MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Within his article, Rieckhoff cited the Senate Roll Call votes on improved medical care for first responders.
I was STUNNED to see that the only Democrat who voted against it was our Majority Leader, Harry Reid of Nevada. Why would he do that?
Comments
Sorry -- the link icon is grayed out; I've tried it three times and it simply won't go red. (Btw, the info about formatting options says links will embed automatically -- que pasa?)
by wws on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 9:14am
They're all like that. It's something that I haven't figure out how to fix yet. But the embedded link in the right column works, which is how most people access the link.
by Michael Wolraich on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 9:38am
Genghis, just an observation, in case it helps:
I noticed you recently did something so that the news posts by a user show up on the user's account (before that, they didn't show up like that, like regular posts do.)
After you did that, this also happened: when anyone goes to the indivdidual page of each post, the link in the title goes to the post on Dag Blog, and no longer goes to the article off-site.
To be clear, before that: when one went to the individual page, those dead urls were there, but the title was still a direct link to the article off-site. Whatever you did made it so the title link went dead (well, not really dead, but to the dag blog page,) when looking at the page.
The reason it's frustrating the new way is that if there's a discussion and someone wants to refer to the article to quote it or whatever, or someone coming to the post from seeing a comment on "latest comments" the actual article, it's hard to get to. In the latter case, it means they might be tempted to join the discussion without reading the article. Or if someone wants to link to that news article when making a comment on a regular post (i.e., on a Wikileaks discussion post, they want to say "but look at this news piece Seaton just posted.") they have to go through several steps to give the person a live link.
I don't know if it's so important to have these posts listed under the poster's account, I can't think of a good reason they need to be, but I havent' thought about it much--maybe because then it shows up on tracking too? I did notice that the comments were showing up on "latest comments" before you made the change, so I know they were being tracked that way.
by artappraiser on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 10:14am
AA, I really don't think that the link in the title ever when to the offsite page. I haven't had a chance to figure out how to customize the link page. When I do, I will address the title and the dead link issue.
by Michael Wolraich on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 12:29pm
Both issues are now fixed
by Michael Wolraich on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 1:47pm
You are like the techie every businessperson I know dreams of having but can't find. It is too bad that you find it boring, but on second thought, maybe that is one of the reasons you are so efficient. That is all.
by artappraiser on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 1:57pm
Thank you for the fix, Genghis. To save room, in both the News and Recent Comments sections, shall I now delete the comments that addressed this problem?
by wws on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 1:57pm
Don't worry about it. The comments will be pushed down soon enough, and people can always click the more link. I'll work on the In the News section this afternoon if I have time.
by Michael Wolraich on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 2:21pm
I tried to delete my whole link; that's the only way the ones with comments would stay up, isn't it? And I really was kidding about training the most-comments to stay afloat. You may be a fantastic tecchie, but teaching links to Walk on Water might be er...impossible.
by we are stardust on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 3:11pm
wws,
The way it works is your titles automatically become the live links.
If you access the news page via "more" from the menu,
this page:
http://dagblog.com/in-the-news
you'll see the titles are all links.
That this doesn't work on individual posts is something that only recently started happening, as I describe to Genghis above.
by artappraiser on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 10:22am
Thanks for the explanation, Genghis and ArtA; I appreciate it.
by wws on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 10:37am
Genghis? Another question? I thought you might have said that we could delte our posts in this section. I tried, as Obey's link was getting lots of comments, and deleting mine could stall his progress down and off the thread. Shorter: is there a way we can delete our own? Or the more complicated fix: can those with comments be taught to stay up longer? Woof! Good dog! ;o)
by we are stardust on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 11:50am
You can delete by going to the link comments and clicking on the edit tab. Then hit the delete button at the bottom. Complicated, I know.
It's hard to come up with a system that maintains chronological order but also privileges links with comments. I'll think about it thought.
by Michael Wolraich on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 12:24pm
Reid's no vote is purely procedural. It reserves him the right to bring it up again. I'm not sure of all of the details--the parliamentary rules in the senate are terribly complicated at times--but I'm 99% that this is the case. Any parliamentarian out there who can clarify, please?
by kyle flynn on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 12:09pm
Thanks for the explanation Kyle; I hope you're right -- otherwise, the Senate just got more upside down.
by wws on Fri, 12/17/2010 - 1:59pm