age difference, and that you're there in the city and I'm 2460 miles to the west. Like you, I'm a crotchety son of a bitch and a 30 year ex-union steward and negotiator. Although only married once for 42 years, she's a special ed teacher for 40 years and can put up with anything...

    So if you don't like any of this you can just jam that sock further down your piehole...

    Makes not a bit of difference to me what you think.

    ~OGD~


    'The elements that really did change have been buried and have become difficult to locate in the debris.'

    Pure poetry, moat; it went right to the bones inside my body. Thank you for the metaphor.


    This is the best commentary on 9/11 I have read.

    Well done Oleeb, captures my own thoughts well.

    The media seems to sorely lack peopole of real world experience. Because of the use of lie detectors (fear of someone lying to them that they can't detect is lying-end result is either goody two shoes or pathological liars that manipulate the goody two shoes) in hiring for any sensitive positions both within federal government and out, we have folks who have not tasted the real world outside the confines of their suburbia and TVs.

    Combine them with the insulated moneyed elite running the media, we get zero leadership.

    Boy am I glad I live in West Virginia where I have the best chance of making it through the inevitables.


    ok


    Well 9/11 was 'uncommon'. For anyone who hasn't read it, the interview with former top German government Minister, Andreas Von Buelow from 2002:

    ...Are the explanations plausible? This time, this is not the case at all.....There are 26 intelligence services in the U.S.A. with a budget of $30 billion.....which were not able to prevent the attacks. In fact, they didn't even have an inkling they would happen. For 60 decisive minutes, the military and intelligence agencies let the fighter planes stay on the ground, 48 hours later, however, the FBI presented a list of suicide attackers. Within ten days, it emerged that seven of them were still alive...Atta and..assailants who, in their preparations, leave tracks behind them like a herd of stampeding elephants? They made payments with credit cards with their own names; they reported to their flight instructors with their own names. They left behind rented cars with flight manuals in Arabic for jumbo jets.......Clues were left like behind like in a child's game of hide-and-seek, which were to be followed!...With the help of the horrifying attacks, the Western mass democracies were subjected to brainwashing. The enemy image of anti-communism doesn't work any more; it is to be replaced by peoples of Islamic belief....

    Former German Minister rejects theory of 9/11 attacks link




    Yup . . .

    ~OGD~


    Saw this on Raw Story just now, Oleeb. Thought you might want to blog it:

    http://rawstory.com/news/afp/Thousands_held_without_trial_in_Ira_09132010.html

    A new Amnesty Intl. report on abuse of prisoners in Iraq and no trials for loads of them.

    How's it working out so far in Iraq?


    I have posted this before to the sound of crickets, but apparently folks in the Bush White House were put on anti-anthrax CIPRO starting the day of and just after the 9/11 attacks.

    The first anthrax letter was not mailed until two weeks later.

    I have never seen an official confirmation or explanation on this, though the Judicial Watch page on the matter is still on the internet:

    http://www.judicialwatch.org/1967.shtml

    The interview I link above from a German language interview of a former German gov't official is worth a read, he describes his sincere skepticism of the official story on the WTC attacks, which were 'solved' and pinned on swarthy suspects (all dead) within a mere 48 hours.


    Latest Comments