MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Israeli President Reuven Rivlin announced today that he was removing the Israeli flag from his presidential residence in Jerusalem as an acknowledgment of the more than 500 children killed by Israel in Gaza a year ago.
Comments
I considered about ten or fifteen places to post this link. While skimming through them I noticed the following comment on what to me is a similar and related happening.
I do not claim any equivalence between Dr. C's intended reference or meaning and mine, that would be for him to say one way or the other, but that is is a well constructed expression of what I feel so I stole it.
by A Guy Called LULU on Tue, 06/23/2015 - 2:31pm
You put it in the right spot to get noticed and read.
by trkingmomoe on Tue, 06/23/2015 - 6:57pm
If after the events in Charleston SC, the Israeli flag, Jerusalem and Israeli President Reuven Rivlin immediately pop into someone's mind as a 'thought experiment' or some kind of a joke on an anti-Israeli website, I would say that someone has a very unhealthy obsession concerning the Jewish State.
And unlike the headliner on the linked Mondoweiss website 'The War of Ideas in the Middle East', it is the genocidal conflicts, wars and bloodletting all across the Middle East, from Libya to Pakistan, that would make any sane person in the region relieved if to be within sight of an Israeli flag.
by NCD on Tue, 06/23/2015 - 9:06pm
"... ... I would say that someone has a very unhealthy obsession concerning the Jewish State.
That is okay, each to their own conclusions even if they are incoherent, and this is a place to vent them. I conclude that there are some who have a very unhealthy obsession with defending the state of Israel [which I don't believe should be a Jewish state if it is also to be a democratic one which has many citizens who are not Jews, and many under its harsh control who are citizens of, and living in, another country] and who do that knee-jerk defending no matter what.
by A Guy Called LULU on Tue, 06/23/2015 - 10:29pm
You've proved my point.
The guy who produced gems like "you support and defend a President in everything he does just because he is black." also has problems with the Jewish State. (in which over 1.6 million non-Jewish Arabs have citizenship and the same rights to vote as Jews. and also serve and have reached General rank in the Israeli Army.)
So: Blacks get special treatment because they are black, Jews/Jewish State blah blah, etc etc.
There is a coherency there.
by NCD on Wed, 06/24/2015 - 10:28am
Failure of imagination. You want a real thought experiment? Take down all the flags, everywhere.
by Michael Wolraich on Wed, 06/24/2015 - 9:44pm
Real? That's nothing. There's a guy out there who didn't just imagine no flags, he imagined no countries, and no religion too.
by ocean-kat on Wed, 06/24/2015 - 10:01pm
I love that guy.
by kyle flynn on Wed, 06/24/2015 - 11:45pm
This whole episode has some elements that seem odd to me but then most issues which blow up into national news share that quality.
In a previous high comment episode of a Confederate flag fight here at Dag I took a position much like PP has in this one. [i am going by memory here, I rarely archive anything I have submitted and I don’t feel like searching for examples] This was based largely on my own experience growing up, mostly in Texas, where it was not uncommon to see a friend or acquaintance who had a Confederate flag on the back window of their car or pickup. I think more often if it was a pickup. Of course there were thousands of cars of strangers passing every day and some of them had the same. The thing is though, there were also many, many, other decals on cars which seemed no more significant one way or the other. There were decals saying what kind of stereo was installed. There were decals for Nascar or for aftermarket hop up parts that the car may or may not have installed. Rock Bands were promoted on many a car as were Radio stations. Plenty of blue stars over the word “Cowboys”. All kinds of crap. I even knew one guy who had a big long Pontiac with the word ‘Pontiac’ in big letters stretching from the front door to the trunk. To me, that symbolized idiot. I do not recall anyone ever being asked if their Confederate flag meant they were a white supremacist or maybe supported slavery. That is because that flag didn’t have any such meaning either to the person displaying it on their car or the person seeing it. Yes, I’m talking about young men mostly, kids, really, and I know there must have been exceptions and I know it wasn’t Selma Alabama where I cruised through the hamburger stand listening to the Beach Boys singing about cruising through the hamburger stand. In that place where I was in those days, I graduated from high school in the class of 65, that flag was just one of many ways of decorating a car. That was all, just decoration. It wasn’t a political or philosophical statement. The only one I recall ever having on my car was a bumper sticker that said “I support the right to arm bears”. If anyone knows anyone remotely related to them who was ever harmed by a bear [ I know it has happened] I offer my profuse apology and hope they can someday forgive the responsible bear. If not, maybe I can do it for them. I considered one that said “When guns are banned, only cops will have guns” but I chickened out, I didn’t need any extra crap with the cops. Believe it or not, white boys got the juice kicked out of them too for no good reason.
