MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
New York Times' Economix Blog, August 15, 2011
....The study, from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, estimates that of every dollar consumers spend on a product labeled “Made in China,” about 45 cents goes to China for the cost of the original import.
On the other hand, about 55 cents of that dollar pays for services produced in the United States, such as the transportation for the product, rent for the store where the product is sold, the salaries of the salespeople at the store, the cost of marketing the product, the profits for shareholders of the retailer selling the product and so on.
What’s more, the fraction of a retail product’s price going to American services is higher for Chinese-made products than for products made in other foreign countries....
....the San Francisco Fed’s study also looked into what share of total personal consumption expenditures in the United States goes to imported final goods (again, consumer products) and intermediate goods (parts).
The authors found that about 13.9 percent of all United States consumer spending goes to imports, including both final and intermediate goods. Chinese imports alone — including both final goods and intermediate goods from China — accounts for just 1.9 percent of total consumer spending.
Comments
Actually, I'm surprised to see China capturing 45% of the profits.
Or are they counting produced-by-Foxconn products as being from Taiwan because Foxconn is technically a Taiwanese company? I imagine Apple is a typical example, they pay like $188 in parts and $6.50 in labor for an iPhone4 while the thing sells for $650 retail (at around a 40% profit) ... which leaves around $195 for the rest of the supply/retail/marketing chain.
Even if China were capturing 100% profit on labor and materials they are only looking at 30% max out of that arrangement. There must be something bringing up profits somewhere to make up for the way they are undercutting the electronics sector.
by kgb999 on Tue, 08/16/2011 - 2:05pm
I think part is trans-Pacific shipping (doesn't count on the US side).
But yes, 45% seems like a lot. Of course makes a difference if toys or electronics or other goods.
One of these hippie socialist sites summed it up as: (Barbies were even wider margins from what I remember):
by PeraclesPlease (not verified) on Tue, 08/16/2011 - 3:20pm