MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
And here I'll get personal. I can't speak for the millions like myself who have faith that she'll make a damn good president, but my reasons make sense to me.
I was born in 1937, the year after FDR was re-elected to his second term. My mother was 19 years old when she gave birth and I’m told it was no hardship for her to have to give up her five-year career as a housemaid in order to take care of me. Her eighth grade graduation marked the end of her schooling, and no amount of begging would change her father's mind. It was time for her to go to work, and employment for a 14-year-old girl in the 1930’s was limited in the main to cleaning houses. When she married my father at 17 any ambitions, any dreams she might have had were stuffed into a quiet place, nearly forgotten.
I was the same age, 19, when I gave birth to my first child in 1957. I had no ambitions beyond being a wife and a mother, no illusions about where my life would take me. It would take me where my husband led me. It's true that I could not buy property without my husband as co-signer, could not get a credit card unless he agreed and signed for it, had to sign my name as Mrs. His Name, but I didn't feel stifled, I was not unhappy. It was the life I chose. It was the way it was.
Other women were not so lucky, and, as oblivious as I seemed to be about barriers to my own latent potential, I was acutely aware of the struggles, the burdens of so many other women, both inside and outside my circle.
The smart ones struggled to become educated, and then, once they'd climbed that hurdle, struggled to be able to use their talents to build meaningful careers.
The talented ones, the clever ones, the eccentrics, struggled to bring meaning to a natural creativity bursting to be free, to be recognized, to be celebrated.
The meek ones struggled to get through the day with their bodies and souls intact.
And then, in 1963, Betty Friedan wrote "The Feminine Mystique". It was, to put it mildly, an awakening. I hadn't realized until then that I was asleep, too. I can't say I became a full-fledged member of the Feminist Movement, but I sat up and took notice. I was a charter subscriber to Ms Magazine, paying for my subscription even before the first issue came out.
No woman came out of that mid-20th century era without scars. Some were deeper than others, but none of us escaped the efforts to dismiss us, to demean us, to turn us into children or dehumanized objects.
By the time the movement came along, I was a housewife and a mother, struggling like everyone else to make sure the month didn't end before the money, but I wasn't so wrapped up in my own life that I wasn’t fully aware of the reasons for a revolutionary feminist uprising. I wasn’t in need of liberation, but millions of other women were. I couldn't turn my back on them.
We went through the first few years struggling to explain the need to be liberated, to be treated fairly, to be seen, and a few more decades of outwardly insisting. It should be obvious to everyone that we're not there yet. Which brings me to Hillary Clinton.
During the 2008 presidential election, I supported Barack Obama over Hillary. My initial image of Hillary was as the embattled First Lady who messed up our chances at universal health care, and as the woman who said she would never just stand by her man like Tammy Wynette, but then, when Bill’s philandering became a reason for impeachment, she did. I had heard enough about her to believe she wasn't trustworthy, she wasn't real, she wasn't ready or fit to be president. I barely remember the arguments for her. I vividly remember the arguments against her. They’re the same arguments we're seeing this time, updated to include her time as Secretary of State, adding another seven years' worth of grievances.
When I saw she was planning another run for the presidency I wondered what the hell was wrong with that woman. Only a flipping masochist would want to be put through that wringer again.
I thought I would be supporting Bernie Sanders. His ideas were much closer to mine. He seemed far more heroic, our idealistic Don Quixote, our everyman, one of us. His message,"We're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore", struck the exact right notes after so many years of near-stagnation. But I couldn't get Hillary out of my mind. Her reasons for running had to be more than raging ambition, more than the ultimate power trip, more than a golden opportunity for payback.
Then I watched the Benghazi marathon, the interrogation set up solely to once and for all humiliate and bring down this exasperating, uppity woman. I watched the entire 11 hours, banging away on my laptop, searching out the truth, the real truth, about Hillary. How did I not know she was a feminist? How did I not know of her work with women and children all over the world? I saw that much of the work she did for so many of us went unsung. She was all about the work and not all about the glory. She took the slings and arrows and flung them aside. She never let them get in her way.
Even before the hearing was over I knew I would support her and not look back. It took a few days before I was ready to admit it in public, but I did it, to the dismay of some who thought I couldn’t possibly be serious. And to others who saw me as a turncoat, a traitor, a goddamned vagina.
We tend to forget that Hillary Clinton is a consummate politician. She thinks like a politician, she acts and reacts like a politician, she eats, breathes and sleeps in the midst of politics. She is not perfect, she has made big mistakes, she’s not always nice. She’s not like you and me. She has spent her entire adult life working toward this moment and now she’s at the door, working to push it open, wanting to see that ceiling come crashing down. And I’m right behind her, wanting to see it, too. She’s not the only one who’s been waiting a lifetime for this.
