MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
A Conservative friend posted this article from Forbes magazine's website on my Facebook page as a rebuttal to something I posted.about the deficit. The article is full of the usual GOP talking points, but I found this quote fascinating:
" ... the federal government owns vast amounts of land west of the Mississippi river — land that’s valued between $500 billion to $1 trillion according to the Congressional Research Service. Selling that land for private use would bring huge financial windfalls that could be used to responsibly pay down federal deficits, and provide untold economic growth."
I had not heard this idea. It seems to me that if the civil rights bill lost the Democrats the South for a generation, selling the Grand Canyon, Muir Woods, etc. would lose the West for Republicans for at least a generation or two. Would Republicans really throw Teddy Roosevelt under the bus? What do you think?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2013/10/18/heavily-in-debt-millenni...
Comments
It would lose the whole country of voters to the GOP. The rich is going to just have to resign to the fact that the tax man is coming. The GOP don't weld enough power to do that. Dream on Forbes.
by trkingmomoe on Sun, 10/20/2013 - 11:08pm
Suggest a federal property tax to your friend instead.
by EmmaZahn on Mon, 10/21/2013 - 10:20pm
Ha! You really know how to make a Conservative's head explode, don't you?
by MrSmith1 on Tue, 10/22/2013 - 7:10am
Cheney was attempting to advocate this 'sale' during w's Administration.
But, of course, Dicky would sell the land to the capitalistic pigs for ten cents on the dollar!
by Richard Day on Tue, 10/22/2013 - 4:19am
Cheney was attempting to advocate this 'sale' during w's Administration.
But, of course, Dicky would sell the land to the capitalistic pigs for ten cents on the dollar!
by Richard Day on Tue, 10/22/2013 - 4:19am
I did a NYTimes search and found this map & chart from a March 23, 2012 article on Utah's governor trying to get some of it returned to state control. The map shows a striking difference, that the Fed government really does own an extreme amount of the land in the 13 furthest west states and comparatively very little percentage in other states. On the map the difference appears like night & day.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/03/23/us/western-land-owned-by-t...
Here's the data from the chart, the percent of each state owned by the Fed:
Nevada 84.5%
Alaska 69.1%
Utah 57.5%
Oregon 53.1%
Idaho 50.2%
Arizona 48.1%
California 45.3%
Wyoming 42.3%
New Mexico 41.8%
Colorado 36.6%
Washington 30.3%
Montana 29.9%
Hawaii 19.4%
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/22/2013 - 9:16am
Perhaps if the Mayflower landed in San Diego and Manifest Destiny was pushing East instead of West, we might have had a reversal of those numbers.
But all kidding aside, how much of the 48.1% of the land owned by the Federal government in Arizona is the Grand Canyon? How much should we sell to private developers? 50%? It's a ludicrous idea, pushed by men with tiny minds.
by MrSmith1 on Tue, 10/22/2013 - 9:56am
Even they aren't dumb enough to try to sell off the Grand Canyon or any other tourist site. They want the raw land so the can exploit it by cutting and drilling and laying pipe lines. They see nothing but huge profits from all that wasted property. But what happens when it's sold and the money is spent? What comes next? The Great Lakes? If they could get away with selling the air above us, they would do it before midnight.
by Ramona on Tue, 10/22/2013 - 11:20am