So anyway, I stayed out of the whole damned discussion for quite a while as I had given that view from that perspective before but also because this time it all seemed different. Plus, I have made an issue here of the significance of flags with stylized swastikas being a significant indicator or the political philosophy of the most criminal right wing thugs responsible for so much killing in Ukraine following their significant participation in the coup which ousted the elected leader of that country. A flag certainly can be a potent symbol and I am convinced of what that symbol is intended to represent this very day, not just historically.
So, The other day I read the article in Mondoweiss which I posted, a website the editors call "a news website devoted to covering American foreign policy in the Middle East, chiefly from a progressive Jewish perspective". I think it can be considered to be an anti-Zionist site but not an anti-Israel site even if some cannot comprehend the difference. I read Mondoweiss fairly regularly and I believe they bring valuable information about a subject of interest to me which is our Middle East policy and our relationship with Israel. What I read there nearly always has the ring of truth. And yes, I know that is a view not universally shared.
The way I saw that the article to be a legitimate thought experiment is in how it juxtaposed the reasons voiced so strongly, so convincingly, for the banishment of the Confederate flag with the existence of those same reasons that the Palestinians might hate the Israeli flag.
Isn’t it a bit ironic that most all of the key statements in that made up story were taken as direct quotes from the S.Carolina Governor’s speech which received rave reviews here and in so many other places where the banishment of the Confederate flag is considered to be a great step forward. Rather than a failure of imagination, It seemed to me a pretty imaginative way for Weiss to criticize things about Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians, criticisms I share, and at the same time point out the two way thinking of so many Democrats or liberals, or progressives or whatever brand a person carries who took up the anti-Confederate flag position but never speak up against our heavy, unwavering, unquestioning support of Israel no matter what. That is even as the situation of justice towards the Palestinians is probably worse than that of black Americans even during the days when lynching was common in America. And, if that treatment is actually wrong, we, as voting Americans, share in the responsibility for it.
I am having a failure of imagination right now. I cannot guess what your 'real' thought experiment is intended to lead to or to help us understand.
`
by A Guy Called LULU on Thu, 06/25/2015 - 12:10am
Yes, the Israeli example was pretty wry - that was my purpose with the thought experiment about 2050 when HIspanics make up 35% overall and majorities in most southwest states - what precedents are we setting now, how will they be used then along with similar arguments.
I'd suggest Michael's thought experiment is pretty bland - in the real world we prefer contrasts of garish & ugly and pleasant and knockout pleasing. without the contrast, the flaws, the warts, reality is pretty boring, and then some smartass like Jackson Pollak will have to smash down those pleasantly boring walls again. I dont much like flags, but I haven't really thought of a world without, and there are a lot of symbols that serve th purpose of a flag. How do we show belonging, territory, etc?
Anyway, maybe too philosophical. Rebel yell, get your gumbo on, and see you at the fairgrounds for the stockcar meet - I'll be driving the souped up Camaro
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 06/25/2015 - 12:45am
Hence my proposed thought experiment. Lulu's "thought experiment" isn't a thought experiment at all. It's just a predictable jab at the Israelis from Mondoweiss. One might equally propose that Hamas take down its flag--or Syria or Saudi Arabia or Sudan or any other regime that kills innocent people in racial/religious conflicts (Russia? China? U.S.?). But that's not Lulu or Mondoweiss's bag.
Far more interesting, IMO, to consider the significance of symbolism and nationalism, and the way flags seem to absorb the good and evil of the nations they represent, unevenly and subjectively over time.
by Michael Wolraich on Thu, 06/25/2015 - 10:19am
Cool - you start
by anonymouspp (not verified) on Thu, 06/25/2015 - 11:16am
I already did ;)
by Michael Wolraich on Thu, 06/25/2015 - 11:22am
Michael, I appreciate your honesty both as a commenter and as an arbitrator at your own site. One way I have seen it demonstrated is by the fact that you occasionally give me credit when you think I have added something of value and are fair in your response when you disagree and even when I put forward a view that offends you. In this case you have disagreed with me which is certainly fair and you may certainly be correct in some ways but in doing so you have put forward a view that offends me. That is when you say that “my bag” is poking at Israel. The strong implication, as I see it, is that I take cheap shots at Israel which are not justified and come from bad motives. I am confident that you do not believe that all actions of the Israeli government are above criticism which would make any criticism a cheap shot.
