The Supreme Court will never let Trump's tax returns see the light of day. Even if it was in the Constitution "Congress shall have the right to .....Trump's tazes and finances" they would not allow it, defer, delay, obstruct it for years.

The arguments were interesting. The Justices spoke more cogently than the lawyers in front of them.

The fact that Trump did not divest or put his business into a Trust is a new thing regarding precedent. It would not be surprising if the Court kicks that one down the road until those sorts of limits are made matters of Law. It had been a Code of Gentlemen up to now. The emoluments clause was drafted more toward an eye to avoiding Foreigners buying influence than stanching internal corruption. Banks have been the standard way to keep that sort of thing on the down low but now you have this friggin Real Estate Dealer crashing the boy dance party.

The response to Alito regarding the security of the Grand Jury process is important. That points toward the New York State subpoenas going forward on the basis of the system being able to function as it should. As a point of delimitation, the Supreme Court itself can only assume that sort of competence to go forward.