MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation 150 Years ago on January 1, 1863. As noted by historian Harold Holzer in an article at the Daily Beast, 4 million African-American slaves and thousands of white abolitionists awaited word of the signing of the document. The signing was delayed by a New Year’s party held in the White House was attended by the diplomatic corps, military elite and members of Congress. When the official party was over, White House guards opened the doors to allow several thousand members of the general public join in the revelry.
Waiting for the signing were several anti-slavery activists who had been praying in Northern churches since midnight on New Year’s Eve. Many wondered if the delay meant that Lincoln would renege on the promise made in the preliminary proclamation of September 22, 1862 that if Confederate States did not return to the Union within 100 days, their slaves would be considered forever free.
Pro-slavery advocates and newspapers in the United States and in Europe derided Lincoln for fomenting “servile insurrection,” abandoning his “constitutional moorings,” and threatening the American social order. The stock market went into decline after the preliminary proclamation. Army desertions rose and enlistment fell. Many wondered if Lincoln had the backbone to actually sign the official proclamation.
Lincoln had recently assured a delegation of Union men from his native Kentucky, “he would rather die than take back a word of the Proclamation of Freedom.” By Christmas, abolitionist Senator Charles Sumner was convinced that the president “would not stop the Proclamation if he could, and could not if he would.”
From the Holzer article
Lincoln had not intended to make America’s freedom community wait those tense extra hours while he attended his annual holiday reception. A typographical error made him do it. Earlier that day, the president had unrolled and meticulously proofread the official copy of the final proclamation, as painstakingly “engrossed” on a vellum scroll by a professional scribe. Unfortunately, a dismayed Lincoln spotted a tiny error within the boilerplate language at the bottom of this initial copy—the “hereunto set his hand” phrase had been mistakenly transcribed as “set his name.” Insisting that the document must be absolutely perfect because it would be so closely scrutinized, he ordered that the scribe create a new version—holiday notwithstanding. Not until mid-afternoon was the revised scroll finally ready. As soon as the annual reception ended, Lincoln quickly headed from the East Room upstairs to his private office, where he commenced patiently inspecting it. This time, he found no mistakes at all. But another delay—albeit a brief one—would now follow.
Lincoln had been shaking hands since the morning and found his hands so weak and numb that his handwriting would have appeared erratic and suggest hesitation if he signed the bill at the time. He massaged his hands to regain strength. When sensation returned, Abraham placed the now famous signature on the bill saying,: “That will do”.
The argument about whether the Proclamation did anything than serve as a mechanism to keep England from recognizing the Confederacy has been raging since the signing others feel that 50,000 slaves mostly along the Carolina coast immediately gained there freedom. The Emancipation Proclamation can be viewed as the first step in the decision by the government to end slavery in the United States. Union troops encountered thousands of slaves yearning to be free as they moved through the South. After initial reluctance to arbor the newly freed slaves, the decision was made to actually carry out the measure called for in the Proclamation. The property owned by Jefferson Davis was used as a safe harbor for his former slaves when Grant began attacking the nearby town of Vicks burg.
In its own time, Union charity organizer Mary Livermore called it “the sheet anchor of hope, the rainbow of promise, to the oppressed of every land, at home and abroad.” Harriet Beecher Stowe, whose novel Uncle Tom’s Cabin had galvanized Northern opposition to slavery, likened Lincoln to “Moses leading his Israel through the wilderness.” And America’s freedom poet John Greenleaf Whittier suggested that Lincoln’s document, once considered banal, had been divinely inspired: “The mighty word / He spake was not his own; / An impulse from the Highest stirred / These chiseled lips alone.”
The Proclamation only addressed slavery in Confederate states. Slave states that remained in the Union like Delaware, were unaffected by the law. Black troop recruitment increased after the Proclamation.
Just as the Declaration of Independence did not free the colonists, the Emancipation Proclamation did not free the slaves. Both documents wound up beginning the process of freedom. For African-Americans official freedom came in the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.
Happy 2013. the sesquicentennial of the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation.