(Cross-posted at Ramona's Voices)
Comments
This is a great essay.
As a boomer I was interested in mothers.
My mom had five kids (as well as a couple miscarriages).
Most of my friends had more than a few siblings. My best friend David had six siblings and the boys slept on cots in the basement of their ranch style suburban home.
In those days there were the Protestants with two or three kids and the Roman Catholics had five or more. hahaha
I think that this is one reason I am astonished by Representative Pelosi. Four kids? and she ends up Speaker?
I know she has always had money but damn...........
Nowadays there is more pressure on Dad to help out from time to time. Unlike the olden days when the Dads I knew would actually go fishing whilst Mom delivered another one. hahahahah
Anyway, the climbs of people like Pelosi and Hillary just amaze me.
THE WORLD HAS CHANGED!
by Richard Day on Sat, 06/11/2016 - 9:44am
Yes, it has, much of it for the better. I love seeing today's dads being real dads and not just baby-sitters if and when they choose. I love that there is now real birth control and not just condoms or rhythm method, and blaming the woman if she got pregnant. I love that girls don't romanticize marriage and motherhood and give themselves a chance to grow up and get out in the world before they make those decisions. There is much still to be done, and the symbolism of a female president won't go unnoticed. That's not the only reason to vote for Hillary, but if she wins, her inauguration will be the shot heard round the world.
by Ramona on Sat, 06/11/2016 - 10:16am
I love that there's chemical abortion and sex is for good ol' fun until you decide you want those wigworms and then you can obsess over those little litmus papers until it turns out positive. It's a major psychological and philosophical brekthrough that sex isn't (or doesnt half to be) concomitant and laden down by fear of childbirth, and yet the urge to procreate remains healthy enough. The war on abortion will one day be seen roughly like the use of leeches to "save" someone. That human cells divide, grow, die every day without requiring comment does nothing to diminish the miracle of birth at the right time for the right reasons. This bit about anatomy, women's "place", and the steady detachment from the proscriptions of religion remain a profound piece of our modern struggle. Psychologically it's huge - I'd guess very few women think of abortion as anything but a massive decision even today, while 1 of 2 parties has made it a critical issue beyond any other. How long will this last, while the rest of the world evolves? Still superstitious people, we need another 50 years to come around to physiolgy and genetics, and during that time it'll remain a major danger to politics, giving mental retro primitives the visceral upper hand.
by PeraclesPlease on Sat, 06/11/2016 - 11:14am
We still live in a society where men are in better positions to make decisions for and about women. They hold more public offices, they hold more corporate offices, their numbers lead in all positions of power. Things haven't changed enough so that the idea of a woman as POTUS is seen as the natural evolution.
When we say, "If men had wombs birth control wouldn't be an issue", everyone knows what it means. It means it's a man's world. No question. So this one wrinkle--a woman is now as close as it comes to being the leader of the free world, the commmander-in-chief, the top dog--wasn't in the plans and isn't acceptable.
What happens now is anybody's guess, but if Hillary does win the White House women everywhere will take it as a sign that our time has come. It'll be interesting to see how that goes over. I suspect it'll be much worse than having the first black man living there.
by Ramona on Sat, 06/11/2016 - 2:03pm
From FiveThirtyEight:
Of course a lot of those aye's might be asterisk'd with a variety of unachievable requirements - I doubt in practical terms it was 90% in 1998 - maybe just tribute to Sigourney Weaver. Even my mother used to (still does?) question whether she thought a woman could hold it together during her time of month, presumably an issue Hillary doesn't have to contend with.
In any case, I'd foolishly thought women would be much less sexualized by 2016. Hope for discernible progress in 50 years.
by PeraclesPlease on Sat, 06/11/2016 - 2:46pm
Ramona, when I get time I will come back to comment on this excellent, very personal yet objective piece. But I've been watching CNN this am and when they can tear themselves away from the Trump spectacle (including debating about whether he is, in fact a racist!!!!), the only thing they can bring themselves to mention about Hillary are "scandals!" It's outrageous.
by CVille Dem on Sat, 06/11/2016 - 11:11am
Ramona, I read this today http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/6/11/1537582/-The-most-thorough-pro..., and sent it to all my Bernie-supporter-friends who will vote (unenthusiastically) for Hillary. I will come back with quotes, but the author makes a very good argument that sexism is the biggest part of what started the anti-Hillary meme that so many people have fallen for.
