MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
The Justices said that the government must prove that the lie is relevant to the case in order to strip someone of citizenship.
By Robert Barnes @ WashingtonPost.com, June 22
The government may not strip someone’s citizenship for lying during the naturalization process without proving the falsehood is relevant, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday. The court unanimously rejected the government’s view that simply proving that someone lied during the process was enough.
Justice Elena Kagan said that would give the government too much power. “The government opens the door to a world of disquieting consequences,” Kagan wrote, adding that it would “give prosecutors nearly limitless leverage — and afford newly naturalized Americans precious little security.”
The position is a long-held one by the federal government, but it has taken on new importance with the Trump administration’s focus on deportation [.....]
Comments
Missed in the Clinton impeachment is that perjury requires the lie be germane to the investigation - his being about consensual relations between 2 adults made it irrelevant to Ken Starr's case. Glad they affirmed again here
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 06/22/2017 - 5:37pm
Thanks. I missed/forgot that tidbit in the Bill Clinton saga.
by rmrd0000 on Thu, 06/22/2017 - 5:50pm
They sent the case back to the lower court. If the lie affected the approval for admission as a refugee, they can still be deported.
by NCD on Thu, 06/22/2017 - 11:23pm