MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Lawrence Wilkerson: Why Idaho will Vote for Romney and Drone Strikes
Comments
The second half of this fifteen minute video interview is about foreign policy. Attitudes of western voters are discussed first and are worth a listen.
by A Guy Called LULU on Sun, 10/21/2012 - 6:41pm
Thanks for the link....but... The guy (1) Lives in Idaho (means anything...?) (2) is looking forward' to the debates, and also 'thinks they are meaningless' (3) talks a lot about hunting and fishing.
(4)He was Colin Powell's Chief of Staff and apparently had a week to actually prepare the infamous FEb. 2003 Powell UN speech, full of lies, that laid out the necessity for the Iraq War.
He was for the Iraq war, later, was critical of how it was played out. Thinks Bush was a very bad guy. I assume he thinks he is a good guy. Even though he was closely involved in making the case for the war.
I don't think Wilkerson would be a guy I would seek out for opinions on where the nation needs to go from here.
by NCD on Mon, 10/22/2012 - 10:23am
I sent the same link to a friend and you might be surprised how closely my accompanying introductory message was to what you have written here. I have been watching and reading Wilkerson for a while and I usually think his analysis is right on and so I have begun to watch for what he says. But, as I told my buddy, Wilkerson spent half his career planted way up Powell's ass and that makes me wonder if he is just looking for a new niche to fill.I even included a colon joke which I won't repeat here.
Even though that is the case, he could be an informed voice with the right experience and connections to offer insight on a variety of questions.
Wilkerson's comments on the people he talked to in the west seemed spot on as far as describing the prevailing general ethic. I say that based on my own experience living in Utah and having traveled extensively in most states west of the Mississippi camping, fishing, shooting pool, and drinking beer in places unlike any I expect exist in D.C. and among people who are not like the crowds in D.C. either.
So, to your point one, his host living in Idaho I think was a fair source for local/regional opinions. I am often struck by how easy it is to dismiss the beliefs of 'the other side' but I am also struck by the fact that the other side does, in fact, believe what they believe with as much conviction as do people here at Dag. Both side think the other side is wrong and that at least some of them are crazy and their ideas are counterproductive at best and often dangerous. I have talked to numerous people recently who think Obama was the big lier in both debates and Romney exposed him for what he 'really is' both times. Biden was a rude jerk, full of crap, and wouldn't recognize the truth if it was draped around his head. They say. They say it and believe it and few around them challenge it.
Your point two describes me. I will watch the debate but I expect that most of what I will see will be meaningless as to substance.
On point three, it should be noted that I described it wrong when I called it an interview. It is, apparently, just an ongoing contribution Wilkerson makes to that program as an essayist. Hanging around with hunters and fishers when politics is in the air is a pretty good way to hear what they really think. It's also a pretty good way to spend a vacation. A lot of hunters and fishers are great people to be around and Idaho has, to my mind, some of the most beautiful places in our country. I have no idea how to reconcile the fact that a lot of the people with whacko ideas are pretty good people who you would like as neighbors, find easy to work with, and are dedicated family people, but they just can't seem to recognize that I am the one who is right.
by A Guy Called LULU on Mon, 10/22/2012 - 12:10pm