Comments
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed"
by Resistance on Tue, 01/01/2013 - 12:06pm
by trkingmomoe on Tue, 01/01/2013 - 12:07pm
There's a good website Civil War Emancipation that focuses on the emancipation aspects of the Civil War. Today's page links to a NYT article by Eric Foner.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 01/01/2013 - 1:43pm
FYI, Tennessee was also exempt, as were states and many counties in Virginia and Louisiana. It was reminiscent of England in 1812 freeing slaves in US states even as slavery in English territories continued.
As the Emancipation Proclamation was only based on war powers, it wasn't until
A bit of a wait for post-war celebrations, but still an important step towards freedom.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 01/01/2013 - 1:27pm
Once again you seem to want to create argument out of nothing. I said states like Delaware. I specifically mentioned the 13th Amendment. Eric Foner also notes the date in a NYT Op-Ed today.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 01/01/2013 - 1:36pm
I typically don't follow links to the NYTimes. I just noted the dates, not an argument - pointing out the 3 years between the Emancipation Proclamation and full nationwide end of slavery. Most people don't realize - they think slaves were free at least by the end of the war, and don't realize citizenship came 3 years after the war.
Not worth noting?
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 01/01/2013 - 3:17pm
The limitations of the Emancipation Proclamation were noted by every link provided. The fact that several states were unaffected by the Proclamation were even noted by the National Archives as a part of the commemoration of the 150th anniversary.
The Foner post is worthy of read.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 01/01/2013 - 3:52pm
Still doesn't explicitly note the exemption of Tennessee, along with 1/4 of Louisiana surrounding New Orleans and what would become West Virginia. The 1st especially is quite surprising.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 01/01/2013 - 4:16pm
Enjoy discussing the states not mentioned with yourself. I'm leaving old baggage behind.
It's 2013. This is a celebratory day.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 01/01/2013 - 5:03pm
Enjoy.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 01/01/2013 - 6:12pm
The National Archives is open today to allow citizens to read the original 5 page document.The archives includes a heart-breaking letter to President Lincoln from Annie Davis, a slave held in Maryland, a state not effected by the Proclamation. She pleads for freedom. The is no record of a reply from Lincoln. The obvious answer would have been that she was not freed by the Emancipation Proclamation.
The National Archives has a free ebook explaining the history of the document.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 01/01/2013 - 2:30pm
Wonderful!
I am with Resistance on this.
That is, the Declaration of Independence did nothing to help our slaves but without this document the Emancipation Proclamation would never have been signed, sealed and delivered and neither would the 13th, 14th or 15th Amendments.
This is a great day in American History; a great day in World History for sure.
by Richard Day on Tue, 01/01/2013 - 2:47pm
But it did contribute directly to emancipation, as the Union armies liberated the slaves as they advanced. Lincoln's lesser known Reconstruction Proclamation ensured that the conquered Confederate states would have to abolish slavery in order to re-enter the Union.
by Aaron Carine on Tue, 01/01/2013 - 9:44pm
That was in Dec 1863, and it's interesting that Lincoln did a pocket veto that month on a bill that would require a specific route to reconstruction - he still wanted to leave the details to the states, as he noted in July 1864. (Louisiana and Arkansas had already applied for readmission). That flexibility is ultimately what led Andrew Johnson to be impeached, as more vindictive radical Republicans wanted revenge. The specific Tenure Act that he was impeached on was later declared unconstitutional as infringing on Executive prerogative.
by PeraclesPlease on Wed, 01/02/2013 - 2:42am
Okay, but he wasn't willing to leave the slavery question up to the ex-Confederate states. They were required to abolish it.
by Aaron Carine on Wed, 01/02/2013 - 8:03am
I'm not arguing - simply clarifying some of the order of things.
by PeraclesPlease on Wed, 01/02/2013 - 8:14am
Abe gets to see how it turned out 149 years later:
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/01/03/the_candid_commander_in...
by artappraiser on Fri, 01/04/2013 - 5:10pm