MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Deustche Welle, March 15, 2011
Chancellor Angela Merkel announced Tuesday that her government is taking the seven oldest German nuclear power plants off the grid, at least temporarily, following a meeting with five state premiers....Merkel's move is a U-turn in her energy policy...The decision was made as a direct result of the nuclear disaster currently unfolding at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan.....
Also see:
France's government defends its stake in nuclear energy
Deustche Welle, March 15, 2011
Japan's ongoing nuclear catastrophe has had an immediate impact on the German government's unpopular nuclear policies. But in neighboring France, which gets nearly four-fifths of its energy from nuclear power, the political establishment is pushing back, determined to reassure the public that its nuclear facilities are secure. French President Nicolas Sarkozy said ending nuclear power was "out of the question."....
Comments
She's just playing to the audience.
If you think about it, the nuclear reactors in Japan didn't have a problem. They were working as expected without a problem until the earthquake which set into motion a chain of events that causes the oh shit moments we're witnessing...the earthquake and tsunami didn't cause any direct damage to the reactors. As I understand it, the problem with the reactors was the result of loosing external electrical power, main and back-up, to keep pumping water into the reactor to keep it cool.
Germans are extremely efficient so there's little to worry about. I suspect they're just reviewing their power back-up planning to validate there would be ample power resources available in short order if a catastrophe, like Japan's, ever occurred. Besides, when was the last time Germany had to worry about powerful earthquakes, other than old underground, abandoned coal mines collapsing? or tsunamis? Think of it as soothing those with the Chicken Little Complex...the sky is falling!!! the sky is falling !!!
by Beetlejuice on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 8:43am
Are earthquakes and tsunamis the only things that can go wrong, or the first things that have happened so far?
by Donal on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 8:45am
One of the concerns about Chernobyl was in the event of a power grid failure, external power would not have been immediately available to run the plant's cooling water pumps...exactly what's happened in Japan. And why I suspect Merkel is drawing down those older nuclear power plants...make damn sure there's plenty of power available immediately without hesitation so they don't experience catastrophic failure like Chernobyl and Japan.
As to your question, the best I can figure out, cooling is the biggest problem so far :
3-mile island - On March 28, 1979, there was a cooling system malfunction that caused a partial melt-down of the reactor core.
Chernobyl - The disaster began during a systems test on 26 April 1986 at reactor number four of the Chernobyl plant, which is near the town of Pripyat. There was a sudden power output surge, and when an emergency shutdown was attempted, a more extreme spike in power output occurred, which led to a reactor vessel rupture and a series of explosions.
The wikipedia artile is more indepth...keep in mind this was during the cold war so info is at best ballpark variety
url - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster
by Beetlejuice on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 9:34am
For designs where the coolant doubles as the moderator, if you lose the coolant, you also lose the moderator (meaning the reaction stops). Of course, you still have to worry about the existing heat, but at least you don't have a run-away nuclear reaction!
by Verified Atheist on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 8:49am