You have an arguable point that what I linked to is not a thought experiment, it may be just an analogy of a similar situation made to express a point of view. Maybe/probably, the authors simply wanted to make a statement but I expect that they hoped their analogy would provoke some thought which would bring their readers to see the similarities of present day’s Palestinian’s situation with that of black Americans in the past which to some extent continues through today. If the analogy as valid then we should, I would say, come to similar conclusions in both cases about a wrong being done to a class of people both because of who they are and made possible by who they are and about who has the responsibility to change that situation and who is justified in fighting for that change. Obviously, changing flags would accomplish little or nothing unless it was brought about by a change in the attitude of the flag bearers.
I do not like flags and I think about it every time I stand up in public and put my hand over my heart while one is worshipped like a graven image. But, right now all I can see in your suggested thought experiment is the equivalent of contemplating how the world would be different if everyone lived in the shadow of a big rock candy mountain. Human nature would still prevail and the roots of tribalism and nationalism would prevail as they do in every town that has, for instance, a school. STAND UP and SING ALONG, EVERYBODY!
When some loud braggart tries to put me down
And says his school is great
I tell him right away
"Now what's the matter buddy
Ain't you heard of my school
It's number one in the state"
Hey hey take it away, let's call it fight
So be true to your school
(Rah rah sis boom bah
[Que the jet fighter fly-over and the aerial fire works display]
by A Guy Called LULU on Thu, 06/25/2015 - 4:20pm
Lulu, as far as I know the phrase, "your/my/his bag" does not strongly or even weakly imply bad motives, and I certainly did not intend any such implication. I don't think it's any secret that Israeli policy is one of your pet issues and that you are far more likely to post about Israeli violence against Palestinians than any other interracial or interreligious conflict. I will cop to some mild dismissiveness toward your preoccupation with the occupation, but I trust to you take that in stride.
As for flags, I share your distaste, and I'm always puzzled by other people's reverence for them. Still I find the phenomenon fascinating. My lengthy response to Atheist about the differences between the Nazi flag and Confederate flag on another thread was an expression of that. As I mentioned to PP above, flags seem to absorb all that is good or bad about a country or regime. The criticism of the Confederate flag is really a repudiation of Southern racism. The defense of the flag is really a defense of South independence. They're both in there, and you can't truly separate either one. Likewise, the American and Israeli flags embody some truly great things and some truly horrible things. Some flags, like the Nazi flag and, I would argue, the Confederate flag, are so stained that you can never redeem them, but in most case, the story is mixed. I had more to say, but my wife just called. Have to run.
by Michael Wolraich on Thu, 06/25/2015 - 8:23pm
Thanks, glad to find I was mistaken. If yiu get the urge to say more later when time permits I will be looking forward to it.
by A Guy Called LULU on Thu, 06/25/2015 - 9:15pm
Just that, someone mentioned on the other threat that the Confederate flag is a Rorschach test. I think that's true of almost any flag. We make them into receptacles of our feelings about the nation or regime or party symbolized by the flag. Love your country, you stand and salute the flag. Don't like a country or its leaders, you outlaw the flag or spit on it or burn it (as Dylann Roof did). But I don't think flags are just passive receptacles. They actually crystallize our feelings and impel us to give a whole nation a thumbs up or thumbs down instead of seeing the complexity. Flags help nationalize us. So in a world without flags, to complete the thought experiment, I think it would be harder to follow national leaders so blindly or revile other nations so thoroughly.
To be clear, I say harder to nationalize, not impossible. Nor is it realistic to eliminate flags. But I think it's interesting to imagine.
by Michael Wolraich on Fri, 06/26/2015 - 11:56am
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 06/26/2015 - 12:58pm
Thanks. Sorry to be slow getting back to say so. I guess this topic is done so I will just veer away and use this spot to say here that I share the Dag group's good cheer at the recent court decisions.
by A Guy Called LULU on Sat, 06/27/2015 - 1:27am
Apples and oranges. The Israeli counterpart to Dylann Roof was Baruch Goldstein.
by Michael Wolraich on Thu, 06/25/2015 - 11:19am