Sorry you didn't find it a useful inside look as I did. Despite the fact that of course the guy is is only going to talk about his successess and not his failures, it definitely gave me an overview that a lot of shit goes on outside the courtroom, equal to if not more than in the civilian system, that there is a ton of plea bargaining and all kinds of deals going on between prosecutors and defense lawyers. and it is not as straightforward or strict as it is often depicted. Plus it seems not that unusual for the juries to acquit even when all kinds of military bigwigs are testifying against the defendant.

Also they are not all sex cases, though those are the most common; here's a couple quick picks from the first page that are not:

• June 2010, U.S. v. Army E-5 - Baumholder (Smith Barracks), Germany - Summary - Our client, an infantry soldier, was charged with multiple aggravated assaults on Iraqi insurgents/detainees and dereliction of duty.  He allegedly stuck a gun in the mouths of 3 different Iraqi detainees and supposedly severely beat another in the back of an MRAP in Sadr City, Iraq causing grievous bodily harm.  The prosecution charged the client and an Article 32 was scheduled on very short notice, giving Mr. Waddington only days to prepare and to be present to defend the client. This was done although the Government knew that the client was represented by Mr. Waddington. Mr. Waddington has a busy trial schedule and is located in the USA. In Mr. Waddington's opinion, which is based on years of experience in dealing with Army prosecutors, his experience in defending many court martial cases, his knowledge of the Smith Barracks prosecutors and his experience as a former JAG lawyer, this was done to catch the defense off guard and to deprive the client the ability to be prepared and to mount a defense. Mr. Waddington, believing that the prosecution was bluffing, cleared his schedule and rushed to Germany to defend the case with a few days notice.  The defense team quickly investigated the background of the accusers, including a disgruntled 1LT (the main instigator of the allegations) and prepared to battle at the Article 32.  The lead prosecutor expected us to delay the Article 32 (this info was told to Mr. Waddington by an Army JAG stationed at Smith Barracks). The defense aggressively fought the charges at the Article 32.  The Article 32 officer recommended a trial on 2 of the 6 charges.  The case was sent to the Commanding General with a recommendation that the case go to trial. The prosecution tried to get the charges referred (sent to a court martial). In Mr. Waddington's experience, the General/convening authority almost always follows the recommendation of the prosecution/SJA. In other words, if the prosecution wants to take the case to trial, then the General agrees. In an attempt to stop the court martial, the defense wrote and sent a memorandum to the Commanding General. In the memo, the defense explained why the charges should be dropped and why the case should not be sent to court martial. The General refused to send the case to court martial, against the recommendation of the Government.
  Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED BY THE COMMANDING GENERAL

• Nov 2007 - U.S. v. Army E-1 - Fort Gordon, Georgia - Soldier accused of running an international vehicle theft ring, making expensive sports cars "disappear" and filing theft reports and insurance claims, conspiracy to steal and attempted larceny of $39,000 from All State Insurance, and numerous other offenses. FBI and CID conducted a massive investigation. Started at Felony General Court Martial. Best offer was 24 months, then 18 months and a felony conviction. Fought charges at Article 32. Convinced 32 officer to reduce charges to a misdemeanor BCD special. Soldier confessed and FBI recorded 14 hours of his incriminating statements. Soldier had several past Field Grade Article 15s. Plead to misdemeanor charges without a deal in front of a judge. Beat the best plea deal offered by 9 months.
  
  
• Oct 2007 - U.S. v. Army E-7 - Yongsan, South Korea - Senior NCOIC for 4 star GEN B.B. Bell and GEN LaPorte charged with 10 charges, facing over 70 years in prison. Command wanted to "make example" out of soldier. Charges included numerous counts of TDY fraud to New York City & DC x 4, larceny of travel funds for trips to NYC & DC x 4, conspiracy to steal Gov't funds, lying on reenlistment documents to cover up past arrests and probation. Fought all charges at jury trial. A General, 3 Colonels, and 2 CW4's testified against client. NOT GUILTY OF ALL CHARGES. FULL ACQUITTAL.