MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
I'm more than a bit of old fogy I guess and more than a bit of a curmudgeon as well, But I do remember when things were quite different than now. Some very disturbing changes have taken place and Sam Smith lists them here.
- The most radical and irrational Republican Party. To be sure, there had been Joe McCarthy but among those who eventually put him down were normal conservatives who found him embarrassing. Those people don't seem to exist any more in the GOP.
- The most conservative Democratic president. In an earlier time, there would have been a name for Obama: Republican.
- People who would have formerly been considered political jokes are now talking about running for president, such as Michelle Bachman, Sarah Palin, and Donald Trump. To be sure there was a Pogo for President movement and comedian Pat Paulsen's campaign, but neither had a PAC.
- An unprecedented level of political nastiness. I can't, for example, remember a segregationist politician calling for blacks to be shot and killed by helicopter like "feral hogs" as recently proposed for immigrants by a Kansas legislator.
- A record bipartisan contempt for civil liberties. Never has a Democratic president or a Republican Party been so eclectically contemptuous of constitutional rights. As William Shirer, author of a great book Nazism, pointed out, "You don't need a totalitarian dictatorship like Hitler's to get by with murder . . . You can do it in a democracy as long as the Congress and the people Congress is supposed to represent don't give a damn."
- A decline in the respect for facts. In America's political debate, facts are now treated like just another ad hominem argument to be dismissed with colorful rhetoric. And numbers are considered simply another form of adjective.
- A Democratic administration without a single cabinet member one can truly admire.
- A Democratic Congress with only a tiny handful of party members who might have supported either the New Deal or the Great Society. But you can't save the republic just relying on Bernie Sanders, Dennis Kucinich and Anthony Weiner.
- A stunningly vacuous cultural leadership and a weird willingness to let Jon Stewart take care of all it for us.
- Massive passivity by, rather than reaction from, the nation's young.
- The extraordinary level of bipartisan contempt (depending on who is in which office) for the constitutional powers of the Congress and states.
- The sense one has of Obama seeing himself as a CEO rather than a political leader of multi-faceted democratic institutions. And our treatment as either consumers or employees.
- The level of mind-blowing bureaucratic complexity of new policies such as the healthcare legislation, which no one has truly figured out.
- The willingness to replace legal argument with euphemisms to accomplish violations of the Constitution and international law.
- The bipartisan indifference and ineffectiveness regarding the ecological crises around us, all the more striking because the evidence of ecological danger is now far stronger than when the modern environmental movement started four decades ago.
- The unprecedented willingness by Democrats - from Obama on down - to dismantle great programs of the New Deal and the Great Society.
- A loss of privacy unlike any time I have experienced.
- record number of people on food stamps.
- A record collapse in housing prices.
- The first decline in family net worth since the 1950s
- Record high average temperatures.
That's just for starters.
Just for starters for sure. Oh the 1950s and 60s were not all roses. With the Cold War and everyone worrying about getting fried by a nuclear attack. Life for minorities sucked and women were still expected to marry and settle down. Men not so much. Sam I think is older n I so remembers more than I do. But even Joe McCarthy would blush at some of the incivility we hear these days. And even Richard Nixon would have supported Obama.
Comments
Richard Nixon would have supported Obama.
Yes and no-he did say "if the president does it, it must be legal", but I'm not sure he would have gone for outright assasination (cf. Awlaki)--Nixon had the decency to insist that murder be done sub rosa
by jollyroger on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 1:13am
Now Dickie Cheney thought we would be welcomed in Iraq cum rosae. Right?
by Richard Day on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 1:22am
Cogitationis poenam nemo patitur.
by kyle flynn on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 1:37am
Cogito ergo doleo.
by kyle flynn on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 1:41am
On the money Smity. While change is good, your list points out that there are some changes that are not.
by Tommy Holmes on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 7:13am
I really do not believe that there would be to many (if nay) in congress during the 1950s and 60s that would approve of Wall Streets shenanigans. The verbiage we are hearing are personal attacks couched and thinly veiled in political rhetoric. I am amazed there has not been an out and out bar room brawl break out in congress.
The last truly honest thing I think was uttered in those hallowed halls was when Cheney gave the F-Bomb and finger to someone. The guy's a complete ass and total slime but it it was real. And this is going on on both sides of the fence.
by cmaukonen on Fri, 03/18/2011 - 9:32am