The Bishop and the Butterfly: Murder, Politics, and the End of the Jazz Age
    Donal's picture

    Will Micro-Hybrids Catch On?

    Several automotive blogs -  Autoblog Green, Green Car Congress and GreenPowerTrain, below - have recently cited an announcement from battery maker PowerGenix:

    PowerGenix unveils NiZn batteries for global micro-hybrid market

    PowerGenix CEO Dan Squiller said micro-hybrids are about to become a fact of life in the auto industry and within four years, almost two out of five new cars sold globally will be micro-hybrids. ... The company said that the start-stop system improves fuel efficiency by up to 10% and is a cost-effective vehicle electrification technology, which is expected to be standard in Europe, with automakers in China and the US following quickly to adopt the technology on a mass scale.

    That's great but what is a micro-hybrid? While a Full Hybrid has an alternate and separate powertrain that can propel a vehicle, a Mild Hybrid may only offer alternate power assistance at certain speeds, regenerative braking and a start-stop function. The Micro-Hybrid is just an ordinary internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle with a start-stop system, and small electric motors to run AC and pumps instead of serpentine belts. 

    What is a start-stop system? Instead of sitting in traffic, idling, wasting gas and exhausting fumes, a start-stop system will shut down the ICE when the vehicle is slowing or stopped and restart it upon acceleration. You could try that yourself, but it's supposed to be bad for the starter. Bosch estimates that start-stop systems can yield a five percent improvement in fuel efficiency, but since the EPA only includes one full stop in their city economy test, that efficiency barely shows up in their MPG ratings.

    Start-stop, or idle-stop, systems were in use in a few European cars back in the 1980s and seem to have been slowly improving and gaining ground there ever since. Wired wrote about them as a solution to tighter Euro emission standards in 2006, and they seem very suited to small Euro diesels, and smaller cars in general. By 2008, Citroen/Peugeot was promising to make start-stop standard in their cars by 2010. In 2010, Lux Research said that micro-hybrids weren't sexy enough yet, but would dominate the US market by 2015.  In a recent article, another analyst, Frost & Sullivan, sees start-stop taking until 2020 to dominate Europe but moving slowly in the US.  

    Gentlemen: Stop Your Engines

    Because [Start-Stop] systems are relatively inexpensive and undeniably save gas and money, close to 100% of vehicles manufactured in Europe will have start-stop systems by 2020, according to industrial consulting firm Frost & Sullivan. But bringing wide-spread start-stop technology to all, or even most, cars to the U.S. has come at more of a glacial speed. Start-stop systems in the U.S. are used with hybrid vehicles (the electric motor in hybrids is used to restart the gasoline engine). The only conventionally powered (non-hybrid) vehicle to carry the technology now is the Porsche Panamera. ...

    Strategy Analytics estimates that it costs an automaker between $162 and $333 per vehicle to add these systems. A full hybrid system, such as those in the Toyota Prius or Ford Fusion, which need heavy robust batteries to propel the whole vehicle at times, drive up cost to the consumer by $3,000 to $5,000, compared with non-hybrid vehicles. The cost differential for consumers of start-stop technology cars is much more digestible.

    GM and Honda have already turned to less expensive Mild Hybrids for their Malibu, Civic and Insight hybrids, so it wouldn't surprise if manufacturers tried to satisfy consumer desire for greater fuel efficiency with start-stop systems on their smaller vehicles. 

    Topics: 

    Comments

    That's pretty cool. Had never heard of the start-stop systems before.

    I dunno though, one way of reading this is that they are planning on basically making the same ICE cars with a +5% fuel gain some fifteen/twenty years into the future. Sort of seems like the system has the effect of allowing them drag their feet on scaling-up needed tech to industrial levels required so lower prices can drive wider adoption of alternative vehicle power sources.

    I'm thinking one of THESE things is looking pretty groovy. Needs to be beefed up a bit, but still ... bad ass.


    I suspect adoption of Start-Stop was slowed down by cheap gas in the 90s, but I doubt gas will get so cheap that they can afford to ignore it any more.


    Agreed. And of course to the extent that traditional gas motors continued to be used, it it certainly a good thing.

    I just wonder if the need hasn't moved on to where adopting widely and calling it a "solution" at this stage is kind of ten years or so behind the curve. I'd hate to see this take the place of the more robust hybrids which seem to be a transition technology that moves more in the direction of commercializing systems needed for full electrics.


    Well, if the mild Insight takes sales away from the Prius, etc., it will already be happening. But some folk buy cell phones and some buy Blackberries and some buy Droids and iPhones. I think those that can afford them will buy full hybrid cars and SUVs while those who can't will have to consider milds and micro-hybrids.