Here's an example:
And more:
I'm not going to quote the whole thing here, and I didn't even get to the part where the author, Michael Arnovitz, makes a very substantive case for sexism being the reason for the double standard. I'll paraphrase:
Liar: Politifact rates her higher than most in truthfulness, where Donald is rated at 98% false
Speech fees: Rudy Juliiani made $750,000 in speaking fees, many to Wall Street right before he ran for President. Noise? None
Emails; Petraeus gave his mistress books detailing military plans, conversations with the President, and other information -- ALL CLASSIFIED -- lied to the FBI about it, and then subsequently admitted everything. Yet the GOP offers him high positions, and some want him to run for President. But they continually call Hillary a felon who needs to go to jail!
Unfavorability: Donald has higher unfavorables but several newspaper articles are sited that state Hillary will have a hard time beating him because of her unfavorables.,,WTF?
Health Care: She was the first Democrat to EVER try to get health care for all. She tried and tried, and lost a good deal of Capitol when her efforts went down in flames. But the Bernie-or-busters despise the fact that she wants to advance the ACA and get more people covered more comprehensively rather than throwing it all out and getting Universal free health care (which any sane person knows is impossible currently).
I'll stop here, but this is a good example of how the far-right and the far-left seem to be vulnerable to unsubstantiated attacks on her character, which have become true, not because they are, but because they have been repeated so many times.
My tablet is acting up so I will stop here.
Great piece, Ramona -- Brava!
by CVille Dem on Sun, 06/12/2016 - 12:14pm
Thanks so much, CVille. I think I might have shared that same piece on FB. It speaks to many of us. But, again, your comments should be in blog form. We need to talk about this. I have no doubt that much of the animus toward Hillary has as much to do with her gender as with anything else. It's hard to convince people that that's the case, because very few people, male or female, want to believe they have gender biases.
by Ramona on Sun, 06/12/2016 - 2:26pm
Sadly, in 2008 Hillary faced BrosBeforeHos. In 2016, she faced BernieBros. If Hillary had complained about the system being rigged as much as Bernie, she would have been labeled weak.
by rmrd0000 on Mon, 06/13/2016 - 8:29am
It didn't start out as personal for me. Just a decision about who the next president should be.
Well before it became personal, I'd started doing my homework. Really, even before she declared.
After the 2008 elections, I had to rethink how I felt about her. The way she handled her defeat surprised me. I expected a half-hearted endorsement of Obama. I NEVER expected her to work so hard to get him elected. And I NEVER expected him to offer her such a prominent position in his administration. I don't know if it was negotiated in advance and he did it reluctantly, or if he came up with the idea himself, but one way or the other, as time went by he grew to trust her and admire her. And since I trust and admire him, I had to pay attention to that.
So I began my research. And much to my surprise, as I watched the right relentlessly try to destroy President Obama, I realized, that they had, in fact, been doing the same thing to her, only for decades. So many of the charges against her were based on little more that innuendo, and someone WANTING the scandals to be true. Worse yet, a whole bunch of it started to smell like sexism - the need to destroy a strong woman - before she took over the place.
And with THAT discovery, it became personal.
I've gone from distrusting, and yes, even HATING her, to her being one my idols. Just the fact that she is still in the game after all the crap they've thrown at her is amazing. She doesn't just have thick skin - she's coated in kevlar.
I have come to respect and admire her. I recognize that all women owe her a debt of gratitude for not curling up with a blankie and giving up. She has fought, not only for herself, but for us. And I feel extremely protective of her. I know she isn't perfect, and there are times when I have to groan at the way she's phrased something. But I KNOW her heart is in the right place. She has shown an amazing ability to evolve, especially on social issues (religious based ones) which can be difficult for many Christians to do, given that it means rejecting what we've been taught our whole lives.
I trust her to have a clear and steady hand at the helm. I trust her to seek the advice of wise counsel, and listen to all points of view before coming to decisions. She'll make mistakes, just as President Obama has, but I think she'll learn from his, and perhaps make fewer of her own.
If you want to attack her, you'll have to get by me first. Me and a whole bunch of other women and the men who understand and agree with them. We're not the quiet, submissive ladies we used to be. And it scares the crap outta them.
#I'mwithher
by stillidealistic on Thu, 06/16/2016 - 12:12pm
Hillary was the only one vetted by the press. She got the hard questions. Interviews with Bernie were never as harsh as the ones Hillary faced. Trump got free airtime. The only reason that his campaign is floundering is because he is an idiot with a mouth tat cannot be controlled. The press never went after Trump's bigotry until his numbers started crashing.
by rmrd0000 on Thu, 06/16/2016 - 12:24pm
Beautifully said, Stilli. I couldn't agree more. From what I've seen of Hillary, she'll just ignore the haters and get to work. I can't wait.
by Ramona on Mon, 06/20/2016 - 2:25pm